Cargando…

A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Mary, Waller, Morgan, Pandya, Aarti, Portnoy, Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32959158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7
_version_ 1783584873551757312
author Nguyen, Mary
Waller, Morgan
Pandya, Aarti
Portnoy, Jay
author_facet Nguyen, Mary
Waller, Morgan
Pandya, Aarti
Portnoy, Jay
author_sort Nguyen, Mary
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at least as satisfied with it as they are with in-person visits. Since deviations from expected care can result in reduced satisfaction regardless of the quality of the visit or objective medical outcomes, it is important to understand and to help form those expectations when possible. Patients consistently report 95–100% satisfaction rate with TM when compared with in-person appointments. They tend to cite the convenience of decreased travel times and costs as the main drivers for satisfaction with TM. Providers tend to be satisfied with TM if they have input into its development, there is administrative support, the technology is reliable and easy to use, and if there is adequate reimbursement for its use. SUMMARY: Satisfaction with TM is necessary for adoption of this new technology. To improve satisfaction it is important to consider factors that drive it both for patients and for providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7505720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75057202020-09-23 A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine Nguyen, Mary Waller, Morgan Pandya, Aarti Portnoy, Jay Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at least as satisfied with it as they are with in-person visits. Since deviations from expected care can result in reduced satisfaction regardless of the quality of the visit or objective medical outcomes, it is important to understand and to help form those expectations when possible. Patients consistently report 95–100% satisfaction rate with TM when compared with in-person appointments. They tend to cite the convenience of decreased travel times and costs as the main drivers for satisfaction with TM. Providers tend to be satisfied with TM if they have input into its development, there is administrative support, the technology is reliable and easy to use, and if there is adequate reimbursement for its use. SUMMARY: Satisfaction with TM is necessary for adoption of this new technology. To improve satisfaction it is important to consider factors that drive it both for patients and for providers. Springer US 2020-09-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7505720/ /pubmed/32959158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor)
Nguyen, Mary
Waller, Morgan
Pandya, Aarti
Portnoy, Jay
A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title_full A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title_fullStr A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title_short A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
title_sort review of patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine
topic Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32959158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenmary areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT wallermorgan areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT pandyaaarti areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT portnoyjay areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT nguyenmary reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT wallermorgan reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT pandyaaarti reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine
AT portnoyjay reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine