Cargando…

Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System

BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaccaro, Alexander R., Schroeder, Gregory D., Divi, Srikanth N., Kepler, Christopher K., Kleweno, Conor P., Krieg, James C., Wilson, Jefferson R., Holstein, Jörg H., Kurd, Mark F., Firoozabadi, Reza, Vialle, Luiz R., Oner, F. Cumhur, Kandziora, Frank, Chapman, Jens R., Schnake, Klaus J., Benneker, Lorin M., Dvorak, Marcel F., Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan, Vialle, Emiliano N., Joaquim, Andrei F., El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa, Dhakal, Gaurav R., Popescu, Eugen C., Kanna, Rishi M., Muijs, S.P.J., Tee, Jin W., Bellabarba, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816418
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153
_version_ 1783585397113094144
author Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Divi, Srikanth N.
Kepler, Christopher K.
Kleweno, Conor P.
Krieg, James C.
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Holstein, Jörg H.
Kurd, Mark F.
Firoozabadi, Reza
Vialle, Luiz R.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Kandziora, Frank
Chapman, Jens R.
Schnake, Klaus J.
Benneker, Lorin M.
Dvorak, Marcel F.
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Joaquim, Andrei F.
El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa
Dhakal, Gaurav R.
Popescu, Eugen C.
Kanna, Rishi M.
Muijs, S.P.J.
Tee, Jin W.
Bellabarba, Carlo
author_facet Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Divi, Srikanth N.
Kepler, Christopher K.
Kleweno, Conor P.
Krieg, James C.
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Holstein, Jörg H.
Kurd, Mark F.
Firoozabadi, Reza
Vialle, Luiz R.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Kandziora, Frank
Chapman, Jens R.
Schnake, Klaus J.
Benneker, Lorin M.
Dvorak, Marcel F.
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Joaquim, Andrei F.
El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa
Dhakal, Gaurav R.
Popescu, Eugen C.
Kanna, Rishi M.
Muijs, S.P.J.
Tee, Jin W.
Bellabarba, Carlo
author_sort Vaccaro, Alexander R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7508295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75082952020-09-24 Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System Vaccaro, Alexander R. Schroeder, Gregory D. Divi, Srikanth N. Kepler, Christopher K. Kleweno, Conor P. Krieg, James C. Wilson, Jefferson R. Holstein, Jörg H. Kurd, Mark F. Firoozabadi, Reza Vialle, Luiz R. Oner, F. Cumhur Kandziora, Frank Chapman, Jens R. Schnake, Klaus J. Benneker, Lorin M. Dvorak, Marcel F. Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Vialle, Emiliano N. Joaquim, Andrei F. El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa Dhakal, Gaurav R. Popescu, Eugen C. Kanna, Rishi M. Muijs, S.P.J. Tee, Jin W. Bellabarba, Carlo J Bone Joint Surg Am Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-08-19 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7508295/ /pubmed/32816418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Divi, Srikanth N.
Kepler, Christopher K.
Kleweno, Conor P.
Krieg, James C.
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Holstein, Jörg H.
Kurd, Mark F.
Firoozabadi, Reza
Vialle, Luiz R.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Kandziora, Frank
Chapman, Jens R.
Schnake, Klaus J.
Benneker, Lorin M.
Dvorak, Marcel F.
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Joaquim, Andrei F.
El-Sharkawi, Mohammad Mostafa
Dhakal, Gaurav R.
Popescu, Eugen C.
Kanna, Rishi M.
Muijs, S.P.J.
Tee, Jin W.
Bellabarba, Carlo
Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title_full Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title_fullStr Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title_full_unstemmed Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title_short Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System
title_sort description and reliability of the aospine sacral classification system
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816418
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01153
work_keys_str_mv AT vaccaroalexanderr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT schroedergregoryd descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT divisrikanthn descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT keplerchristopherk descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT klewenoconorp descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT kriegjamesc descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT wilsonjeffersonr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT holsteinjorgh descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT kurdmarkf descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT firoozabadireza descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT vialleluizr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT onerfcumhur descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT kandziorafrank descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT chapmanjensr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT schnakeklausj descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT bennekerlorinm descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT dvorakmarcelf descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT vialleemilianon descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT joaquimandreif descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT elsharkawimohammadmostafa descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT dhakalgauravr descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT popescueugenc descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT kannarishim descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT muijsspj descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT teejinw descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem
AT bellabarbacarlo descriptionandreliabilityoftheaospinesacralclassificationsystem