Cargando…
Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Depa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064 |
_version_ | 1783584933861654528 |
---|---|
author | de Codt, Matthieu Balza, Claire Jadoul, Pascale Forget, Patrice Squifflet, Jean-Luc Bernard, Pierre Luyckx, Mathieu |
author_facet | de Codt, Matthieu Balza, Claire Jadoul, Pascale Forget, Patrice Squifflet, Jean-Luc Bernard, Pierre Luyckx, Mathieu |
author_sort | de Codt, Matthieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Departments (Gynecology and Obstetrics) of a tertiary medical care center (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients: Women with first trimester missed abortion. Intervention: Two techniques were used for the management of missed abortion: ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopic resection (HsR). Results: We evaluated 358 patients who underwent primary surgical removal of missed abortion. Hundred seventy three patients have been treated by D&C and 185 underwent HsR. In the HsR group, 110 patients (59.5%) have obtained their pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. 7 patients (4.0%) in the D&C group which make the HsR population hypofertile in comparison to the D&C population. The intra- and post-operative complication rates are low and comparable. Intrauterine anomalies were diagnosed during the HsR in 10 patients (5.4%) and could be investigated after the intervention as a possible cause of miscarriage. Because of the difference in term of fertility, the reproductive outcomes have been analyzed by multivariate analysis. The hazard ratio of pregnancy at 6 months, adjusted to the factor IVF for D&C compared to HsR is 0.69 [0.49–0.96] (p = 0.026). That could represent a significant benefit in the particular population followed in IVF, but regarding the retrospective analysis, and the very different population in the two groups, it doesn't allow us to draw any evidence based conclusion. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the management of missed abortion that could increase the diagnosis of uterine abnormalities. With all the limitation of the design of our study, our data seems to show a trend to a potential benefit in term of reproductive outcomes for hypofertile patient undergoing IVF treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7505996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75059962020-10-22 Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage de Codt, Matthieu Balza, Claire Jadoul, Pascale Forget, Patrice Squifflet, Jean-Luc Bernard, Pierre Luyckx, Mathieu Front Surg Surgery Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of hysteroscopic resection (HsR) for primary surgical management of missed abortion. Reproductive outcomes and potential benefit of this technique will be compared to traditional dilatation and curettage (D&C). Design: Retrospective cohort study in two Departments (Gynecology and Obstetrics) of a tertiary medical care center (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients: Women with first trimester missed abortion. Intervention: Two techniques were used for the management of missed abortion: ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopic resection (HsR). Results: We evaluated 358 patients who underwent primary surgical removal of missed abortion. Hundred seventy three patients have been treated by D&C and 185 underwent HsR. In the HsR group, 110 patients (59.5%) have obtained their pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. 7 patients (4.0%) in the D&C group which make the HsR population hypofertile in comparison to the D&C population. The intra- and post-operative complication rates are low and comparable. Intrauterine anomalies were diagnosed during the HsR in 10 patients (5.4%) and could be investigated after the intervention as a possible cause of miscarriage. Because of the difference in term of fertility, the reproductive outcomes have been analyzed by multivariate analysis. The hazard ratio of pregnancy at 6 months, adjusted to the factor IVF for D&C compared to HsR is 0.69 [0.49–0.96] (p = 0.026). That could represent a significant benefit in the particular population followed in IVF, but regarding the retrospective analysis, and the very different population in the two groups, it doesn't allow us to draw any evidence based conclusion. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the management of missed abortion that could increase the diagnosis of uterine abnormalities. With all the limitation of the design of our study, our data seems to show a trend to a potential benefit in term of reproductive outcomes for hypofertile patient undergoing IVF treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7505996/ /pubmed/33102514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064 Text en Copyright © 2020 de Codt, Balza, Jadoul, Forget, Squifflet, Bernard and Luyckx. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery de Codt, Matthieu Balza, Claire Jadoul, Pascale Forget, Patrice Squifflet, Jean-Luc Bernard, Pierre Luyckx, Mathieu Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title | Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title_full | Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title_fullStr | Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title_full_unstemmed | Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title_short | Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage |
title_sort | hysteroscopic resection for missed abortion: feasibility, operative technique and potential benefit compared to curettage |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decodtmatthieu hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT balzaclaire hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT jadoulpascale hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT forgetpatrice hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT squiffletjeanluc hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT bernardpierre hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage AT luyckxmathieu hysteroscopicresectionformissedabortionfeasibilityoperativetechniqueandpotentialbenefitcomparedtocurettage |