Cargando…

Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics

Least Cost Path (LCP) analysis allows a user to define a cost parameter through which cost of movement can be assessed using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). These analyses are commonly used to construct theoretical movement through a landscape, which has been useful for creating hypotheses c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gowen, Kyle M., de Smet, Timothy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32960937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239387
_version_ 1783585414067519488
author Gowen, Kyle M.
de Smet, Timothy S.
author_facet Gowen, Kyle M.
de Smet, Timothy S.
author_sort Gowen, Kyle M.
collection PubMed
description Least Cost Path (LCP) analysis allows a user to define a cost parameter through which cost of movement can be assessed using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). These analyses are commonly used to construct theoretical movement through a landscape, which has been useful for creating hypotheses concerning prehistoric archaeology and landscape genomics. However, LCP analysis is commonly employed without testing the generated LCP(s), complicating its usefulness as a methodological tool. This paper proposes a model for analyzing movement in ArcGIS by using topography data to calculate slope. This slope data is then then used to calculate LCPs based on travel time and kilocalorie expenditure. LCPs were constructed in the Nature Preserve at Binghamton University, a 182-acre area that consists of wetland and mountainous terrain, and a Fitbit® Surge activity monitor was used to test the accuracy of the model’s predictions. Paired sample t-tests show a lack of significant difference between calculated and walked time in our analysis (p = .953), suggesting that our model can estimate travel time between two points based solely on slope of the region. Paired sample t-tests also show a lack of significant difference between calculated and observed kilocalorie expenditure (p = .930), suggesting that our model is also capable of estimating kilocalorie expenditure associated with movement between two points. Finally, paired sample t-tests confirm that straight line distances do not reflect real movement through a terrain (p = .009), highlighting the need for alternate measures of movement when analyzing the effects of local landscape on movement. Our current model shows strength in its estimations of travel time and kilocalorie expenditure based on topography of a region–future iterations of the model need to establish the statistical similarity between our model’s estimations and recorded values for walking time and kilocalorie expenditure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7508404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75084042020-10-01 Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics Gowen, Kyle M. de Smet, Timothy S. PLoS One Research Article Least Cost Path (LCP) analysis allows a user to define a cost parameter through which cost of movement can be assessed using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). These analyses are commonly used to construct theoretical movement through a landscape, which has been useful for creating hypotheses concerning prehistoric archaeology and landscape genomics. However, LCP analysis is commonly employed without testing the generated LCP(s), complicating its usefulness as a methodological tool. This paper proposes a model for analyzing movement in ArcGIS by using topography data to calculate slope. This slope data is then then used to calculate LCPs based on travel time and kilocalorie expenditure. LCPs were constructed in the Nature Preserve at Binghamton University, a 182-acre area that consists of wetland and mountainous terrain, and a Fitbit® Surge activity monitor was used to test the accuracy of the model’s predictions. Paired sample t-tests show a lack of significant difference between calculated and walked time in our analysis (p = .953), suggesting that our model can estimate travel time between two points based solely on slope of the region. Paired sample t-tests also show a lack of significant difference between calculated and observed kilocalorie expenditure (p = .930), suggesting that our model is also capable of estimating kilocalorie expenditure associated with movement between two points. Finally, paired sample t-tests confirm that straight line distances do not reflect real movement through a terrain (p = .009), highlighting the need for alternate measures of movement when analyzing the effects of local landscape on movement. Our current model shows strength in its estimations of travel time and kilocalorie expenditure based on topography of a region–future iterations of the model need to establish the statistical similarity between our model’s estimations and recorded values for walking time and kilocalorie expenditure. Public Library of Science 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7508404/ /pubmed/32960937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239387 Text en © 2020 Gowen, de Smet http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gowen, Kyle M.
de Smet, Timothy S.
Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title_full Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title_fullStr Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title_full_unstemmed Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title_short Testing least cost path (LCP) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: Implications for landscape genomics
title_sort testing least cost path (lcp) models for travel time and kilocalorie expenditure: implications for landscape genomics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32960937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239387
work_keys_str_mv AT gowenkylem testingleastcostpathlcpmodelsfortraveltimeandkilocalorieexpenditureimplicationsforlandscapegenomics
AT desmettimothys testingleastcostpathlcpmodelsfortraveltimeandkilocalorieexpenditureimplicationsforlandscapegenomics