Cargando…

Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography

Surface electromyogram (EMG) is a noninvasive measure of muscle electrical activity and has been widely used in a variety of applications. When recorded from the trunk, surface EMG can be contaminated by the cardiac electrical activity, i.e., the electrocardiogram (ECG). ECG may distort the desired...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Lin, Peri, Elisabetta, Vullings, Rik, Rabotti, Chiara, Van Dijk, Johannes P., Mischi, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174890
_version_ 1783585065709600768
author Xu, Lin
Peri, Elisabetta
Vullings, Rik
Rabotti, Chiara
Van Dijk, Johannes P.
Mischi, Massimo
author_facet Xu, Lin
Peri, Elisabetta
Vullings, Rik
Rabotti, Chiara
Van Dijk, Johannes P.
Mischi, Massimo
author_sort Xu, Lin
collection PubMed
description Surface electromyogram (EMG) is a noninvasive measure of muscle electrical activity and has been widely used in a variety of applications. When recorded from the trunk, surface EMG can be contaminated by the cardiac electrical activity, i.e., the electrocardiogram (ECG). ECG may distort the desired EMG signal, complicating the extraction of reliable information from the trunk EMG. Several methods are available for ECG removal from the trunk EMG, but a comparative assessment of the performance of these methods is lacking, limiting the possibility of selecting a suitable method for specific applications. The aim of the present study is therefore to review and compare the performance of different ECG removal methods from the trunk EMG. To this end, a synthetic dataset was generated by combining in vivo EMG signals recorded on the biceps brachii and healthy or dysrhythmia ECG data from the Physionet database with a predefined signal-to-noise ratio. Gating, high-pass filtering, template subtraction, wavelet transform, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation were implemented for ECG removal. A robust measure of Kurtosis, i.e., [Formula: see text] and two EMG features, the average rectified value (ARV), and mean frequency (MF), were then calculated from the processed EMG signals and compared with the EMG before mixing. Our results indicate template subtraction to produce the lowest root mean square error in both ARV and MF, providing useful insight for the selection of a suitable ECG removal method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75066642020-09-26 Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography Xu, Lin Peri, Elisabetta Vullings, Rik Rabotti, Chiara Van Dijk, Johannes P. Mischi, Massimo Sensors (Basel) Article Surface electromyogram (EMG) is a noninvasive measure of muscle electrical activity and has been widely used in a variety of applications. When recorded from the trunk, surface EMG can be contaminated by the cardiac electrical activity, i.e., the electrocardiogram (ECG). ECG may distort the desired EMG signal, complicating the extraction of reliable information from the trunk EMG. Several methods are available for ECG removal from the trunk EMG, but a comparative assessment of the performance of these methods is lacking, limiting the possibility of selecting a suitable method for specific applications. The aim of the present study is therefore to review and compare the performance of different ECG removal methods from the trunk EMG. To this end, a synthetic dataset was generated by combining in vivo EMG signals recorded on the biceps brachii and healthy or dysrhythmia ECG data from the Physionet database with a predefined signal-to-noise ratio. Gating, high-pass filtering, template subtraction, wavelet transform, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation were implemented for ECG removal. A robust measure of Kurtosis, i.e., [Formula: see text] and two EMG features, the average rectified value (ARV), and mean frequency (MF), were then calculated from the processed EMG signals and compared with the EMG before mixing. Our results indicate template subtraction to produce the lowest root mean square error in both ARV and MF, providing useful insight for the selection of a suitable ECG removal method. MDPI 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7506664/ /pubmed/32872470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174890 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xu, Lin
Peri, Elisabetta
Vullings, Rik
Rabotti, Chiara
Van Dijk, Johannes P.
Mischi, Massimo
Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title_full Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title_fullStr Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title_short Comparative Review of the Algorithms for Removal of Electrocardiographic Interference from Trunk Electromyography
title_sort comparative review of the algorithms for removal of electrocardiographic interference from trunk electromyography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174890
work_keys_str_mv AT xulin comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography
AT perielisabetta comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography
AT vullingsrik comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography
AT rabottichiara comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography
AT vandijkjohannesp comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography
AT mischimassimo comparativereviewofthealgorithmsforremovalofelectrocardiographicinterferencefromtrunkelectromyography