Cargando…
Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446 |
_version_ | 1783584917335048192 |
---|---|
author | Hazelzet, Emmelie Bosma, Hans de Rijk, Angelique Houkes, Inge |
author_facet | Hazelzet, Emmelie Bosma, Hans de Rijk, Angelique Houkes, Inge |
author_sort | Hazelzet, Emmelie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an online step-by-step support toolkit for employers, “Healthy Human Resources” (HHR). When intervening, this toolkit enables and stimulates employers to have a continuous dialogue with their low-educated employees. By improving the employees' job control, HHR is aimed at cost-beneficially improving SE. This paper describes the protocol of the evaluation study to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation process of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. Methods: The protocol of the evaluation study consists of: (1) an effect evaluation with a pretest-posttest design with a 1-year follow-up in five work organizations in the Netherlands deploying low-educated employees and with SE as the primary outcome and job control as the secondary outcome. The effect evaluation is expanded with a budget impact analysis; (2) a mixed-method process evaluation at 6 and 12 months after the start of HHR to evaluate the whole implementation process of HHR. This includes the experiences with HHR of various stakeholders, such as employees, human resource managers, and line managers. Discussion: The effect evaluation will give insight into the effects of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. The process evaluation will provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of the (in) effectiveness of HHR. By improving dialogue, we hypothesize that HHR, through enhancing job control, will strengthen the SE of low-educated employees. Also for helping with tackling the socioeconomic health gap, if proven effective, the implementation of HHR on a wider scale can be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7505925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75059252020-10-02 Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” Hazelzet, Emmelie Bosma, Hans de Rijk, Angelique Houkes, Inge Front Public Health Public Health Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an online step-by-step support toolkit for employers, “Healthy Human Resources” (HHR). When intervening, this toolkit enables and stimulates employers to have a continuous dialogue with their low-educated employees. By improving the employees' job control, HHR is aimed at cost-beneficially improving SE. This paper describes the protocol of the evaluation study to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation process of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. Methods: The protocol of the evaluation study consists of: (1) an effect evaluation with a pretest-posttest design with a 1-year follow-up in five work organizations in the Netherlands deploying low-educated employees and with SE as the primary outcome and job control as the secondary outcome. The effect evaluation is expanded with a budget impact analysis; (2) a mixed-method process evaluation at 6 and 12 months after the start of HHR to evaluate the whole implementation process of HHR. This includes the experiences with HHR of various stakeholders, such as employees, human resource managers, and line managers. Discussion: The effect evaluation will give insight into the effects of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. The process evaluation will provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of the (in) effectiveness of HHR. By improving dialogue, we hypothesize that HHR, through enhancing job control, will strengthen the SE of low-educated employees. Also for helping with tackling the socioeconomic health gap, if proven effective, the implementation of HHR on a wider scale can be recommended. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7505925/ /pubmed/33014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hazelzet, Bosma, de Rijk and Houkes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Hazelzet, Emmelie Bosma, Hans de Rijk, Angelique Houkes, Inge Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title | Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title_full | Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title_fullStr | Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title_short | Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” |
title_sort | does dialogue improve the sustainable employability of low-educated employees? a study protocol for an effect and process evaluation of “healthy hr” |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hazelzetemmelie doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr AT bosmahans doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr AT derijkangelique doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr AT houkesinge doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr |