Cargando…

Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided. This process also refers to the protection and promotion of patients’ rights. However, reviewing the criteria and content incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sperling, Daniel, Pikkel, Rina B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00405-1
_version_ 1783584672863748096
author Sperling, Daniel
Pikkel, Rina B.
author_facet Sperling, Daniel
Pikkel, Rina B.
author_sort Sperling, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided. This process also refers to the protection and promotion of patients’ rights. However, reviewing the criteria and content included in this category in the Israeli context reveals definitions and implications that differ from those presented by the law – specifically the Patient’s Rights Act 1995. Moreover, the rights included in it are not necessarily equally represented in other legislation. METHODS: This study seeks to examine the question of whether and to what extent the scope, contents, and definitions of patients’ rights in the JCI Standards are similar to or different from patients’ rights as they are addressed and protected in national legislation. The article provides a comparison and examination of the different regulatory frameworks of patients’ rights, especially those in the accreditation of healthcare institution and legislation, analyzes the gaps between such frameworks, and suggests possible implications on our understanding of the concept of patients’ rights. RESULTS: The patients’ right chapter in the accreditation process introduces and promotes the concepts of patient and family rights, increases the awareness and compliance of such concepts, and may create greater consistency in their introduction and application. CONCLUSIONS: Discussion of the Israeli case not only demonstrates how regulatory frameworks are instrumental – for broader policy purposes, especially in the area of patients’ rights and the rights of patients’ families – but also calls for a more general examination of the concept of patients’ rights in health policies and its contribution to the quality of health services. Reference to patients’ rights in accreditation of healthcare institutions may promote and enhance this concept and contribute to the delivery of care, thereby complementing a lacuna in the law.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75046492020-09-23 Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation Sperling, Daniel Pikkel, Rina B. Isr J Health Policy Res Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided. This process also refers to the protection and promotion of patients’ rights. However, reviewing the criteria and content included in this category in the Israeli context reveals definitions and implications that differ from those presented by the law – specifically the Patient’s Rights Act 1995. Moreover, the rights included in it are not necessarily equally represented in other legislation. METHODS: This study seeks to examine the question of whether and to what extent the scope, contents, and definitions of patients’ rights in the JCI Standards are similar to or different from patients’ rights as they are addressed and protected in national legislation. The article provides a comparison and examination of the different regulatory frameworks of patients’ rights, especially those in the accreditation of healthcare institution and legislation, analyzes the gaps between such frameworks, and suggests possible implications on our understanding of the concept of patients’ rights. RESULTS: The patients’ right chapter in the accreditation process introduces and promotes the concepts of patient and family rights, increases the awareness and compliance of such concepts, and may create greater consistency in their introduction and application. CONCLUSIONS: Discussion of the Israeli case not only demonstrates how regulatory frameworks are instrumental – for broader policy purposes, especially in the area of patients’ rights and the rights of patients’ families – but also calls for a more general examination of the concept of patients’ rights in health policies and its contribution to the quality of health services. Reference to patients’ rights in accreditation of healthcare institutions may promote and enhance this concept and contribute to the delivery of care, thereby complementing a lacuna in the law. BioMed Central 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7504649/ /pubmed/32958047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00405-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sperling, Daniel
Pikkel, Rina B.
Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title_full Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title_fullStr Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title_full_unstemmed Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title_short Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
title_sort promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00405-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sperlingdaniel promotingpatientsrightsthroughhospitalaccreditation
AT pikkelrinab promotingpatientsrightsthroughhospitalaccreditation