Cargando…

Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?

The increasing frequency of droughts and floods on grasslands, due to climate change, increases the risk of soil compaction. Soil compaction affects both soil and forage productivity. Differing grasses may counteract some effects of compaction due to differences in their root architecture and ontoge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K., Humphreys, Mike W., Fychan, Rhun, Davies, John W., Sanderson, Ruth, Marley, Christina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.227
_version_ 1783585299394199552
author Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K.
Humphreys, Mike W.
Fychan, Rhun
Davies, John W.
Sanderson, Ruth
Marley, Christina L.
author_facet Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K.
Humphreys, Mike W.
Fychan, Rhun
Davies, John W.
Sanderson, Ruth
Marley, Christina L.
author_sort Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K.
collection PubMed
description The increasing frequency of droughts and floods on grasslands, due to climate change, increases the risk of soil compaction. Soil compaction affects both soil and forage productivity. Differing grasses may counteract some effects of compaction due to differences in their root architecture and ontogeny. To compare their resilience to soil compaction, three Festulolium (ryegrass and fescue species’ hybrids) forage grass cultivars comprising differing root architecture and ontogeny were compared in replicated field plots, together with a ryegrass and tall fescue variety as controls. Pre‐compaction soil and forage properties were determined in spring using > four‐year‐old plots to generate baseline data. Half of each field plot was then artificially compacted using farm machinery. Forage dry matter yield (DMY) was determined over four cuts. After the final harvest, post compaction soil characteristics and root biomass (RB) were compared between grasses in the non‐compacted and compacted soils. Pre‐compaction data showed that soil under Festulolium and ryegrass had similar water infiltration rates, higher than soil under tall fescue plots. Tiller density of the Festulolium at this time was significantly higher than fescue but not the ryegrass control. Forage DMY was significantly lower (p < .001) with compacted soil at the first cut but, by the completion of the growing season, there was no effect of soil compaction on total DMY. Tall fescue had a higher total DMY than other grasses, which all produced similar annual yields. Soil bulk density and penetration resistance were higher, and grass tiller density was lower in compacted soils. Root biomass in compacted soils showed a tendency for Festulolium cv Lp × Fg to have higher RB than the ryegrass at 0–15 cm depth. Overall, findings showed alternative grass root structures provide differing resilience to machinery compaction, and root biomass production can be encouraged without negative impacts on forage productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75077842020-09-28 Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction? Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K. Humphreys, Mike W. Fychan, Rhun Davies, John W. Sanderson, Ruth Marley, Christina L. Food Energy Secur Original Research The increasing frequency of droughts and floods on grasslands, due to climate change, increases the risk of soil compaction. Soil compaction affects both soil and forage productivity. Differing grasses may counteract some effects of compaction due to differences in their root architecture and ontogeny. To compare their resilience to soil compaction, three Festulolium (ryegrass and fescue species’ hybrids) forage grass cultivars comprising differing root architecture and ontogeny were compared in replicated field plots, together with a ryegrass and tall fescue variety as controls. Pre‐compaction soil and forage properties were determined in spring using > four‐year‐old plots to generate baseline data. Half of each field plot was then artificially compacted using farm machinery. Forage dry matter yield (DMY) was determined over four cuts. After the final harvest, post compaction soil characteristics and root biomass (RB) were compared between grasses in the non‐compacted and compacted soils. Pre‐compaction data showed that soil under Festulolium and ryegrass had similar water infiltration rates, higher than soil under tall fescue plots. Tiller density of the Festulolium at this time was significantly higher than fescue but not the ryegrass control. Forage DMY was significantly lower (p < .001) with compacted soil at the first cut but, by the completion of the growing season, there was no effect of soil compaction on total DMY. Tall fescue had a higher total DMY than other grasses, which all produced similar annual yields. Soil bulk density and penetration resistance were higher, and grass tiller density was lower in compacted soils. Root biomass in compacted soils showed a tendency for Festulolium cv Lp × Fg to have higher RB than the ryegrass at 0–15 cm depth. Overall, findings showed alternative grass root structures provide differing resilience to machinery compaction, and root biomass production can be encouraged without negative impacts on forage productivity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-05 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7507784/ /pubmed/32999718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.227 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. and the Association of Applied Biologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Muhandiram, Nuwan P.K.
Humphreys, Mike W.
Fychan, Rhun
Davies, John W.
Sanderson, Ruth
Marley, Christina L.
Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title_full Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title_fullStr Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title_full_unstemmed Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title_short Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
title_sort do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery‐derived soil compaction?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.227
work_keys_str_mv AT muhandiramnuwanpk doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction
AT humphreysmikew doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction
AT fychanrhun doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction
AT daviesjohnw doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction
AT sandersonruth doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction
AT marleychristinal doagriculturalgrassesbredforimprovedrootsystemsprovideresiliencetomachineryderivedsoilcompaction