Cargando…
Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
PURPOSE: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S270519 |
_version_ | 1783584870467895296 |
---|---|
author | Song, Jianyuan Duan, Cuicui Cai, Wangyu Wu, Wei Lv, Houyi Xu, Jian |
author_facet | Song, Jianyuan Duan, Cuicui Cai, Wangyu Wu, Wei Lv, Houyi Xu, Jian |
author_sort | Song, Jianyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 302 patients with endometrium <8 mm undergoing fresh embryo transfer at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. In 148 cycles of the GnRH-a prolonged protocol, one depot of 3.75 mg GnRH-a was injected on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, while in 154 cycles of the short GnRH-a long protocol, 0.1 mg of GnRH-a was injected daily from the mid-luteal phase. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and characteristics of stimulation procedures. RESULTS: Live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group than in the other group (36.5% vs 20.8%, P=0.002; 43.9% vs 28.2%, P=0.006, respectively). The live birth rate was significantly increased in the prolonged protocol group (crude OR: 2.190, 95% CI: 1.311, 3.660; adjusted OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.430, 4.224) compared with that in the reference group. The implantation rate of the former group was also significantly higher than that of the latter group (35.4% vs 15.9%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two protocols. In terms of stimulation procedures, the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group required significantly higher Gn time (10.9 vs 9.5 days, P=0.000) and Gn consumption (2625.0 vs 2047.5 IU, P=0.000) than the short GnRH-a long protocol group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH-a prolonged protocol in fresh embryo transfer cycles yielded better clinical outcomes of patients with thin endometrium than the short GnRH-a long protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7505707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75057072020-09-24 Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study Song, Jianyuan Duan, Cuicui Cai, Wangyu Wu, Wei Lv, Houyi Xu, Jian Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 302 patients with endometrium <8 mm undergoing fresh embryo transfer at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. In 148 cycles of the GnRH-a prolonged protocol, one depot of 3.75 mg GnRH-a was injected on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, while in 154 cycles of the short GnRH-a long protocol, 0.1 mg of GnRH-a was injected daily from the mid-luteal phase. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and characteristics of stimulation procedures. RESULTS: Live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group than in the other group (36.5% vs 20.8%, P=0.002; 43.9% vs 28.2%, P=0.006, respectively). The live birth rate was significantly increased in the prolonged protocol group (crude OR: 2.190, 95% CI: 1.311, 3.660; adjusted OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.430, 4.224) compared with that in the reference group. The implantation rate of the former group was also significantly higher than that of the latter group (35.4% vs 15.9%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two protocols. In terms of stimulation procedures, the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group required significantly higher Gn time (10.9 vs 9.5 days, P=0.000) and Gn consumption (2625.0 vs 2047.5 IU, P=0.000) than the short GnRH-a long protocol group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH-a prolonged protocol in fresh embryo transfer cycles yielded better clinical outcomes of patients with thin endometrium than the short GnRH-a long protocol. Dove 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7505707/ /pubmed/32982174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S270519 Text en © 2020 Song et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Song, Jianyuan Duan, Cuicui Cai, Wangyu Wu, Wei Lv, Houyi Xu, Jian Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | comparison of gnrh-a prolonged protocol and short gnrh-a long protocol in patients with thin endometrium for assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S270519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songjianyuan comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT duancuicui comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT caiwangyu comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuwei comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lvhouyi comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xujian comparisonofgnrhaprolongedprotocolandshortgnrhalongprotocolinpatientswiththinendometriumforassistedreproductionaretrospectivecohortstudy |