Cargando…

Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study

Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercadal, Marina, Herrero, Carolina, López-Rodrigo, Olga, Castells, Manel, de la Fuente, Alexandre, Vigués, Francesc, Bassas, Lluís, Larriba, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949
_version_ 1783584665267863552
author Mercadal, Marina
Herrero, Carolina
López-Rodrigo, Olga
Castells, Manel
de la Fuente, Alexandre
Vigués, Francesc
Bassas, Lluís
Larriba, Sara
author_facet Mercadal, Marina
Herrero, Carolina
López-Rodrigo, Olga
Castells, Manel
de la Fuente, Alexandre
Vigués, Francesc
Bassas, Lluís
Larriba, Sara
author_sort Mercadal, Marina
collection PubMed
description Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them. ExoGAG 3500× g and the miRCURY Cell/Urine/CSF 1500× g methods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures to UC for isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75046142020-09-26 Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study Mercadal, Marina Herrero, Carolina López-Rodrigo, Olga Castells, Manel de la Fuente, Alexandre Vigués, Francesc Bassas, Lluís Larriba, Sara Int J Mol Sci Article Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them. ExoGAG 3500× g and the miRCURY Cell/Urine/CSF 1500× g methods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures to UC for isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis. MDPI 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7504614/ /pubmed/32824915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mercadal, Marina
Herrero, Carolina
López-Rodrigo, Olga
Castells, Manel
de la Fuente, Alexandre
Vigués, Francesc
Bassas, Lluís
Larriba, Sara
Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title_full Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title_short Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream miRNA Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study
title_sort impact of extracellular vesicle isolation methods on downstream mirna analysis in semen: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21175949
work_keys_str_mv AT mercadalmarina impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT herrerocarolina impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT lopezrodrigoolga impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT castellsmanel impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT delafuentealexandre impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT viguesfrancesc impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT bassaslluis impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy
AT larribasara impactofextracellularvesicleisolationmethodsondownstreammirnaanalysisinsemenacomparativestudy