Cargando…
Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliabi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153 |
_version_ | 1783585397113094144 |
---|---|
author | Vaccaro, Alexander R. Schroeder, Gregory D. Divi, Srikanth N. Kepler, Christopher K. Kleweno, Conor P. Krieg, James C. Wilson, Jefferson R. Holstein, Jörg H. Kurd, Mark F. Firoozabadi, Reza Vialle, Luiz R. Oner, F. Cumhur Kandziora, Frank Chapman, Jens R. Schnake, Klaus J. Benneker, Lorin M. Dvorak, Marcel F. Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Vialle, Emiliano N. Joaquim, Andrei F. El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa Dhakal, Gaurav R. Popescu, Eugen C. Kanna, Rishi M. Muijs, S.P.J. Tee, Jin W. Bellabarba, Carlo |
author_facet | Vaccaro, Alexander R. Schroeder, Gregory D. Divi, Srikanth N. Kepler, Christopher K. Kleweno, Conor P. Krieg, James C. Wilson, Jefferson R. Holstein, Jörg H. Kurd, Mark F. Firoozabadi, Reza Vialle, Luiz R. Oner, F. Cumhur Kandziora, Frank Chapman, Jens R. Schnake, Klaus J. Benneker, Lorin M. Dvorak, Marcel F. Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Vialle, Emiliano N. Joaquim, Andrei F. El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa Dhakal, Gaurav R. Popescu, Eugen C. Kanna, Rishi M. Muijs, S.P.J. Tee, Jin W. Bellabarba, Carlo |
author_sort | Vaccaro, Alexander R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7508295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75082952020-09-24 Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System Vaccaro, Alexander R. Schroeder, Gregory D. Divi, Srikanth N. Kepler, Christopher K. Kleweno, Conor P. Krieg, James C. Wilson, Jefferson R. Holstein, Jörg H. Kurd, Mark F. Firoozabadi, Reza Vialle, Luiz R. Oner, F. Cumhur Kandziora, Frank Chapman, Jens R. Schnake, Klaus J. Benneker, Lorin M. Dvorak, Marcel F. Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Vialle, Emiliano N. Joaquim, Andrei F. El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa Dhakal, Gaurav R. Popescu, Eugen C. Kanna, Rishi M. Muijs, S.P.J. Tee, Jin W. Bellabarba, Carlo J Bone Joint Surg Am Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-08-19 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7508295/ /pubmed/32816418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Vaccaro, Alexander R. Schroeder, Gregory D. Divi, Srikanth N. Kepler, Christopher K. Kleweno, Conor P. Krieg, James C. Wilson, Jefferson R. Holstein, Jörg H. Kurd, Mark F. Firoozabadi, Reza Vialle, Luiz R. Oner, F. Cumhur Kandziora, Frank Chapman, Jens R. Schnake, Klaus J. Benneker, Lorin M. Dvorak, Marcel F. Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Vialle, Emiliano N. Joaquim, Andrei F. El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa Dhakal, Gaurav R. Popescu, Eugen C. Kanna, Rishi M. Muijs, S.P.J. Tee, Jin W. Bellabarba, Carlo Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title | Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title_full | Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title_fullStr | Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title_full_unstemmed | Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title_short | Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System |
title_sort | description and reliability of the aospine sacral classification system |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaccaroalexanderr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT schroedergregoryd descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT divisrikanthn descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT keplerchristopherk descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT klewenoconorp descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT kriegjamesc descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT wilsonjeffersonr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT holsteinjorgh descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT kurdmarkf descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT firoozabadireza descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT vialleluizr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT onerfcumhur descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT kandziorafrank descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT chapmanjensr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT schnakeklausj descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT bennekerlorinm descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT dvorakmarcelf descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT vialleemilianon descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT joaquimandreif descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT elsharkawimohammadmostafa descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT dhakalgauravr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT popescueugenc descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT kannarishim descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT muijsspj descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT teejinw descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem AT bellabarbacarlo descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem |