Cargando…
Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (Li...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809 |
_version_ | 1783585110748037120 |
---|---|
author | Obanawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitoshi, Rena Watanabe, Nariyasu Sakanoue, Seiichi |
author_facet | Obanawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitoshi, Rena Watanabe, Nariyasu Sakanoue, Seiichi |
author_sort | Obanawa, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems. The shapes of leaf tip surface and ground in grassland were determined by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-SfM, pole camera-SfM, and hand-held LiDAR, before and after grass harvesting. Grass height was most accurately estimated using the difference between the maximum value of the point cloud before harvesting, and the minimum value of the point cloud after harvesting, when converting from the point cloud to digital surface model (DSM). We confirmed that the grass height estimation accuracy was the highest in DSM, with a resolution of 50–100 mm for SfM and 20 mm for LiDAR, when the grass width was 10 mm. We also found that the error of the estimated value by LiDAR was about half of that by SfM. As a result, we evaluated the influence of the data conversion method (from point cloud to DSM), and the measurement method on the accuracy of grass height measurement, using SfM and LiDAR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7506864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75068642020-09-26 Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods Obanawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitoshi, Rena Watanabe, Nariyasu Sakanoue, Seiichi Sensors (Basel) Letter Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems. The shapes of leaf tip surface and ground in grassland were determined by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-SfM, pole camera-SfM, and hand-held LiDAR, before and after grass harvesting. Grass height was most accurately estimated using the difference between the maximum value of the point cloud before harvesting, and the minimum value of the point cloud after harvesting, when converting from the point cloud to digital surface model (DSM). We confirmed that the grass height estimation accuracy was the highest in DSM, with a resolution of 50–100 mm for SfM and 20 mm for LiDAR, when the grass width was 10 mm. We also found that the error of the estimated value by LiDAR was about half of that by SfM. As a result, we evaluated the influence of the data conversion method (from point cloud to DSM), and the measurement method on the accuracy of grass height measurement, using SfM and LiDAR. MDPI 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7506864/ /pubmed/32858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Letter Obanawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitoshi, Rena Watanabe, Nariyasu Sakanoue, Seiichi Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title | Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title_full | Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title_fullStr | Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title_short | Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods |
title_sort | portable lidar-based method for improvement of grass height measurement accuracy: comparison with sfm methods |
topic | Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obanawahiroyuki portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods AT yoshitoshirena portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods AT watanabenariyasu portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods AT sakanoueseiichi portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods |