Cargando…

Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls

Various nanomedicinal products (NMPs) have been reported to induce an adverse immune response, which may be related to their tendency to accumulate in or target cells of the immune system. Therefore, before their market authorization, NMPs should be thoroughly evaluated for their immunotoxic potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giannakou, Christina, Park, Margriet V. D. Z., Bosselaers, Irene E. M., de Jong, Wim H., van der Laan, Jan Willem, van Loveren, Henk, Vandebriel, Rob J., Geertsma, Robert E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1633
_version_ 1783585182837637120
author Giannakou, Christina
Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
Bosselaers, Irene E. M.
de Jong, Wim H.
van der Laan, Jan Willem
van Loveren, Henk
Vandebriel, Rob J.
Geertsma, Robert E.
author_facet Giannakou, Christina
Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
Bosselaers, Irene E. M.
de Jong, Wim H.
van der Laan, Jan Willem
van Loveren, Henk
Vandebriel, Rob J.
Geertsma, Robert E.
author_sort Giannakou, Christina
collection PubMed
description Various nanomedicinal products (NMPs) have been reported to induce an adverse immune response, which may be related to their tendency to accumulate in or target cells of the immune system. Therefore, before their market authorization, NMPs should be thoroughly evaluated for their immunotoxic potential. Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nonbiological medicinal products, including NMPs, is currently performed by following the guideline S8 “Immunotoxicity Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals” of the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). However, this guideline does not cover all the immunotoxicity endpoints reported for NMPs in the literature, such as complement activation related pseudo allergy, hypersensitivity and immunosuppression. In addition, ICH‐S8 does not provide any nanospecific testing considerations, which is important given their tendency to interfere with many commonly used toxicity assays. We therefore propose a nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity assessment strategy, which considers the immunotoxicity endpoints currently missing in the ICH‐S8. We also list the known pitfalls related to the testing of NMPs and how to tackle them. Next to defining the relevant physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the NMP and its intended use, the proposed strategy includes an in vitro assay battery addressing various relevant immunotoxicity endpoints. A weight of evidence evaluation of this information can be used to shape the type and design of further in vivo investigations. The final outcome of the immunotoxicity assessment can be included in the overall risk assessment of the NMP and provide alerts for relevant endpoints to address during clinical investigation. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine. Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75071982020-09-28 Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls Giannakou, Christina Park, Margriet V. D. Z. Bosselaers, Irene E. M. de Jong, Wim H. van der Laan, Jan Willem van Loveren, Henk Vandebriel, Rob J. Geertsma, Robert E. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol Advanced Reviews Various nanomedicinal products (NMPs) have been reported to induce an adverse immune response, which may be related to their tendency to accumulate in or target cells of the immune system. Therefore, before their market authorization, NMPs should be thoroughly evaluated for their immunotoxic potential. Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nonbiological medicinal products, including NMPs, is currently performed by following the guideline S8 “Immunotoxicity Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals” of the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). However, this guideline does not cover all the immunotoxicity endpoints reported for NMPs in the literature, such as complement activation related pseudo allergy, hypersensitivity and immunosuppression. In addition, ICH‐S8 does not provide any nanospecific testing considerations, which is important given their tendency to interfere with many commonly used toxicity assays. We therefore propose a nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity assessment strategy, which considers the immunotoxicity endpoints currently missing in the ICH‐S8. We also list the known pitfalls related to the testing of NMPs and how to tackle them. Next to defining the relevant physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the NMP and its intended use, the proposed strategy includes an in vitro assay battery addressing various relevant immunotoxicity endpoints. A weight of evidence evaluation of this information can be used to shape the type and design of further in vivo investigations. The final outcome of the immunotoxicity assessment can be included in the overall risk assessment of the NMP and provide alerts for relevant endpoints to address during clinical investigation. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine. Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7507198/ /pubmed/32266791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1633 Text en © 2020 The Authors. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Advanced Reviews
Giannakou, Christina
Park, Margriet V. D. Z.
Bosselaers, Irene E. M.
de Jong, Wim H.
van der Laan, Jan Willem
van Loveren, Henk
Vandebriel, Rob J.
Geertsma, Robert E.
Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title_full Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title_fullStr Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title_short Nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: Proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
title_sort nonclinical regulatory immunotoxicity testing of nanomedicinal products: proposed strategy and possible pitfalls
topic Advanced Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1633
work_keys_str_mv AT giannakouchristina nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT parkmargrietvdz nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT bosselaersireneem nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT dejongwimh nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT vanderlaanjanwillem nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT vanloverenhenk nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT vandebrielrobj nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls
AT geertsmaroberte nonclinicalregulatoryimmunotoxicitytestingofnanomedicinalproductsproposedstrategyandpossiblepitfalls