Cargando…

AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE: To assess whether retinal thickness measurements with a standard 30° spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are comparable with wide-field 55° SD-OCT. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy individuals were scanned using 55° as well as 30° SD-OCT according to a standardized protocol....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena, Munk, Marion R., Ebneter, Andreas, Wolf, Sebastian, Zinkernagel, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Retina 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002714
_version_ 1783584759366025216
author Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena
Munk, Marion R.
Ebneter, Andreas
Wolf, Sebastian
Zinkernagel, Martin
author_facet Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena
Munk, Marion R.
Ebneter, Andreas
Wolf, Sebastian
Zinkernagel, Martin
author_sort Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess whether retinal thickness measurements with a standard 30° spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are comparable with wide-field 55° SD-OCT. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy individuals were scanned using 55° as well as 30° SD-OCT according to a standardized protocol. Automated retinal layer segmentation of standard and wide-field SD-OCTs was assessed using customized software. RESULTS: Both lenses showed a high correlation when analyzing total retinal thickness within the central, the inner, and the outer retinal ring (r = > 0.9). Automated thickness measurements with the 55° system were marginally higher compared with the 30° lens. The thickness of each separate retinal layer using automated segmentation showed excellent correlations within the inner and outer rings (range: r = 0.6—r = 0.9 for the inner ring and range: r = 0.9—r = 1.0 for the outer ring). CONCLUSION: Fifty-five degree wide-field SD-OCT provides a good overview of the posterior pole and presents similar quantitative values as a standard 30° OCT lens. Therefore, thickness values are comparable when switching between these two lenses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7505155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Retina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75051552020-09-24 AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena Munk, Marion R. Ebneter, Andreas Wolf, Sebastian Zinkernagel, Martin Retina Original Study PURPOSE: To assess whether retinal thickness measurements with a standard 30° spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are comparable with wide-field 55° SD-OCT. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy individuals were scanned using 55° as well as 30° SD-OCT according to a standardized protocol. Automated retinal layer segmentation of standard and wide-field SD-OCTs was assessed using customized software. RESULTS: Both lenses showed a high correlation when analyzing total retinal thickness within the central, the inner, and the outer retinal ring (r = > 0.9). Automated thickness measurements with the 55° system were marginally higher compared with the 30° lens. The thickness of each separate retinal layer using automated segmentation showed excellent correlations within the inner and outer rings (range: r = 0.6—r = 0.9 for the inner ring and range: r = 0.9—r = 1.0 for the outer ring). CONCLUSION: Fifty-five degree wide-field SD-OCT provides a good overview of the posterior pole and presents similar quantitative values as a standard 30° OCT lens. Therefore, thickness values are comparable when switching between these two lenses. Retina 2020-10 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7505155/ /pubmed/31834134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002714 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Study
Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena
Munk, Marion R.
Ebneter, Andreas
Wolf, Sebastian
Zinkernagel, Martin
AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title_fullStr AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full_unstemmed AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title_short AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography
title_sort automated retinal layer segmentation and their thickness profiles in healthy subjects: a comparison of 55° wide-field and conventional 30° spectral domain-optical coherence tomography
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002714
work_keys_str_mv AT giannakakizimmermannhelena automatedretinallayersegmentationandtheirthicknessprofilesinhealthysubjectsacomparisonof55widefieldandconventional30spectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT munkmarionr automatedretinallayersegmentationandtheirthicknessprofilesinhealthysubjectsacomparisonof55widefieldandconventional30spectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT ebneterandreas automatedretinallayersegmentationandtheirthicknessprofilesinhealthysubjectsacomparisonof55widefieldandconventional30spectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT wolfsebastian automatedretinallayersegmentationandtheirthicknessprofilesinhealthysubjectsacomparisonof55widefieldandconventional30spectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT zinkernagelmartin automatedretinallayersegmentationandtheirthicknessprofilesinhealthysubjectsacomparisonof55widefieldandconventional30spectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography