Cargando…

Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa

BACKGROUND: While community engagement is increasingly promoted in global health research to improve ethical research practice, it can sometimes coerce participation and thereby compromise ethical research. This paper seeks to discuss some of the ethical issues arising from community engagement in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyirenda, Deborah, Sariola, Salla, Kingori, Patricia, Squire, Bertie, Bandawe, Chiwoza, Parker, Michael, Desmond, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00530-1
_version_ 1783584715093049344
author Nyirenda, Deborah
Sariola, Salla
Kingori, Patricia
Squire, Bertie
Bandawe, Chiwoza
Parker, Michael
Desmond, Nicola
author_facet Nyirenda, Deborah
Sariola, Salla
Kingori, Patricia
Squire, Bertie
Bandawe, Chiwoza
Parker, Michael
Desmond, Nicola
author_sort Nyirenda, Deborah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While community engagement is increasingly promoted in global health research to improve ethical research practice, it can sometimes coerce participation and thereby compromise ethical research. This paper seeks to discuss some of the ethical issues arising from community engagement in a low resource setting. METHODS: A qualitative study design focusing on the engagement activities of three biomedical research projects as ethnographic case studies was used to gain in-depth understanding of community engagement as experienced by multiple stakeholders in Malawi. Data was collected through participant observation, 43 In-depth interviews and 17 focus group discussions with community leaders, research staff, community members and research participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret the findings. RESULTS: The results showed that structural coercion arose due to an interplay of factors pertaining to social-economic context, study design and power relations among research stakeholders. The involvement of community leaders, government stakeholders, and power inequalities among research stakeholders affected some participants’ ability to make autonomous decisions about research participation. These results have been presented under the themes of perception of research as development, research participants’ motivation to access individual benefits, the power of vernacular translations to influence research participation, and coercive power of leaders. CONCLUSION: The study identified ethical issues in community engagement practices pertaining to structural coercion. We conclude that community engagement alone did not address underlying structural inequalities to ensure adequate protection of communities. These results raise important questions on how to balance between engaging communities to improve research participation and ensure that informed consent is voluntarily given.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7504839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75048392020-09-23 Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa Nyirenda, Deborah Sariola, Salla Kingori, Patricia Squire, Bertie Bandawe, Chiwoza Parker, Michael Desmond, Nicola BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: While community engagement is increasingly promoted in global health research to improve ethical research practice, it can sometimes coerce participation and thereby compromise ethical research. This paper seeks to discuss some of the ethical issues arising from community engagement in a low resource setting. METHODS: A qualitative study design focusing on the engagement activities of three biomedical research projects as ethnographic case studies was used to gain in-depth understanding of community engagement as experienced by multiple stakeholders in Malawi. Data was collected through participant observation, 43 In-depth interviews and 17 focus group discussions with community leaders, research staff, community members and research participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret the findings. RESULTS: The results showed that structural coercion arose due to an interplay of factors pertaining to social-economic context, study design and power relations among research stakeholders. The involvement of community leaders, government stakeholders, and power inequalities among research stakeholders affected some participants’ ability to make autonomous decisions about research participation. These results have been presented under the themes of perception of research as development, research participants’ motivation to access individual benefits, the power of vernacular translations to influence research participation, and coercive power of leaders. CONCLUSION: The study identified ethical issues in community engagement practices pertaining to structural coercion. We conclude that community engagement alone did not address underlying structural inequalities to ensure adequate protection of communities. These results raise important questions on how to balance between engaging communities to improve research participation and ensure that informed consent is voluntarily given. BioMed Central 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7504839/ /pubmed/32957967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00530-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nyirenda, Deborah
Sariola, Salla
Kingori, Patricia
Squire, Bertie
Bandawe, Chiwoza
Parker, Michael
Desmond, Nicola
Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title_full Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title_fullStr Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title_short Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa
title_sort structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00530-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nyirendadeborah structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT sariolasalla structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT kingoripatricia structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT squirebertie structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT bandawechiwoza structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT parkermichael structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica
AT desmondnicola structuralcoercioninthecontextofcommunityengagementinglobalhealthresearchconductedinalowresourcesettinginafrica