Cargando…

Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that simultaneous resection of both primary colorectal lesion and metastatic hepatic lesion is a safe approach with low mortality and postoperative complication rates. However, there are some controversies over which kind of surgical approach is better. The aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Long, Tong, Chenhao, Fu, Siyuan, Fang, Jing, Gu, Qiuxia, Wang, Shufeng, Jiang, Zhiyu, Juengpanich, Sarun, Cai, Xiujun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z
_version_ 1783585267410534400
author Pan, Long
Tong, Chenhao
Fu, Siyuan
Fang, Jing
Gu, Qiuxia
Wang, Shufeng
Jiang, Zhiyu
Juengpanich, Sarun
Cai, Xiujun
author_facet Pan, Long
Tong, Chenhao
Fu, Siyuan
Fang, Jing
Gu, Qiuxia
Wang, Shufeng
Jiang, Zhiyu
Juengpanich, Sarun
Cai, Xiujun
author_sort Pan, Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that simultaneous resection of both primary colorectal lesion and metastatic hepatic lesion is a safe approach with low mortality and postoperative complication rates. However, there are some controversies over which kind of surgical approach is better. The aim of study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgeries and open surgeries for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM). METHODS: A systemic search of online database including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed until June 5, 2019. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were synthesized by using STATA, version 15.0. Cumulative and single-arm meta-analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: It contained twelve studies with 616 patients (273 vs 343, laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, respectively) and manifested latest surgical results for the treatment of CRC and SCRLM. Among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries, they had lower rates of postoperative complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028), less intraoperative blood loss (weight mean difference (WMD) = − 113.31, 95% CI: − 189.03 to − 37.59, P = 0.003), less time in the hospital and recovering after surgeries (WMD = − 2.70, 95% CI: − 3.99 to − 1.40, P = 0.000; WMD = − 3.20, 95% CI: − 5.06 to − 1.34, P = 0.001), but more operating time (WMD = 36.57, 95% CI: 7.80 to 65.35, P = 0.013). Additionally, there were no statistical significance between two kinds of surgical approaches in disease-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, cumulative meta-analysis indicated statistical difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery in terms of morbidity was firstly detected in the 12th study in 2018 (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028) as the 95% CI narrowed. CONCLUSION: Compared with open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries are safer (postoperative complications and intraoperative blood loss) and more effective (length of hospital stay and postoperative stay), and it can be considered as the first option for management of SCRLM in high-volume laparoscopic centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42020151176
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75076292020-09-23 Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis Pan, Long Tong, Chenhao Fu, Siyuan Fang, Jing Gu, Qiuxia Wang, Shufeng Jiang, Zhiyu Juengpanich, Sarun Cai, Xiujun World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that simultaneous resection of both primary colorectal lesion and metastatic hepatic lesion is a safe approach with low mortality and postoperative complication rates. However, there are some controversies over which kind of surgical approach is better. The aim of study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgeries and open surgeries for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM). METHODS: A systemic search of online database including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed until June 5, 2019. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were synthesized by using STATA, version 15.0. Cumulative and single-arm meta-analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: It contained twelve studies with 616 patients (273 vs 343, laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, respectively) and manifested latest surgical results for the treatment of CRC and SCRLM. Among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries, they had lower rates of postoperative complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028), less intraoperative blood loss (weight mean difference (WMD) = − 113.31, 95% CI: − 189.03 to − 37.59, P = 0.003), less time in the hospital and recovering after surgeries (WMD = − 2.70, 95% CI: − 3.99 to − 1.40, P = 0.000; WMD = − 3.20, 95% CI: − 5.06 to − 1.34, P = 0.001), but more operating time (WMD = 36.57, 95% CI: 7.80 to 65.35, P = 0.013). Additionally, there were no statistical significance between two kinds of surgical approaches in disease-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, cumulative meta-analysis indicated statistical difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery in terms of morbidity was firstly detected in the 12th study in 2018 (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028) as the 95% CI narrowed. CONCLUSION: Compared with open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries are safer (postoperative complications and intraoperative blood loss) and more effective (length of hospital stay and postoperative stay), and it can be considered as the first option for management of SCRLM in high-volume laparoscopic centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42020151176 BioMed Central 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7507629/ /pubmed/32958079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pan, Long
Tong, Chenhao
Fu, Siyuan
Fang, Jing
Gu, Qiuxia
Wang, Shufeng
Jiang, Zhiyu
Juengpanich, Sarun
Cai, Xiujun
Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title_full Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title_short Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
title_sort laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z
work_keys_str_mv AT panlong laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT tongchenhao laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT fusiyuan laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT fangjing laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT guqiuxia laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT wangshufeng laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT jiangzhiyu laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT juengpanichsarun laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT caixiujun laparoscopicprocedureisassociatedwithlowermorbidityforsimultaneousresectionofcolorectalcancerandlivermetastasesanupdatedmetaanalysis