Cargando…

Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”

Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazelzet, Emmelie, Bosma, Hans, de Rijk, Angelique, Houkes, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446
_version_ 1783584917335048192
author Hazelzet, Emmelie
Bosma, Hans
de Rijk, Angelique
Houkes, Inge
author_facet Hazelzet, Emmelie
Bosma, Hans
de Rijk, Angelique
Houkes, Inge
author_sort Hazelzet, Emmelie
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an online step-by-step support toolkit for employers, “Healthy Human Resources” (HHR). When intervening, this toolkit enables and stimulates employers to have a continuous dialogue with their low-educated employees. By improving the employees' job control, HHR is aimed at cost-beneficially improving SE. This paper describes the protocol of the evaluation study to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation process of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. Methods: The protocol of the evaluation study consists of: (1) an effect evaluation with a pretest-posttest design with a 1-year follow-up in five work organizations in the Netherlands deploying low-educated employees and with SE as the primary outcome and job control as the secondary outcome. The effect evaluation is expanded with a budget impact analysis; (2) a mixed-method process evaluation at 6 and 12 months after the start of HHR to evaluate the whole implementation process of HHR. This includes the experiences with HHR of various stakeholders, such as employees, human resource managers, and line managers. Discussion: The effect evaluation will give insight into the effects of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. The process evaluation will provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of the (in) effectiveness of HHR. By improving dialogue, we hypothesize that HHR, through enhancing job control, will strengthen the SE of low-educated employees. Also for helping with tackling the socioeconomic health gap, if proven effective, the implementation of HHR on a wider scale can be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7505925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75059252020-10-02 Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR” Hazelzet, Emmelie Bosma, Hans de Rijk, Angelique Houkes, Inge Front Public Health Public Health Background: There is a need to develop sustainable employability (SE) interventions that are better aligned to the needs of low-educated employees. This group needs to get a voice in intervention development and implementation. In this study, a dialogue-based approach is proposed consisting of an online step-by-step support toolkit for employers, “Healthy Human Resources” (HHR). When intervening, this toolkit enables and stimulates employers to have a continuous dialogue with their low-educated employees. By improving the employees' job control, HHR is aimed at cost-beneficially improving SE. This paper describes the protocol of the evaluation study to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation process of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. Methods: The protocol of the evaluation study consists of: (1) an effect evaluation with a pretest-posttest design with a 1-year follow-up in five work organizations in the Netherlands deploying low-educated employees and with SE as the primary outcome and job control as the secondary outcome. The effect evaluation is expanded with a budget impact analysis; (2) a mixed-method process evaluation at 6 and 12 months after the start of HHR to evaluate the whole implementation process of HHR. This includes the experiences with HHR of various stakeholders, such as employees, human resource managers, and line managers. Discussion: The effect evaluation will give insight into the effects of HHR on the SE of low-educated employees. The process evaluation will provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of the (in) effectiveness of HHR. By improving dialogue, we hypothesize that HHR, through enhancing job control, will strengthen the SE of low-educated employees. Also for helping with tackling the socioeconomic health gap, if proven effective, the implementation of HHR on a wider scale can be recommended. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7505925/ /pubmed/33014964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hazelzet, Bosma, de Rijk and Houkes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Hazelzet, Emmelie
Bosma, Hans
de Rijk, Angelique
Houkes, Inge
Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title_full Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title_fullStr Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title_full_unstemmed Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title_short Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of “Healthy HR”
title_sort does dialogue improve the sustainable employability of low-educated employees? a study protocol for an effect and process evaluation of “healthy hr”
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00446
work_keys_str_mv AT hazelzetemmelie doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr
AT bosmahans doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr
AT derijkangelique doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr
AT houkesinge doesdialogueimprovethesustainableemployabilityofloweducatedemployeesastudyprotocolforaneffectandprocessevaluationofhealthyhr