Cargando…

Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users

Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely on temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) to understand speech, and clinical outcomes depend on the accuracy with which these TEMs are encoded by the electrically-stimulated neural ensembles. Non-invasive EEG measures of this encoding could help clinicians identify and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gransier, Robin, Carlyon, Robert P., Wouters, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72235-9
_version_ 1783584940226510848
author Gransier, Robin
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
author_facet Gransier, Robin
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
author_sort Gransier, Robin
collection PubMed
description Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely on temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) to understand speech, and clinical outcomes depend on the accuracy with which these TEMs are encoded by the electrically-stimulated neural ensembles. Non-invasive EEG measures of this encoding could help clinicians identify and disable electrodes that evoke poor neural responses so as to improve CI outcomes. However, recording EEG during CI stimulation reveals huge stimulation artifacts that are up to orders of magnitude larger than the neural response. Here we used a custom-built EEG system having an exceptionally high sample rate to accurately measure the artefact, which we then removed using linear interpolation so as to reveal the neural response during continuous electrical stimulation. In ten adult CI users, we measured the 40-Hz electrically evoked auditory steady-state response (eASSR) and electrically evoked auditory change complex (eACC) to amplitude-modulated 900-pulses-per-second pulse trains, stimulated in monopolar mode (i.e. the clinical default), and at different modulation depths. We successfully measured artifact-free 40-Hz eASSRs and eACCs. Moreover, we found that the 40-Hz eASSR, in contrast to the eACC, showed substantial responses even at shallow modulation depths. We argue that the 40-Hz eASSR is a clinically feasible objective measure to assess TEM encoding in CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75060232020-09-22 Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users Gransier, Robin Carlyon, Robert P. Wouters, Jan Sci Rep Article Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely on temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) to understand speech, and clinical outcomes depend on the accuracy with which these TEMs are encoded by the electrically-stimulated neural ensembles. Non-invasive EEG measures of this encoding could help clinicians identify and disable electrodes that evoke poor neural responses so as to improve CI outcomes. However, recording EEG during CI stimulation reveals huge stimulation artifacts that are up to orders of magnitude larger than the neural response. Here we used a custom-built EEG system having an exceptionally high sample rate to accurately measure the artefact, which we then removed using linear interpolation so as to reveal the neural response during continuous electrical stimulation. In ten adult CI users, we measured the 40-Hz electrically evoked auditory steady-state response (eASSR) and electrically evoked auditory change complex (eACC) to amplitude-modulated 900-pulses-per-second pulse trains, stimulated in monopolar mode (i.e. the clinical default), and at different modulation depths. We successfully measured artifact-free 40-Hz eASSRs and eACCs. Moreover, we found that the 40-Hz eASSR, in contrast to the eACC, showed substantial responses even at shallow modulation depths. We argue that the 40-Hz eASSR is a clinically feasible objective measure to assess TEM encoding in CI users. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7506023/ /pubmed/32958791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72235-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gransier, Robin
Carlyon, Robert P.
Wouters, Jan
Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title_full Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title_fullStr Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title_short Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
title_sort electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72235-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gransierrobin electrophysiologicalassessmentoftemporalenvelopeprocessingincochlearimplantusers
AT carlyonrobertp electrophysiologicalassessmentoftemporalenvelopeprocessingincochlearimplantusers
AT woutersjan electrophysiologicalassessmentoftemporalenvelopeprocessingincochlearimplantusers