Cargando…
Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression
Treating adolescent depression effectively requires providing interventions that are optimally suited to patients’ individual characteristics and needs. Therefore, we aim to develop an algorithm that matches patients with optimal treatment among cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), fluoxetine (FLX),...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01005-y |
_version_ | 1783584935514210304 |
---|---|
author | Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie VanZomeren, Adrienne Ma, Sisi |
author_facet | Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie VanZomeren, Adrienne Ma, Sisi |
author_sort | Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treating adolescent depression effectively requires providing interventions that are optimally suited to patients’ individual characteristics and needs. Therefore, we aim to develop an algorithm that matches patients with optimal treatment among cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), fluoxetine (FLX), and combination treatment (COMB). We leveraged data from a completed clinical trial, the Treatment for adolescents with depression study, where a wide range of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures were collected from adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder prior to treatment. Machine-learning techniques were employed to derive a model that predicts treatment response (week 12 children’s depression rating scale-revised [CDRS-R]) to CBT, FLX, and COMB. The resulting model successfully identified subgroups of patients that respond preferentially to specific types of treatment. Specifically, our model identified a subgroup of patients (25%) that achieved on average a 16.9 point benefit on the CDRS-R from FLX compared to CBT. The model also identified a subgroup of patients (50%) that achieved an average benefit up to 19.0 points from COMB compared to CBT. Physical illness and disability were identified as overall predictors of response to treatment, regardless of treatment type, whereas baseline CDRS-R, psychosomatic symptoms, school missed, view of self, treatment expectations, and attention problems determined the patients’ response to specific treatments. The model developed in this study provides a critical starting point for personalized treatment planning for adolescent depression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7506003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75060032020-10-05 Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie VanZomeren, Adrienne Ma, Sisi Transl Psychiatry Article Treating adolescent depression effectively requires providing interventions that are optimally suited to patients’ individual characteristics and needs. Therefore, we aim to develop an algorithm that matches patients with optimal treatment among cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), fluoxetine (FLX), and combination treatment (COMB). We leveraged data from a completed clinical trial, the Treatment for adolescents with depression study, where a wide range of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures were collected from adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder prior to treatment. Machine-learning techniques were employed to derive a model that predicts treatment response (week 12 children’s depression rating scale-revised [CDRS-R]) to CBT, FLX, and COMB. The resulting model successfully identified subgroups of patients that respond preferentially to specific types of treatment. Specifically, our model identified a subgroup of patients (25%) that achieved on average a 16.9 point benefit on the CDRS-R from FLX compared to CBT. The model also identified a subgroup of patients (50%) that achieved an average benefit up to 19.0 points from COMB compared to CBT. Physical illness and disability were identified as overall predictors of response to treatment, regardless of treatment type, whereas baseline CDRS-R, psychosomatic symptoms, school missed, view of self, treatment expectations, and attention problems determined the patients’ response to specific treatments. The model developed in this study provides a critical starting point for personalized treatment planning for adolescent depression. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7506003/ /pubmed/32958758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01005-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie VanZomeren, Adrienne Ma, Sisi Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title | Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title_full | Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title_fullStr | Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title_short | Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
title_sort | developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01005-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunlicksstoesselmeredith developingadatadrivenalgorithmforguidingselectionbetweencognitivebehavioraltherapyfluoxetineandcombinationtreatmentforadolescentdepression AT klimesdouganbonnie developingadatadrivenalgorithmforguidingselectionbetweencognitivebehavioraltherapyfluoxetineandcombinationtreatmentforadolescentdepression AT vanzomerenadrienne developingadatadrivenalgorithmforguidingselectionbetweencognitivebehavioraltherapyfluoxetineandcombinationtreatmentforadolescentdepression AT masisi developingadatadrivenalgorithmforguidingselectionbetweencognitivebehavioraltherapyfluoxetineandcombinationtreatmentforadolescentdepression |