Cargando…
Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet?
Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723 |
_version_ | 1783585116813000704 |
---|---|
author | Bota, Patrícia Wang, Chen Fred, Ana Silva, Hugo |
author_facet | Bota, Patrícia Wang, Chen Fred, Ana Silva, Hugo |
author_sort | Bota, Patrícia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7506892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75068922020-09-26 Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? Bota, Patrícia Wang, Chen Fred, Ana Silva, Hugo Sensors (Basel) Article Emotion recognition based on physiological data classification has been a topic of increasingly growing interest for more than a decade. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis in literature regarding the selection of classifiers to use, sensor modalities, features and range of expected accuracy, just to name a few limitations. In this work, we evaluate emotion in terms of low/high arousal and valence classification through Supervised Learning (SL), Decision Fusion (DF) and Feature Fusion (FF) techniques using multimodal physiological data, namely, Electrocardiography (ECG), Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Respiration (RESP), or Blood Volume Pulse (BVP). The main contribution of our work is a systematic study across five public datasets commonly used in the Emotion Recognition (ER) state-of-the-art, namely: (1) Classification performance analysis of ER benchmarking datasets in the arousal/valence space; (2) Summarising the ranges of the classification accuracy reported across the existing literature; (3) Characterising the results for diverse classifiers, sensor modalities and feature set combinations for ER using accuracy and F1-score; (4) Exploration of an extended feature set for each modality; (5) Systematic analysis of multimodal classification in DF and FF approaches. The experimental results showed that FF is the most competitive technique in terms of classification accuracy and computational complexity. We obtain superior or comparable results to those reported in the state-of-the-art for the selected datasets. MDPI 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7506892/ /pubmed/32825624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bota, Patrícia Wang, Chen Fred, Ana Silva, Hugo Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title | Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title_full | Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title_fullStr | Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title_short | Emotion Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Decision Fusion Classification Based on Physiological Data: Are We There Yet? |
title_sort | emotion assessment using feature fusion and decision fusion classification based on physiological data: are we there yet? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20174723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT botapatricia emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet AT wangchen emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet AT fredana emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet AT silvahugo emotionassessmentusingfeaturefusionanddecisionfusionclassificationbasedonphysiologicaldataarewethereyet |