Cargando…
Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data
GOAL: PET is a relatively noisy process compared to other imaging modalities, and sparsity of acquisition data leads to noise in the images. Recent work has focused on machine learning techniques to improve PET images, and this study investigates a deep learning approach to improve the quality of re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00695-1 |
_version_ | 1783584915247333376 |
---|---|
author | Schaefferkoetter, Josh Yan, Jianhua Ortega, Claudia Sertic, Andrew Lechtman, Eli Eshet, Yael Metser, Ur Veit-Haibach, Patrick |
author_facet | Schaefferkoetter, Josh Yan, Jianhua Ortega, Claudia Sertic, Andrew Lechtman, Eli Eshet, Yael Metser, Ur Veit-Haibach, Patrick |
author_sort | Schaefferkoetter, Josh |
collection | PubMed |
description | GOAL: PET is a relatively noisy process compared to other imaging modalities, and sparsity of acquisition data leads to noise in the images. Recent work has focused on machine learning techniques to improve PET images, and this study investigates a deep learning approach to improve the quality of reconstructed image volumes through denoising by a 3D convolution neural network. Potential improvements were evaluated within a clinical context by physician performance in a reading task. METHODS: A wide range of controlled noise levels was emulated from a set of chest PET data in patients with lung cancer, and a convolutional neural network was trained to denoise the reconstructed images using the full-count reconstructions as the ground truth. The benefits, over conventional Gaussian smoothing, were quantified across all noise levels by observer performance in an image ranking and lesion detection task. RESULTS: The CNN-denoised images were generally ranked by the physicians equal to or better than the Gaussian-smoothed images for all count levels, with the largest effects observed in the lowest-count image sets. For the CNN-denoised images, overall lesion contrast recovery was 60% and 90% at the 1 and 20 million count levels, respectively. Notwithstanding the reduced lesion contrast recovery in noisy data, the CNN-denoised images also yielded better lesion detectability in low count levels. For example, at 1 million true counts, the average true positive detection rate was around 40% for the CNN-denoised images and 30% for the smoothed images. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements were found for CNN-denoising for very noisy images, and to some degree for all noise levels. The technique presented here offered however limited benefit for detection performance for images at the count levels routinely encountered in the clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7505915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75059152020-10-05 Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data Schaefferkoetter, Josh Yan, Jianhua Ortega, Claudia Sertic, Andrew Lechtman, Eli Eshet, Yael Metser, Ur Veit-Haibach, Patrick EJNMMI Res Original Research GOAL: PET is a relatively noisy process compared to other imaging modalities, and sparsity of acquisition data leads to noise in the images. Recent work has focused on machine learning techniques to improve PET images, and this study investigates a deep learning approach to improve the quality of reconstructed image volumes through denoising by a 3D convolution neural network. Potential improvements were evaluated within a clinical context by physician performance in a reading task. METHODS: A wide range of controlled noise levels was emulated from a set of chest PET data in patients with lung cancer, and a convolutional neural network was trained to denoise the reconstructed images using the full-count reconstructions as the ground truth. The benefits, over conventional Gaussian smoothing, were quantified across all noise levels by observer performance in an image ranking and lesion detection task. RESULTS: The CNN-denoised images were generally ranked by the physicians equal to or better than the Gaussian-smoothed images for all count levels, with the largest effects observed in the lowest-count image sets. For the CNN-denoised images, overall lesion contrast recovery was 60% and 90% at the 1 and 20 million count levels, respectively. Notwithstanding the reduced lesion contrast recovery in noisy data, the CNN-denoised images also yielded better lesion detectability in low count levels. For example, at 1 million true counts, the average true positive detection rate was around 40% for the CNN-denoised images and 30% for the smoothed images. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements were found for CNN-denoising for very noisy images, and to some degree for all noise levels. The technique presented here offered however limited benefit for detection performance for images at the count levels routinely encountered in the clinic. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7505915/ /pubmed/32955669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00695-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schaefferkoetter, Josh Yan, Jianhua Ortega, Claudia Sertic, Andrew Lechtman, Eli Eshet, Yael Metser, Ur Veit-Haibach, Patrick Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title | Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title_full | Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title_fullStr | Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title_full_unstemmed | Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title_short | Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data |
title_sort | convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy pet data |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00695-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schaefferkoetterjosh convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT yanjianhua convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT ortegaclaudia convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT serticandrew convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT lechtmaneli convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT eshetyael convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT metserur convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata AT veithaibachpatrick convolutionalneuralnetworksforimprovingimagequalitywithnoisypetdata |