Cargando…

The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool

A new model validation and performance assessment tool is introduced, the sliding threshold of observation for numeric evaluation (STONE) curve. It is based on the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique, but instead of sorting all observations in a categorical classification, the ST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liemohn, Michael W., Azari, Abigail R., Ganushkina, Natalia Y., Rastätter, Lutz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001106
_version_ 1783585297795121152
author Liemohn, Michael W.
Azari, Abigail R.
Ganushkina, Natalia Y.
Rastätter, Lutz
author_facet Liemohn, Michael W.
Azari, Abigail R.
Ganushkina, Natalia Y.
Rastätter, Lutz
author_sort Liemohn, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description A new model validation and performance assessment tool is introduced, the sliding threshold of observation for numeric evaluation (STONE) curve. It is based on the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique, but instead of sorting all observations in a categorical classification, the STONE tool uses the continuous nature of the observations. Rather than defining events in the observations and then sliding the threshold only in the classifier/model data set, the threshold is changed simultaneously for both the observational and model values, with the same threshold value for both data and model. This is only possible if the observations are continuous and the model output is in the same units and scale as the observations, that is, the model is trying to exactly reproduce the data. The STONE curve has several similarities with the ROC curve—plotting probability of detection against probability of false detection, ranging from the (1,1) corner for low thresholds to the (0,0) corner for high thresholds, and values above the zero‐intercept unity‐slope line indicating better than random predictive ability. The main difference is that the STONE curve can be nonmonotonic, doubling back in both the x and y directions. These ripples reveal asymmetries in the data‐model value pairs. This new technique is applied to modeling output of a common geomagnetic activity index as well as energetic electron fluxes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. It is not limited to space physics applications but can be used for any scientific or engineering field where numerical models are used to reproduce observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75077782020-09-28 The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool Liemohn, Michael W. Azari, Abigail R. Ganushkina, Natalia Y. Rastätter, Lutz Earth Space Sci Technical Reports: Methods A new model validation and performance assessment tool is introduced, the sliding threshold of observation for numeric evaluation (STONE) curve. It is based on the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique, but instead of sorting all observations in a categorical classification, the STONE tool uses the continuous nature of the observations. Rather than defining events in the observations and then sliding the threshold only in the classifier/model data set, the threshold is changed simultaneously for both the observational and model values, with the same threshold value for both data and model. This is only possible if the observations are continuous and the model output is in the same units and scale as the observations, that is, the model is trying to exactly reproduce the data. The STONE curve has several similarities with the ROC curve—plotting probability of detection against probability of false detection, ranging from the (1,1) corner for low thresholds to the (0,0) corner for high thresholds, and values above the zero‐intercept unity‐slope line indicating better than random predictive ability. The main difference is that the STONE curve can be nonmonotonic, doubling back in both the x and y directions. These ripples reveal asymmetries in the data‐model value pairs. This new technique is applied to modeling output of a common geomagnetic activity index as well as energetic electron fluxes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. It is not limited to space physics applications but can be used for any scientific or engineering field where numerical models are used to reproduce observations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-20 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7507778/ /pubmed/32999898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001106 Text en ©2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Reports: Methods
Liemohn, Michael W.
Azari, Abigail R.
Ganushkina, Natalia Y.
Rastätter, Lutz
The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title_full The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title_fullStr The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title_full_unstemmed The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title_short The STONE Curve: A ROC‐Derived Model Performance Assessment Tool
title_sort stone curve: a roc‐derived model performance assessment tool
topic Technical Reports: Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001106
work_keys_str_mv AT liemohnmichaelw thestonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT azariabigailr thestonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT ganushkinanataliay thestonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT rastatterlutz thestonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT liemohnmichaelw stonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT azariabigailr stonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT ganushkinanataliay stonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool
AT rastatterlutz stonecurvearocderivedmodelperformanceassessmenttool