Cargando…
Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6
Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.649 |
_version_ | 1783585139394084864 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, Jan Mitselos, Anna Jurczak, Wojciech Cordoba, Raul Panizo, Carlos Wrobel, Tomasz Dlugosz‐Danecka, Monika Jiao, James Sukbuntherng, Juthamas Ouellet, Daniele Hellemans, Peter |
author_facet | de Jong, Jan Mitselos, Anna Jurczak, Wojciech Cordoba, Raul Panizo, Carlos Wrobel, Tomasz Dlugosz‐Danecka, Monika Jiao, James Sukbuntherng, Juthamas Ouellet, Daniele Hellemans, Peter |
author_sort | de Jong, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B‐cell malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 μg) and bupropion/midazolam (75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single‐dose ibrutinib plus single‐dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady‐state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed‐effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%‐125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady‐state, the C(max) and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6, as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7506988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75069882020-09-28 Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 de Jong, Jan Mitselos, Anna Jurczak, Wojciech Cordoba, Raul Panizo, Carlos Wrobel, Tomasz Dlugosz‐Danecka, Monika Jiao, James Sukbuntherng, Juthamas Ouellet, Daniele Hellemans, Peter Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B‐cell malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 μg) and bupropion/midazolam (75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single‐dose ibrutinib plus single‐dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady‐state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed‐effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%‐125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady‐state, the C(max) and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6, as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7506988/ /pubmed/32945596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.649 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Jong, Jan Mitselos, Anna Jurczak, Wojciech Cordoba, Raul Panizo, Carlos Wrobel, Tomasz Dlugosz‐Danecka, Monika Jiao, James Sukbuntherng, Juthamas Ouellet, Daniele Hellemans, Peter Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title | Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title_full | Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title_fullStr | Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title_full_unstemmed | Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title_short | Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6 |
title_sort | ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of cyp3a and cyp2b6 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.649 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongjan ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT mitselosanna ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT jurczakwojciech ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT cordobaraul ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT panizocarlos ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT wrobeltomasz ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT dlugoszdaneckamonika ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT jiaojames ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT sukbuntherngjuthamas ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT ouelletdaniele ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 AT hellemanspeter ibrutinibdoesnothaveclinicallyrelevantinteractionswithoralcontraceptivesorsubstratesofcyp3aandcyp2b6 |