Cargando…

Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods

Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (Li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obanawa, Hiroyuki, Yoshitoshi, Rena, Watanabe, Nariyasu, Sakanoue, Seiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809
_version_ 1783585110748037120
author Obanawa, Hiroyuki
Yoshitoshi, Rena
Watanabe, Nariyasu
Sakanoue, Seiichi
author_facet Obanawa, Hiroyuki
Yoshitoshi, Rena
Watanabe, Nariyasu
Sakanoue, Seiichi
author_sort Obanawa, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems. The shapes of leaf tip surface and ground in grassland were determined by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-SfM, pole camera-SfM, and hand-held LiDAR, before and after grass harvesting. Grass height was most accurately estimated using the difference between the maximum value of the point cloud before harvesting, and the minimum value of the point cloud after harvesting, when converting from the point cloud to digital surface model (DSM). We confirmed that the grass height estimation accuracy was the highest in DSM, with a resolution of 50–100 mm for SfM and 20 mm for LiDAR, when the grass width was 10 mm. We also found that the error of the estimated value by LiDAR was about half of that by SfM. As a result, we evaluated the influence of the data conversion method (from point cloud to DSM), and the measurement method on the accuracy of grass height measurement, using SfM and LiDAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75068642020-09-26 Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods Obanawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitoshi, Rena Watanabe, Nariyasu Sakanoue, Seiichi Sensors (Basel) Letter Plant height is a key indicator of grass growth. However, its accurate measurement at high spatial density with a conventional ruler is time-consuming and costly. We estimated grass height with high accuracy and speed using the structure from motion (SfM) and portable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems. The shapes of leaf tip surface and ground in grassland were determined by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-SfM, pole camera-SfM, and hand-held LiDAR, before and after grass harvesting. Grass height was most accurately estimated using the difference between the maximum value of the point cloud before harvesting, and the minimum value of the point cloud after harvesting, when converting from the point cloud to digital surface model (DSM). We confirmed that the grass height estimation accuracy was the highest in DSM, with a resolution of 50–100 mm for SfM and 20 mm for LiDAR, when the grass width was 10 mm. We also found that the error of the estimated value by LiDAR was about half of that by SfM. As a result, we evaluated the influence of the data conversion method (from point cloud to DSM), and the measurement method on the accuracy of grass height measurement, using SfM and LiDAR. MDPI 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7506864/ /pubmed/32858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Letter
Obanawa, Hiroyuki
Yoshitoshi, Rena
Watanabe, Nariyasu
Sakanoue, Seiichi
Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title_full Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title_fullStr Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title_full_unstemmed Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title_short Portable LiDAR-Based Method for Improvement of Grass Height Measurement Accuracy: Comparison with SfM Methods
title_sort portable lidar-based method for improvement of grass height measurement accuracy: comparison with sfm methods
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174809
work_keys_str_mv AT obanawahiroyuki portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods
AT yoshitoshirena portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods
AT watanabenariyasu portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods
AT sakanoueseiichi portablelidarbasedmethodforimprovementofgrassheightmeasurementaccuracycomparisonwithsfmmethods