A squib on anaphora and coindexing

There are two kinds of semantic theories of anaphora. Some, such as Heim’s File Change Semantics, Groenendijk and Stokhof’s Dynamic Predicate Logic, or Muskens’ Compositional DRT (CDRT), seem to require full coindexing of anaphora and their antecedents prior to interpretation. Others, such as Kamp’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Muskens, Reinhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9091-8
_version_ 1783585332309000192
author Muskens, Reinhard
author_facet Muskens, Reinhard
author_sort Muskens, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description There are two kinds of semantic theories of anaphora. Some, such as Heim’s File Change Semantics, Groenendijk and Stokhof’s Dynamic Predicate Logic, or Muskens’ Compositional DRT (CDRT), seem to require full coindexing of anaphora and their antecedents prior to interpretation. Others, such as Kamp’s Discourse Representation Theory (DRT), do not require this coindexing and seem to have an important advantage here. In this squib I will sketch a procedure that the first group of theories may help themselves to so that they can interleave interpretation and coindexing in DRT’s way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7507939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75079392020-09-23 A squib on anaphora and coindexing Muskens, Reinhard Linguist Philos Research Article There are two kinds of semantic theories of anaphora. Some, such as Heim’s File Change Semantics, Groenendijk and Stokhof’s Dynamic Predicate Logic, or Muskens’ Compositional DRT (CDRT), seem to require full coindexing of anaphora and their antecedents prior to interpretation. Others, such as Kamp’s Discourse Representation Theory (DRT), do not require this coindexing and seem to have an important advantage here. In this squib I will sketch a procedure that the first group of theories may help themselves to so that they can interleave interpretation and coindexing in DRT’s way. Springer Netherlands 2011-02-01 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC7507939/ /pubmed/32981993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9091-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muskens, Reinhard
A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title_full A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title_fullStr A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title_full_unstemmed A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title_short A squib on anaphora and coindexing
title_sort squib on anaphora and coindexing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7507939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9091-8
work_keys_str_mv AT muskensreinhard asquibonanaphoraandcoindexing
AT muskensreinhard squibonanaphoraandcoindexing

Ejemplares similares