Cargando…

Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation

Growing diversity of protein-based technologies dictates further development of bio manufacturing to lower the cost of production and maximize yields. Intracellularly expressed recombinant proteins must be extracted from production host prior to purification. Use of electroporation to obtain protein...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haberl Meglič, Saša, Janež, Nika, Peterka, Matjaž, Flisar, Karel, Kotnik, Tadej, Miklavčič, Damijan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.543187
_version_ 1783584942847950848
author Haberl Meglič, Saša
Janež, Nika
Peterka, Matjaž
Flisar, Karel
Kotnik, Tadej
Miklavčič, Damijan
author_facet Haberl Meglič, Saša
Janež, Nika
Peterka, Matjaž
Flisar, Karel
Kotnik, Tadej
Miklavčič, Damijan
author_sort Haberl Meglič, Saša
collection PubMed
description Growing diversity of protein-based technologies dictates further development of bio manufacturing to lower the cost of production and maximize yields. Intracellularly expressed recombinant proteins must be extracted from production host prior to purification. Use of electroporation to obtain proteins from bacteria and yeasts has been demonstrated in several studies for different modes of operation and formats. Here we tested various protocols for protein extraction from Escherichia coli by means of electroporation. The tested protocols were compared to established extraction methods of ultrasonication and glass-bead milling in terms of protein yields and content of impurities such as host cell DNA and endotoxins in the lysate. Protein extraction yield was maximal when exponentially growing bacteria were treated at 37°C, regardless of the electroporation mode of operation (batch or flow). We were unable to eliminate co-extraction of host DNA and endotoxins, but with 8 × 1 ms, 5 kV/cm, 1 Hz pulses they were minimized. Yields with optimized electroporation (up to 86 g protein/kg dry weight) were inferior to those in ultrasonication (up to 144 g protein/kg dry weight) and glass-bead milling (up to 280 g protein/kg dry weight). Nevertheless, electroporation largely avoids cell lysis and disintegration with which the extract is a mix of extracted proteins with debris of the bacterial envelope and bacterial DNA, which necessitates further purification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75060342020-10-02 Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation Haberl Meglič, Saša Janež, Nika Peterka, Matjaž Flisar, Karel Kotnik, Tadej Miklavčič, Damijan Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Growing diversity of protein-based technologies dictates further development of bio manufacturing to lower the cost of production and maximize yields. Intracellularly expressed recombinant proteins must be extracted from production host prior to purification. Use of electroporation to obtain proteins from bacteria and yeasts has been demonstrated in several studies for different modes of operation and formats. Here we tested various protocols for protein extraction from Escherichia coli by means of electroporation. The tested protocols were compared to established extraction methods of ultrasonication and glass-bead milling in terms of protein yields and content of impurities such as host cell DNA and endotoxins in the lysate. Protein extraction yield was maximal when exponentially growing bacteria were treated at 37°C, regardless of the electroporation mode of operation (batch or flow). We were unable to eliminate co-extraction of host DNA and endotoxins, but with 8 × 1 ms, 5 kV/cm, 1 Hz pulses they were minimized. Yields with optimized electroporation (up to 86 g protein/kg dry weight) were inferior to those in ultrasonication (up to 144 g protein/kg dry weight) and glass-bead milling (up to 280 g protein/kg dry weight). Nevertheless, electroporation largely avoids cell lysis and disintegration with which the extract is a mix of extracted proteins with debris of the bacterial envelope and bacterial DNA, which necessitates further purification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7506034/ /pubmed/33015013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.543187 Text en Copyright © 2020 Haberl Meglič, Janež, Peterka, Flisar, Kotnik and Miklavčič. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Haberl Meglič, Saša
Janež, Nika
Peterka, Matjaž
Flisar, Karel
Kotnik, Tadej
Miklavčič, Damijan
Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title_full Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title_fullStr Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title_short Evaluation and Optimization of Protein Extraction From E. coli by Electroporation
title_sort evaluation and optimization of protein extraction from e. coli by electroporation
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.543187
work_keys_str_mv AT haberlmeglicsasa evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation
AT janeznika evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation
AT peterkamatjaz evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation
AT flisarkarel evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation
AT kotniktadej evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation
AT miklavcicdamijan evaluationandoptimizationofproteinextractionfromecolibyelectroporation