Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events
The Vlasiator hybrid‐Vlasov code was developed to investigate global magnetospheric dynamics at ion‐kinetic scales. Here we focus on the role of magnetic reconnection in the formation and evolution of magnetic islands at the low‐latitude magnetopause, under southward interplanetary magnetic field co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027410 |
_version_ | 1783585293713014784 |
---|---|
author | Akhavan‐Tafti, M. Palmroth, M. Slavin, J. A. Battarbee, M. Ganse, U. Grandin, M. Le, G. Gershman, D. J. Eastwood, J. P. Stawarz, J. E. |
author_facet | Akhavan‐Tafti, M. Palmroth, M. Slavin, J. A. Battarbee, M. Ganse, U. Grandin, M. Le, G. Gershman, D. J. Eastwood, J. P. Stawarz, J. E. |
author_sort | Akhavan‐Tafti, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Vlasiator hybrid‐Vlasov code was developed to investigate global magnetospheric dynamics at ion‐kinetic scales. Here we focus on the role of magnetic reconnection in the formation and evolution of magnetic islands at the low‐latitude magnetopause, under southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. The simulation results indicate that (1) the magnetic reconnection ion kinetics, including the Earthward pointing Larmor electric field on the magnetospheric side of an X‐point and anisotropic ion distributions, are well‐captured by Vlasiator, thus enabling the study of reconnection‐driven magnetic island evolution processes, (2) magnetic islands evolve due to continuous reconnection at adjacent X‐points, “coalescence” which refers to the merging of neighboring islands to create a larger island, “erosion” during which an island loses magnetic flux due to reconnection, and “division” which involves the splitting of an island into smaller islands, and (3) continuous reconnection at adjacent X‐points is the dominant source of magnetic flux and plasma to the outer layers of magnetic islands resulting in cross‐sectional growth rates up to + 0.3 R(E) (2)/min. The simulation results are compared to the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) measurements of a chain of ion‐scale flux transfer events (FTEs) sandwiched between two dominant X‐lines. The MMS measurements similarly reveal (1) anisotropic ion populations and (2) normalized reconnection rate ~0.18, in agreement with theory and the Vlasiator predictions. Based on the simulation results and the MMS measurements, it is estimated that the observed ion‐scale FTEs may grow Earth‐sized within ~10 min, which is comparable to the average transport time for FTEs formed in the subsolar region to the high‐latitude magnetopause. Future simulations shall revisit reconnection‐driven island evolution processes with improved spatial resolutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7507759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75077592020-09-28 Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events Akhavan‐Tafti, M. Palmroth, M. Slavin, J. A. Battarbee, M. Ganse, U. Grandin, M. Le, G. Gershman, D. J. Eastwood, J. P. Stawarz, J. E. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Articles The Vlasiator hybrid‐Vlasov code was developed to investigate global magnetospheric dynamics at ion‐kinetic scales. Here we focus on the role of magnetic reconnection in the formation and evolution of magnetic islands at the low‐latitude magnetopause, under southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. The simulation results indicate that (1) the magnetic reconnection ion kinetics, including the Earthward pointing Larmor electric field on the magnetospheric side of an X‐point and anisotropic ion distributions, are well‐captured by Vlasiator, thus enabling the study of reconnection‐driven magnetic island evolution processes, (2) magnetic islands evolve due to continuous reconnection at adjacent X‐points, “coalescence” which refers to the merging of neighboring islands to create a larger island, “erosion” during which an island loses magnetic flux due to reconnection, and “division” which involves the splitting of an island into smaller islands, and (3) continuous reconnection at adjacent X‐points is the dominant source of magnetic flux and plasma to the outer layers of magnetic islands resulting in cross‐sectional growth rates up to + 0.3 R(E) (2)/min. The simulation results are compared to the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) measurements of a chain of ion‐scale flux transfer events (FTEs) sandwiched between two dominant X‐lines. The MMS measurements similarly reveal (1) anisotropic ion populations and (2) normalized reconnection rate ~0.18, in agreement with theory and the Vlasiator predictions. Based on the simulation results and the MMS measurements, it is estimated that the observed ion‐scale FTEs may grow Earth‐sized within ~10 min, which is comparable to the average transport time for FTEs formed in the subsolar region to the high‐latitude magnetopause. Future simulations shall revisit reconnection‐driven island evolution processes with improved spatial resolutions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-22 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7507759/ /pubmed/32999805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027410 Text en ©2020. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Akhavan‐Tafti, M. Palmroth, M. Slavin, J. A. Battarbee, M. Ganse, U. Grandin, M. Le, G. Gershman, D. J. Eastwood, J. P. Stawarz, J. E. Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title | Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X‐Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the vlasiator simulations and mms observations of multiple x‐line reconnection and flux transfer events |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akhavantaftim comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT palmrothm comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT slavinja comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT battarbeem comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT ganseu comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT grandinm comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT leg comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT gershmandj comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT eastwoodjp comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents AT stawarzje comparativeanalysisofthevlasiatorsimulationsandmmsobservationsofmultiplexlinereconnectionandfluxtransferevents |