Cargando…

Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore shared decision‐making among residents, their families and staff to determine relevant strategies to support shared decision‐making in long‐term care (LTC). BACKGROUND: Meaningful engagement of long‐term care home (LTCH) residents and their families in care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cranley, Lisa A., Slaughter, Susan E., Caspar, Sienna, Heisey, Melissa, Huang, Mei, Killackey, Tieghan, McGilton, Katherine S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32196984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opn.12314
_version_ 1783585180237168640
author Cranley, Lisa A.
Slaughter, Susan E.
Caspar, Sienna
Heisey, Melissa
Huang, Mei
Killackey, Tieghan
McGilton, Katherine S.
author_facet Cranley, Lisa A.
Slaughter, Susan E.
Caspar, Sienna
Heisey, Melissa
Huang, Mei
Killackey, Tieghan
McGilton, Katherine S.
author_sort Cranley, Lisa A.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to explore shared decision‐making among residents, their families and staff to determine relevant strategies to support shared decision‐making in long‐term care (LTC). BACKGROUND: Meaningful engagement of long‐term care home (LTCH) residents and their families in care decisions is key in the provision of quality of care. Shared decision‐making is an interprofessional approach to increasing resident and family engagement in care decisions which can lead to higher quality decisions, more relevant care interventions and greater resident, family, and staff satisfaction. Despite these advantages, shared decision‐making has not been widely implemented in practice in LTC. METHODS: The study took place in one LTCH in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore how residents, family members and staff described how they collaborate when making decisions concerning resident care, and their perceptions of facilitators and challenges to a collaborative approach to decision‐making. Individual interviews were conducted with nine participants: residents, families and staff. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four main themes that described resident, family and staff perspectives of shared decision‐making were as follows: (a) oral communication pathways for information sharing; (b) supporting resident decision‐making autonomy; (c) relational aspects of care facilitate shared decision‐making; and (d) lack of effective communication creates barriers to shared decision‐making. CONCLUSION: As the demand for LTC continues to increase, it is crucial that healthcare providers engage in collaborative, relational practices that foster high‐quality resident care. While a relational approach to care can facilitate shared decision‐making, there are opportunities to further cultivate shared decision‐making in LTCHs through more effective communication and collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding how information is shared and decisions are made can facilitate shared decision‐making in LTCHs. The strategies identified from this study could be further co‐developed and implemented in LTCHs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75071872020-09-28 Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care Cranley, Lisa A. Slaughter, Susan E. Caspar, Sienna Heisey, Melissa Huang, Mei Killackey, Tieghan McGilton, Katherine S. Int J Older People Nurs Original Articles AIM: The aim of this study was to explore shared decision‐making among residents, their families and staff to determine relevant strategies to support shared decision‐making in long‐term care (LTC). BACKGROUND: Meaningful engagement of long‐term care home (LTCH) residents and their families in care decisions is key in the provision of quality of care. Shared decision‐making is an interprofessional approach to increasing resident and family engagement in care decisions which can lead to higher quality decisions, more relevant care interventions and greater resident, family, and staff satisfaction. Despite these advantages, shared decision‐making has not been widely implemented in practice in LTC. METHODS: The study took place in one LTCH in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore how residents, family members and staff described how they collaborate when making decisions concerning resident care, and their perceptions of facilitators and challenges to a collaborative approach to decision‐making. Individual interviews were conducted with nine participants: residents, families and staff. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four main themes that described resident, family and staff perspectives of shared decision‐making were as follows: (a) oral communication pathways for information sharing; (b) supporting resident decision‐making autonomy; (c) relational aspects of care facilitate shared decision‐making; and (d) lack of effective communication creates barriers to shared decision‐making. CONCLUSION: As the demand for LTC continues to increase, it is crucial that healthcare providers engage in collaborative, relational practices that foster high‐quality resident care. While a relational approach to care can facilitate shared decision‐making, there are opportunities to further cultivate shared decision‐making in LTCHs through more effective communication and collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding how information is shared and decisions are made can facilitate shared decision‐making in LTCHs. The strategies identified from this study could be further co‐developed and implemented in LTCHs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-20 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7507187/ /pubmed/32196984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opn.12314 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Older People Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cranley, Lisa A.
Slaughter, Susan E.
Caspar, Sienna
Heisey, Melissa
Huang, Mei
Killackey, Tieghan
McGilton, Katherine S.
Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title_full Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title_fullStr Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title_short Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
title_sort strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32196984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opn.12314
work_keys_str_mv AT cranleylisaa strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT slaughtersusane strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT casparsienna strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT heiseymelissa strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT huangmei strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT killackeytieghan strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare
AT mcgiltonkatherines strategiestofacilitateshareddecisionmakinginlongtermcare