Cargando…

Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Depa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Codt, Matthieu, Balza, Claire, Jadoul, Pascale, Forget, Patrice, Squifflet, Jean-Luc, Bernard, Pierre, Luyckx, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064
_version_ 1783584933861654528
author de Codt, Matthieu
Balza, Claire
Jadoul, Pascale
Forget, Patrice
Squifflet, Jean-Luc
Bernard, Pierre
Luyckx, Mathieu
author_facet de Codt, Matthieu
Balza, Claire
Jadoul, Pascale
Forget, Patrice
Squifflet, Jean-Luc
Bernard, Pierre
Luyckx, Mathieu
author_sort de Codt, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Departments (Gynecology and Obstetrics) of a tertiary medical care center (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients: Women with first trimester missed abortion. Intervention: Two techniques were used for the management of missed abortion: ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopic resection (HsR). Results: We evaluated 358 patients who underwent primary surgical removal of missed abortion. Hundred seventy three patients have been treated by D&C and 185 underwent HsR. In the HsR group, 110 patients (59.5%) have obtained their pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. 7 patients (4.0%) in the D&C group which make the HsR population hypofertile in comparison to the D&C population. The intra- and post-operative complication rates are low and comparable. Intrauterine anomalies were diagnosed during the HsR in 10 patients (5.4%) and could be investigated after the intervention as a possible cause of miscarriage. Because of the difference in term of fertility, the reproductive outcomes have been analyzed by multivariate analysis. The hazard ratio of pregnancy at 6 months, adjusted to the factor IVF for D&C compared to HsR is 0.69 [0.49–0.96] (p = 0.026). That could represent a significant benefit in the particular population followed in IVF, but regarding the retrospective analysis, and the very different population in the two groups, it doesn't allow us to draw any evidence based conclusion. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the management of missed abortion that could increase the diagnosis of uterine abnormalities. With all the limitation of the design of our study, our data seems to show a trend to a potential benefit in term of reproductive outcomes for hypofertile patient undergoing IVF treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7505996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75059962020-10-22 Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage de Codt, Matthieu Balza, Claire Jadoul, Pascale Forget, Patrice Squifflet, Jean-Luc Bernard, Pierre Luyckx, Mathieu Front Surg Surgery Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Departments (Gynecology and Obstetrics) of a tertiary medical care center (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients: Women with first trimester missed abortion. Intervention: Two techniques were used for the management of missed abortion: ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopic resection (HsR). Results: We evaluated 358 patients who underwent primary surgical removal of missed abortion. Hundred seventy three patients have been treated by D&C and 185 underwent HsR. In the HsR group, 110 patients (59.5%) have obtained their pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. 7 patients (4.0%) in the D&C group which make the HsR population hypofertile in comparison to the D&C population. The intra- and post-operative complication rates are low and comparable. Intrauterine anomalies were diagnosed during the HsR in 10 patients (5.4%) and could be investigated after the intervention as a possible cause of miscarriage. Because of the difference in term of fertility, the reproductive outcomes have been analyzed by multivariate analysis. The hazard ratio of pregnancy at 6 months, adjusted to the factor IVF for D&C compared to HsR is 0.69 [0.49–0.96] (p = 0.026). That could represent a significant benefit in the particular population followed in IVF, but regarding the retrospective analysis, and the very different population in the two groups, it doesn't allow us to draw any evidence based conclusion. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the management of missed abortion that could increase the diagnosis of uterine abnormalities. With all the limitation of the design of our study, our data seems to show a trend to a potential benefit in term of reproductive outcomes for hypofertile patient undergoing IVF treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7505996/ /pubmed/33102514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064 Text en Copyright © 2020 de Codt, Balza, Jadoul, Forget, Squifflet, Bernard and Luyckx. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
de Codt, Matthieu
Balza, Claire
Jadoul, Pascale
Forget, Patrice
Squifflet, Jean-Luc
Bernard, Pierre
Luyckx, Mathieu
Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title_full Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title_fullStr Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title_full_unstemmed Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title_short Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
title_sort hysteroscopic resection for missed abortion: feasibility, operative technique and potential benefit compared to curettage
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064
work_keys_str_mv AT decodtmatthieu hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT balzaclaire hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT jadoulpascale hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT forgetpatrice hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT squiffletjeanluc hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT bernardpierre hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage
AT luyckxmathieu hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage