Cargando…
Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions
Comprehensive analysis of remote sensing data used to select the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) landing site correctly predicted the atmospheric temperature and pressure profile during entry and descent, the safe landing surface, and the geolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006502 |
_version_ | 1783585293963624448 |
---|---|
author | Golombek, M. Kass, D. Williams, N. Warner, N. Daubar, I. Piqueux, S. Charalambous, C. Pike, W. T. |
author_facet | Golombek, M. Kass, D. Williams, N. Warner, N. Daubar, I. Piqueux, S. Charalambous, C. Pike, W. T. |
author_sort | Golombek, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Comprehensive analysis of remote sensing data used to select the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) landing site correctly predicted the atmospheric temperature and pressure profile during entry and descent, the safe landing surface, and the geologic setting of the site. The smooth plains upon which the InSight landing site is located were accurately predicted to be generally similar to the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit landing site with relatively low rock abundance, low slopes, and a moderately dusty surface with a 3–10 m impact fragmented regolith over Hesperian to Early Amazonian basaltic lava flows. The deceleration profile and surface pressure encountered by the spacecraft during entry, descent, and landing compared well (within 1σ) of the envelope of modeled temperature profiles and the expected surface pressure. Orbital estimates of thermal inertia are similar to surface radiometer measurements, and materials at the surface are dominated by poorly consolidated sand as expected. Thin coatings of bright atmospheric dust on the surface were as indicated by orbital albedo and dust cover index measurements. Orbital estimates of rock abundance from shadow measurements in high‐resolution images and thermal differencing indicated very low rock abundance and surface counts show 1–4% area covered by rocks. Slopes at 100 to 5 m length scale measured from orbital topographic and radar data correctly indicated a surface comparably smooth and flat as the two smoothest landing sites (Opportunity and Phoenix). Thermal inertia and radar data indicated the surface would be load bearing as found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7507760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75077602020-09-28 Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions Golombek, M. Kass, D. Williams, N. Warner, N. Daubar, I. Piqueux, S. Charalambous, C. Pike, W. T. J Geophys Res Planets Research Articles Comprehensive analysis of remote sensing data used to select the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) landing site correctly predicted the atmospheric temperature and pressure profile during entry and descent, the safe landing surface, and the geologic setting of the site. The smooth plains upon which the InSight landing site is located were accurately predicted to be generally similar to the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit landing site with relatively low rock abundance, low slopes, and a moderately dusty surface with a 3–10 m impact fragmented regolith over Hesperian to Early Amazonian basaltic lava flows. The deceleration profile and surface pressure encountered by the spacecraft during entry, descent, and landing compared well (within 1σ) of the envelope of modeled temperature profiles and the expected surface pressure. Orbital estimates of thermal inertia are similar to surface radiometer measurements, and materials at the surface are dominated by poorly consolidated sand as expected. Thin coatings of bright atmospheric dust on the surface were as indicated by orbital albedo and dust cover index measurements. Orbital estimates of rock abundance from shadow measurements in high‐resolution images and thermal differencing indicated very low rock abundance and surface counts show 1–4% area covered by rocks. Slopes at 100 to 5 m length scale measured from orbital topographic and radar data correctly indicated a surface comparably smooth and flat as the two smoothest landing sites (Opportunity and Phoenix). Thermal inertia and radar data indicated the surface would be load bearing as found. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-07 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7507760/ /pubmed/32999801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006502 Text en ©2020. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Golombek, M. Kass, D. Williams, N. Warner, N. Daubar, I. Piqueux, S. Charalambous, C. Pike, W. T. Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title | Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title_full | Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title_fullStr | Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title_short | Assessment of InSight Landing Site Predictions |
title_sort | assessment of insight landing site predictions |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golombekm assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT kassd assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT williamsn assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT warnern assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT daubari assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT piqueuxs assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT charalambousc assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions AT pikewt assessmentofinsightlandingsitepredictions |