Cargando…

Dynamic prediction model to identify young children at high risk of future overweight: Development and internal validation in a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Primary prevention of overweight is to be preferred above secondary prevention, which has shown moderate effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a dynamic prediction model to identify young children in the general population, applicable at every age between birth and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Welten, Marieke, Wijga, Alet H., Hamoen, Marleen, Gehring, Ulrike, Koppelman, Gerard H., Twisk, Jos W.R., Raat, Hein, Heymans, Martijn W., de Kroon, Marlou L.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32400070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12647
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Primary prevention of overweight is to be preferred above secondary prevention, which has shown moderate effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a dynamic prediction model to identify young children in the general population, applicable at every age between birth and age 6, at high risk of future overweight (age 8). METHODS: Data were used from the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy birth cohort, born in 1996 to 1997, in the Netherlands. Participants for whom data on the outcome overweight at age 8 and at least three body mass index SD scores (BMI SDS) at the age of ≥3 months and ≤6 years were available, were included (N = 2265). The outcome of the prediction model is overweight (yes/no) at age 8 (range 7.4‐10.5 years), defined according to the sex‐ and age‐specific BMI cut‐offs of the International Obesity Task Force. RESULTS: After backward selection in a Generalized Estimating Equations analysis, the prediction model included the baseline predictors maternal BMI, paternal BMI, paternal education, birthweight, sex, ethnicity and indoor smoke exposure; and the longitudinal predictors BMI SDS, and the linear and quadratic terms of the growth curve describing a child's BMI SDS development over time, as well as the longitudinal predictors' interactions with age. The area under the curve of the model after internal validation was 0.845 and Nagelkerke R (2) was 0.351. CONCLUSIONS: A dynamic prediction model for overweight was developed with a good predictive ability using easily obtainable predictor information. External validation is needed to confirm that the model has potential for use in practice.