Cargando…

Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE: Robust predictors for response to anti–programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PD-L1 (CD274) copy number gains (CNGs), comprising amplification and polysomy, in pretreat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Yusuke, Yoshimura, Katsuhiro, Nishimoto, Koji, Inui, Naoki, Karayama, Masato, Yasui, Hideki, Hozumi, Hironao, Suzuki, Yuzo, Furuhashi, Kazuki, Fujisawa, Tomoyuki, Enomoto, Noriyuki, Nakamura, Yutaro, Asada, Kazuhiro, Uto, Tomohiro, Fujii, Masato, Matsui, Takashi, Matsuura, Shun, Hashimoto, Dai, Toyoshima, Mikio, Kusagaya, Hideki, Matsuda, Hiroyuki, Inami, Nao, Kaida, Yusuke, Niwa, Mitsuru, Ito, Yasuhiro, Sugimura, Haruhiko, Suda, Takafumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11818
_version_ 1783585034151657472
author Inoue, Yusuke
Yoshimura, Katsuhiro
Nishimoto, Koji
Inui, Naoki
Karayama, Masato
Yasui, Hideki
Hozumi, Hironao
Suzuki, Yuzo
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Fujisawa, Tomoyuki
Enomoto, Noriyuki
Nakamura, Yutaro
Asada, Kazuhiro
Uto, Tomohiro
Fujii, Masato
Matsui, Takashi
Matsuura, Shun
Hashimoto, Dai
Toyoshima, Mikio
Kusagaya, Hideki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Inami, Nao
Kaida, Yusuke
Niwa, Mitsuru
Ito, Yasuhiro
Sugimura, Haruhiko
Suda, Takafumi
author_facet Inoue, Yusuke
Yoshimura, Katsuhiro
Nishimoto, Koji
Inui, Naoki
Karayama, Masato
Yasui, Hideki
Hozumi, Hironao
Suzuki, Yuzo
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Fujisawa, Tomoyuki
Enomoto, Noriyuki
Nakamura, Yutaro
Asada, Kazuhiro
Uto, Tomohiro
Fujii, Masato
Matsui, Takashi
Matsuura, Shun
Hashimoto, Dai
Toyoshima, Mikio
Kusagaya, Hideki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Inami, Nao
Kaida, Yusuke
Niwa, Mitsuru
Ito, Yasuhiro
Sugimura, Haruhiko
Suda, Takafumi
author_sort Inoue, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Robust predictors for response to anti–programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PD-L1 (CD274) copy number gains (CNGs), comprising amplification and polysomy, in pretreatment specimens assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy in NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study enrolled 200 patients, of whom 194 had assessable tumors, with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab after progression following prior treatment at 14 institutions in Japan between July 2016 and December 2018. Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 12.6 (5.6-20.4) months. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. EXPOSURES: Sequential nivolumab was given on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Response was assessed every 4 cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall response rate (ORR) according to the PD-L1 copy number status. Additional end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) assessed by immunohistochemistry based on PD-L1 copy number status. RESULTS: A total of 6 of the 200 patients were excluded because of poor-quality tumor specimens for the biomarker study, resulting in 194 assessable patients. Of these, 155 (79.9%) were men, with a median (range) age of 69 (43-83) years. PD-L1 CNGs were identified in 32 patients (16.5%), including 5 (2.6%) with amplification and 27 (13.9%) with polysomy. The ORR among patients with and without PD-L1 CNGs was 28.1% (95% CI, 13.7%-46.7%) and 17.9% (95% CI, 12.3%-24.7%), respectively. Although patients with PD-L1 polysomy did not demonstrate improved ORR (18.5% [95% CI, 6.3%-38.1%]) compared with those without PD-L1 CNGs, 4 of 5 patients (80.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%]) with PD-L1 amplification showed response, among whom median duration of response was not reached. Patients with PD-L1 amplification showed excellent survival outcomes for progression-free and overall survival. Overall, 3 PD-L1-amplified tumors (60.0%) showed PD-L1 TPS of at least 80%, but 2 (40.0%) had PD-L1 TPS of 15% or less. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, tumor PD-L1 amplification but not polysomy was associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy among patients with NSCLC. External validation with a larger sample size is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75065182020-09-25 Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer Inoue, Yusuke Yoshimura, Katsuhiro Nishimoto, Koji Inui, Naoki Karayama, Masato Yasui, Hideki Hozumi, Hironao Suzuki, Yuzo Furuhashi, Kazuki Fujisawa, Tomoyuki Enomoto, Noriyuki Nakamura, Yutaro Asada, Kazuhiro Uto, Tomohiro Fujii, Masato Matsui, Takashi Matsuura, Shun Hashimoto, Dai Toyoshima, Mikio Kusagaya, Hideki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Inami, Nao Kaida, Yusuke Niwa, Mitsuru Ito, Yasuhiro Sugimura, Haruhiko Suda, Takafumi JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Robust predictors for response to anti–programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PD-L1 (CD274) copy number gains (CNGs), comprising amplification and polysomy, in pretreatment specimens assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy in NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study enrolled 200 patients, of whom 194 had assessable tumors, with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab after progression following prior treatment at 14 institutions in Japan between July 2016 and December 2018. Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 12.6 (5.6-20.4) months. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. EXPOSURES: Sequential nivolumab was given on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Response was assessed every 4 cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall response rate (ORR) according to the PD-L1 copy number status. Additional end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) assessed by immunohistochemistry based on PD-L1 copy number status. RESULTS: A total of 6 of the 200 patients were excluded because of poor-quality tumor specimens for the biomarker study, resulting in 194 assessable patients. Of these, 155 (79.9%) were men, with a median (range) age of 69 (43-83) years. PD-L1 CNGs were identified in 32 patients (16.5%), including 5 (2.6%) with amplification and 27 (13.9%) with polysomy. The ORR among patients with and without PD-L1 CNGs was 28.1% (95% CI, 13.7%-46.7%) and 17.9% (95% CI, 12.3%-24.7%), respectively. Although patients with PD-L1 polysomy did not demonstrate improved ORR (18.5% [95% CI, 6.3%-38.1%]) compared with those without PD-L1 CNGs, 4 of 5 patients (80.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%]) with PD-L1 amplification showed response, among whom median duration of response was not reached. Patients with PD-L1 amplification showed excellent survival outcomes for progression-free and overall survival. Overall, 3 PD-L1-amplified tumors (60.0%) showed PD-L1 TPS of at least 80%, but 2 (40.0%) had PD-L1 TPS of 15% or less. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, tumor PD-L1 amplification but not polysomy was associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy among patients with NSCLC. External validation with a larger sample size is warranted. American Medical Association 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7506518/ /pubmed/32955570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11818 Text en Copyright 2020 Inoue Y et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Inoue, Yusuke
Yoshimura, Katsuhiro
Nishimoto, Koji
Inui, Naoki
Karayama, Masato
Yasui, Hideki
Hozumi, Hironao
Suzuki, Yuzo
Furuhashi, Kazuki
Fujisawa, Tomoyuki
Enomoto, Noriyuki
Nakamura, Yutaro
Asada, Kazuhiro
Uto, Tomohiro
Fujii, Masato
Matsui, Takashi
Matsuura, Shun
Hashimoto, Dai
Toyoshima, Mikio
Kusagaya, Hideki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Inami, Nao
Kaida, Yusuke
Niwa, Mitsuru
Ito, Yasuhiro
Sugimura, Haruhiko
Suda, Takafumi
Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 (pd-l1) gene amplification and response to nivolumab monotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11818
work_keys_str_mv AT inoueyusuke evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yoshimurakatsuhiro evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nishimotokoji evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT inuinaoki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT karayamamasato evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yasuihideki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hozumihironao evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT suzukiyuzo evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT furuhashikazuki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT fujisawatomoyuki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT enomotonoriyuki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nakamurayutaro evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT asadakazuhiro evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT utotomohiro evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT fujiimasato evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT matsuitakashi evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT matsuurashun evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hashimotodai evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT toyoshimamikio evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kusagayahideki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT matsudahiroyuki evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT inaminao evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kaidayusuke evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT niwamitsuru evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT itoyasuhiro evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT sugimuraharuhiko evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT sudatakafumi evaluationofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1geneamplificationandresponsetonivolumabmonotherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancer