Cargando…

Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model

Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has emerged as a threat to global health. The relationship between gepotidacin exposure and prevention of on-therapy amplification of drug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae was examined using a 7-day hollow-fiber in vitro infection model. The study design included bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: VanScoy, Brian D., Scangarella-Oman, Nicole E., Fikes, Steven, Min, Sharon, Huang, Jianzhong, Ingraham, Karen, Bhavnani, Sujata M., Conde, Haley, Ambrose, Paul G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32661002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00521-20
_version_ 1783585448224882688
author VanScoy, Brian D.
Scangarella-Oman, Nicole E.
Fikes, Steven
Min, Sharon
Huang, Jianzhong
Ingraham, Karen
Bhavnani, Sujata M.
Conde, Haley
Ambrose, Paul G.
author_facet VanScoy, Brian D.
Scangarella-Oman, Nicole E.
Fikes, Steven
Min, Sharon
Huang, Jianzhong
Ingraham, Karen
Bhavnani, Sujata M.
Conde, Haley
Ambrose, Paul G.
author_sort VanScoy, Brian D.
collection PubMed
description Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has emerged as a threat to global health. The relationship between gepotidacin exposure and prevention of on-therapy amplification of drug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae was examined using a 7-day hollow-fiber in vitro infection model. The study design included both inactive (no-treatment and ciprofloxacin) and active (ceftriaxone) control regimens. Study drug concentration-time profiles were simulated in the in vitro system for a single oral 0.5 g ciprofloxacin dose, a single intramuscular 0.25 g ceftriaxone dose, and single or two (8 to 12 h apart) oral gepotidacin doses ranging from 0.75 to 12 g. The initial bacterial burden inoculated in the model was 10(6) CFU/ml. The gepotidacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftriaxone broth MIC values for the challenge isolate (N. gonorrhoeae GSK #8) were 0.5, 2, and 0.002 mg/liter, respectively. Samples were collected for enumeration of total and drug-resistant bacterial populations and drug concentrations. The no-treatment control reached a bacterial density greater than 10(8) CFU/ml over 24 h and remained consistent over the 7-day study period. The bacterial density in the model system of the ciprofloxacin regimen matched that of the growth control throughout the study duration, while the ceftriaxone regimen sterilized the model system by the end of day 1. For gepotidacin, a full dose-response relationship was observed. While failure was observed for the 0.75-, 1.5-, and 3-g single-dose regimens, all gepotidacin single- or divided-dose regimens totaling at least 4.5 g prevented resistance amplification and sterilized the model system. These data are useful to provide gepotidacin dose selection support for treating patients with gonorrhea infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7508576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75085762020-10-02 Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model VanScoy, Brian D. Scangarella-Oman, Nicole E. Fikes, Steven Min, Sharon Huang, Jianzhong Ingraham, Karen Bhavnani, Sujata M. Conde, Haley Ambrose, Paul G. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Mechanisms of Resistance Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has emerged as a threat to global health. The relationship between gepotidacin exposure and prevention of on-therapy amplification of drug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae was examined using a 7-day hollow-fiber in vitro infection model. The study design included both inactive (no-treatment and ciprofloxacin) and active (ceftriaxone) control regimens. Study drug concentration-time profiles were simulated in the in vitro system for a single oral 0.5 g ciprofloxacin dose, a single intramuscular 0.25 g ceftriaxone dose, and single or two (8 to 12 h apart) oral gepotidacin doses ranging from 0.75 to 12 g. The initial bacterial burden inoculated in the model was 10(6) CFU/ml. The gepotidacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftriaxone broth MIC values for the challenge isolate (N. gonorrhoeae GSK #8) were 0.5, 2, and 0.002 mg/liter, respectively. Samples were collected for enumeration of total and drug-resistant bacterial populations and drug concentrations. The no-treatment control reached a bacterial density greater than 10(8) CFU/ml over 24 h and remained consistent over the 7-day study period. The bacterial density in the model system of the ciprofloxacin regimen matched that of the growth control throughout the study duration, while the ceftriaxone regimen sterilized the model system by the end of day 1. For gepotidacin, a full dose-response relationship was observed. While failure was observed for the 0.75-, 1.5-, and 3-g single-dose regimens, all gepotidacin single- or divided-dose regimens totaling at least 4.5 g prevented resistance amplification and sterilized the model system. These data are useful to provide gepotidacin dose selection support for treating patients with gonorrhea infections. American Society for Microbiology 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7508576/ /pubmed/32661002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00521-20 Text en Copyright © 2020 VanScoy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mechanisms of Resistance
VanScoy, Brian D.
Scangarella-Oman, Nicole E.
Fikes, Steven
Min, Sharon
Huang, Jianzhong
Ingraham, Karen
Bhavnani, Sujata M.
Conde, Haley
Ambrose, Paul G.
Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title_full Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title_fullStr Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title_short Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model
title_sort relationship between gepotidacin exposure and prevention of on-therapy resistance amplification in a neisseria gonorrhoeae hollow-fiber in vitro infection model
topic Mechanisms of Resistance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32661002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00521-20
work_keys_str_mv AT vanscoybriand relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT scangarellaomannicolee relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT fikessteven relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT minsharon relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT huangjianzhong relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT ingrahamkaren relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT bhavnanisujatam relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT condehaley relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel
AT ambrosepaulg relationshipbetweengepotidacinexposureandpreventionofontherapyresistanceamplificationinaneisseriagonorrhoeaehollowfiberinvitroinfectionmodel