Cargando…
A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at lea...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32959158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7 |
_version_ | 1783584873551757312 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Mary Waller, Morgan Pandya, Aarti Portnoy, Jay |
author_facet | Nguyen, Mary Waller, Morgan Pandya, Aarti Portnoy, Jay |
author_sort | Nguyen, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at least as satisfied with it as they are with in-person visits. Since deviations from expected care can result in reduced satisfaction regardless of the quality of the visit or objective medical outcomes, it is important to understand and to help form those expectations when possible. Patients consistently report 95–100% satisfaction rate with TM when compared with in-person appointments. They tend to cite the convenience of decreased travel times and costs as the main drivers for satisfaction with TM. Providers tend to be satisfied with TM if they have input into its development, there is administrative support, the technology is reliable and easy to use, and if there is adequate reimbursement for its use. SUMMARY: Satisfaction with TM is necessary for adoption of this new technology. To improve satisfaction it is important to consider factors that drive it both for patients and for providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7505720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75057202020-09-23 A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine Nguyen, Mary Waller, Morgan Pandya, Aarti Portnoy, Jay Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the determinants of satisfaction with telemedicine (TM) and how they compare with in-person visits from both the perspective of patients and of providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of TM will expand only if patients and providers are at least as satisfied with it as they are with in-person visits. Since deviations from expected care can result in reduced satisfaction regardless of the quality of the visit or objective medical outcomes, it is important to understand and to help form those expectations when possible. Patients consistently report 95–100% satisfaction rate with TM when compared with in-person appointments. They tend to cite the convenience of decreased travel times and costs as the main drivers for satisfaction with TM. Providers tend to be satisfied with TM if they have input into its development, there is administrative support, the technology is reliable and easy to use, and if there is adequate reimbursement for its use. SUMMARY: Satisfaction with TM is necessary for adoption of this new technology. To improve satisfaction it is important to consider factors that drive it both for patients and for providers. Springer US 2020-09-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7505720/ /pubmed/32959158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor) Nguyen, Mary Waller, Morgan Pandya, Aarti Portnoy, Jay A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title | A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title_full | A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title_fullStr | A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title_short | A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine |
title_sort | review of patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine |
topic | Telemedicine and Technology (J Portnoy, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32959158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00969-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenmary areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT wallermorgan areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT pandyaaarti areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT portnoyjay areviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT nguyenmary reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT wallermorgan reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT pandyaaarti reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine AT portnoyjay reviewofpatientandprovidersatisfactionwithtelemedicine |