Cargando…

Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing

BACKGROUND: Prezygotic de novo mutations may be inherited from parents with germline mosaicism and are often overlooked when the resulting phenotype affects only one child. We aimed to identify paternal germline mosaicism in an index family and provide a strategy to determine germline mosaicism.‘ ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Congling, Cheng, Dehua, Li, Weina, Zeng, Sicong, Lu, Guangxiu, Zhang, Qianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1394
_version_ 1783585213854515200
author Dai, Congling
Cheng, Dehua
Li, Weina
Zeng, Sicong
Lu, Guangxiu
Zhang, Qianjun
author_facet Dai, Congling
Cheng, Dehua
Li, Weina
Zeng, Sicong
Lu, Guangxiu
Zhang, Qianjun
author_sort Dai, Congling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prezygotic de novo mutations may be inherited from parents with germline mosaicism and are often overlooked when the resulting phenotype affects only one child. We aimed to identify paternal germline mosaicism in an index family and provide a strategy to determine germline mosaicism.‘ METHODS: Whole‐exome sequencing was performed on an Alport syndrome‐affected child. Variants were validated using Sanger sequencing in the pedigree analysis. An apparent de novo mutation was tested by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) following chromosome microdissection of the mutant region (MicroSeq) to clarify its homologous chromosome source. Mosaic mutation in sperm samples was detected using targeted next‐generation sequencing (TNGS). Self‐prepared mosaic DNA samples of the 3% and 0.1% mutant fractions were used to evaluate the TNGS detection sensitivity. RESULTS: Two novel heterozygous variants, maternally inherited c.1322delT (p.Ile441Thrfs*17) and the de novo mutation c.2939T>A (p.Leu980Ter), in the COL4A3 gene were discovered in the propositus. MicroSeq identified c.2939T>A in the paternal chromosome, which was in trans with c.1322delT. The frequency of c.2937A was 2.65% in the father's sperm sample. We also showed that a 500X depth coverage may detect a mosaic mutation with an allele frequency as low as 2%–3% using TNGS. CONCLUSION: MicroSeq is a valuable tool to identify the allele source of de novo mutations in a single patient. TNGS can be used to assess the mosaic ratios of known sites. We provided a systematic algorithm to detect germinal mosaicism in a single patient. This algorithm may have implications for genetic and reproductive counseling on germline mosaicism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75073702020-09-28 Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing Dai, Congling Cheng, Dehua Li, Weina Zeng, Sicong Lu, Guangxiu Zhang, Qianjun Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Prezygotic de novo mutations may be inherited from parents with germline mosaicism and are often overlooked when the resulting phenotype affects only one child. We aimed to identify paternal germline mosaicism in an index family and provide a strategy to determine germline mosaicism.‘ METHODS: Whole‐exome sequencing was performed on an Alport syndrome‐affected child. Variants were validated using Sanger sequencing in the pedigree analysis. An apparent de novo mutation was tested by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) following chromosome microdissection of the mutant region (MicroSeq) to clarify its homologous chromosome source. Mosaic mutation in sperm samples was detected using targeted next‐generation sequencing (TNGS). Self‐prepared mosaic DNA samples of the 3% and 0.1% mutant fractions were used to evaluate the TNGS detection sensitivity. RESULTS: Two novel heterozygous variants, maternally inherited c.1322delT (p.Ile441Thrfs*17) and the de novo mutation c.2939T>A (p.Leu980Ter), in the COL4A3 gene were discovered in the propositus. MicroSeq identified c.2939T>A in the paternal chromosome, which was in trans with c.1322delT. The frequency of c.2937A was 2.65% in the father's sperm sample. We also showed that a 500X depth coverage may detect a mosaic mutation with an allele frequency as low as 2%–3% using TNGS. CONCLUSION: MicroSeq is a valuable tool to identify the allele source of de novo mutations in a single patient. TNGS can be used to assess the mosaic ratios of known sites. We provided a systematic algorithm to detect germinal mosaicism in a single patient. This algorithm may have implications for genetic and reproductive counseling on germline mosaicism. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7507370/ /pubmed/32643877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1394 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dai, Congling
Cheng, Dehua
Li, Weina
Zeng, Sicong
Lu, Guangxiu
Zhang, Qianjun
Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title_full Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title_fullStr Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title_short Identification of paternal germline mosaicism by MicroSeq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
title_sort identification of paternal germline mosaicism by microseq and targeted next‐generation sequencing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1394
work_keys_str_mv AT daicongling identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing
AT chengdehua identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing
AT liweina identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing
AT zengsicong identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing
AT luguangxiu identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing
AT zhangqianjun identificationofpaternalgermlinemosaicismbymicroseqandtargetednextgenerationsequencing