Cargando…

Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a well-established cause of traveller's diarrhoea and occasional domestic foodborne illness outbreaks in the USA. Although ETEC are not detected by conventional stool culture methods used in clinical laboratories, syndromic culture-independent diagnost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buuck, S., Smith, K., Fowler, R. C., Cebelinski, E., Lappi, V., Boxrud, D., Medus, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001934
_version_ 1783585095667417088
author Buuck, S.
Smith, K.
Fowler, R. C.
Cebelinski, E.
Lappi, V.
Boxrud, D.
Medus, C.
author_facet Buuck, S.
Smith, K.
Fowler, R. C.
Cebelinski, E.
Lappi, V.
Boxrud, D.
Medus, C.
author_sort Buuck, S.
collection PubMed
description Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a well-established cause of traveller's diarrhoea and occasional domestic foodborne illness outbreaks in the USA. Although ETEC are not detected by conventional stool culture methods used in clinical laboratories, syndromic culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) capable of detecting ETEC have become increasingly prevalent in the last decade. This study describes the epidemiology of ETEC infections reported to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) during 2016–2017. ETEC-positive stool specimens were submitted to MDH to confirm the presence of ETEC DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cases were interviewed to ascertain illness and exposures. Contemporaneous Salmonella cases were used as a comparison group in a case-case comparison analysis of risk factors. Of 222 ETEC-positive specimens received by MDH, 108 (49%) were concordant by PCR. ETEC was the sixth most frequently reported bacterial enteric pathogen among a subset of CIDT-positive specimens. Sixty-nine (64%) laboratory-confirmed cases had an additional pathogen codetected with ETEC, including enteroaggregative E. coli (n = 40) and enteropathogenic E. coli (n = 39). Although travel is a risk factor for ETEC infection, only 43% of cases travelled internationally, providing evidence for ETEC as an underestimated source of domestically acquired enteric illness in the USA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75067942020-09-29 Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017 Buuck, S. Smith, K. Fowler, R. C. Cebelinski, E. Lappi, V. Boxrud, D. Medus, C. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a well-established cause of traveller's diarrhoea and occasional domestic foodborne illness outbreaks in the USA. Although ETEC are not detected by conventional stool culture methods used in clinical laboratories, syndromic culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) capable of detecting ETEC have become increasingly prevalent in the last decade. This study describes the epidemiology of ETEC infections reported to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) during 2016–2017. ETEC-positive stool specimens were submitted to MDH to confirm the presence of ETEC DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cases were interviewed to ascertain illness and exposures. Contemporaneous Salmonella cases were used as a comparison group in a case-case comparison analysis of risk factors. Of 222 ETEC-positive specimens received by MDH, 108 (49%) were concordant by PCR. ETEC was the sixth most frequently reported bacterial enteric pathogen among a subset of CIDT-positive specimens. Sixty-nine (64%) laboratory-confirmed cases had an additional pathogen codetected with ETEC, including enteroaggregative E. coli (n = 40) and enteropathogenic E. coli (n = 39). Although travel is a risk factor for ETEC infection, only 43% of cases travelled internationally, providing evidence for ETEC as an underestimated source of domestically acquired enteric illness in the USA. Cambridge University Press 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7506794/ /pubmed/32867880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001934 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Buuck, S.
Smith, K.
Fowler, R. C.
Cebelinski, E.
Lappi, V.
Boxrud, D.
Medus, C.
Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title_full Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title_fullStr Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title_short Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017
title_sort epidemiology of enterotoxigenic escherichia coli infection in minnesota, 2016–2017
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001934
work_keys_str_mv AT buucks epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT smithk epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT fowlerrc epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT cebelinskie epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT lappiv epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT boxrudd epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017
AT medusc epidemiologyofenterotoxigenicescherichiacoliinfectioninminnesota20162017