Cargando…

Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure

The adverse health effects of exposure to air pollutants, notably to particulate matter (PM), are well-known, as well as the association with measured or estimated concentration levels. The role of perception can be relevant in exploring effects and pollution control actions. The purpose of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cori, Liliana, Donzelli, Gabriele, Gorini, Francesca, Bianchi, Fabrizio, Curzio, Olivia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176424
_version_ 1783584669161226240
author Cori, Liliana
Donzelli, Gabriele
Gorini, Francesca
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Curzio, Olivia
author_facet Cori, Liliana
Donzelli, Gabriele
Gorini, Francesca
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Curzio, Olivia
author_sort Cori, Liliana
collection PubMed
description The adverse health effects of exposure to air pollutants, notably to particulate matter (PM), are well-known, as well as the association with measured or estimated concentration levels. The role of perception can be relevant in exploring effects and pollution control actions. The purpose of this study was to explore studies that analyse people’s perception, together with the measurement of air pollution, in order to elucidate the relationship between them. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In March 2020, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were explored in an attempt to search for studies published from 2000 to 2020. The review included 38 studies, most of which were conducted in China (n = 13) and the United States (n = 11) and published over the last four years (n = 26). Three studies were multicenter investigations, while five articles were based on a national-level survey. The air quality (AQ) was assessed by monitoring stations (n = 24) or dispersion models (n = 7). Many studies were population questionnaire-based, air monitoring and time-series studies, and web-based investigations. A direct association between exposure and perception emerged in 20 studies. This systematic review has shown that most of the studies establish a relationship between risk perception measurement. A broad spectrum of concepts and notions related to perception also emerged, which is undoubtedly an indicator of the wealth of available knowledge and is promising for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75046322020-09-26 Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure Cori, Liliana Donzelli, Gabriele Gorini, Francesca Bianchi, Fabrizio Curzio, Olivia Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The adverse health effects of exposure to air pollutants, notably to particulate matter (PM), are well-known, as well as the association with measured or estimated concentration levels. The role of perception can be relevant in exploring effects and pollution control actions. The purpose of this study was to explore studies that analyse people’s perception, together with the measurement of air pollution, in order to elucidate the relationship between them. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In March 2020, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were explored in an attempt to search for studies published from 2000 to 2020. The review included 38 studies, most of which were conducted in China (n = 13) and the United States (n = 11) and published over the last four years (n = 26). Three studies were multicenter investigations, while five articles were based on a national-level survey. The air quality (AQ) was assessed by monitoring stations (n = 24) or dispersion models (n = 7). Many studies were population questionnaire-based, air monitoring and time-series studies, and web-based investigations. A direct association between exposure and perception emerged in 20 studies. This systematic review has shown that most of the studies establish a relationship between risk perception measurement. A broad spectrum of concepts and notions related to perception also emerged, which is undoubtedly an indicator of the wealth of available knowledge and is promising for future research. MDPI 2020-09-03 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7504632/ /pubmed/32899325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176424 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cori, Liliana
Donzelli, Gabriele
Gorini, Francesca
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Curzio, Olivia
Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title_full Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title_fullStr Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title_full_unstemmed Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title_short Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure
title_sort risk perception of air pollution: a systematic review focused on particulate matter exposure
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176424
work_keys_str_mv AT corililiana riskperceptionofairpollutionasystematicreviewfocusedonparticulatematterexposure
AT donzelligabriele riskperceptionofairpollutionasystematicreviewfocusedonparticulatematterexposure
AT gorinifrancesca riskperceptionofairpollutionasystematicreviewfocusedonparticulatematterexposure
AT bianchifabrizio riskperceptionofairpollutionasystematicreviewfocusedonparticulatematterexposure
AT curzioolivia riskperceptionofairpollutionasystematicreviewfocusedonparticulatematterexposure