Cargando…

Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?

Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bota, Patrícia, Wang, Chen, Fred, Ana, Silva, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723
_version_ 1783585116813000704
author Bota, Patrícia
Wang, Chen
Fred, Ana
Silva, Hugo
author_facet Bota, Patrícia
Wang, Chen
Fred, Ana
Silva, Hugo
author_sort Bota, Patrícia
collection PubMed
description Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7506892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75068922020-09-26 Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? Bota, Patrícia Wang, Chen Fred, Ana Silva, Hugo Sensors (Basel) Article Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets. MDPI 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7506892/ /pubmed/32825624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bota, Patrícia
Wang, Chen
Fred, Ana
Silva, Hugo
Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title_full Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title_short Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
title_sort emotion assessment using feature fusion and decision fusion classification based on physiological data: are we there yet?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723
work_keys_str_mv AT botapatricia emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet
AT wangchen emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet
AT fredana emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet
AT silvahugo emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet