Cargando…
Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949 |
_version_ | 1783584665267863552 |
---|---|
author | Mercadal, Marina Herrero, Carolina López-Rodrigo, Olga Castells, Manel de la Fuente, Alexandre Vigués, Francesc Bassas, Lluís Larriba, Sara |
author_facet | Mercadal, Marina Herrero, Carolina López-Rodrigo, Olga Castells, Manel de la Fuente, Alexandre Vigués, Francesc Bassas, Lluís Larriba, Sara |
author_sort | Mercadal, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them. ExoGAG 3500× g and the miRCURY Cell/Urine/CSF 1500× g methods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures to UC for isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7504614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75046142020-09-26 Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study Mercadal, Marina Herrero, Carolina López-Rodrigo, Olga Castells, Manel de la Fuente, Alexandre Vigués, Francesc Bassas, Lluís Larriba, Sara Int J Mol Sci Article Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them. ExoGAG 3500× g and the miRCURY Cell/Urine/CSF 1500× g methods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures to UC for isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis. MDPI 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7504614/ /pubmed/32824915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mercadal, Marina Herrero, Carolina López-Rodrigo, Olga Castells, Manel de la Fuente, Alexandre Vigués, Francesc Bassas, Lluís Larriba, Sara Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title | Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | impact of extracellular vesicle isolation methods on downstream mirna analysis in semen: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercadalmarina impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT herrerocarolina impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT lopezrodrigoolga impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT castellsmanel impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT delafuentealexandre impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT viguesfrancesc impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT bassaslluis impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy AT larribasara impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy |