Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images
Background and study aims Colorectal cancers (CRC) with deep submucosal invasion (T1b) could be metastatic lesions. However, endoscopic images of T1b CRC resemble those of mucosal CRCs (Tis) or with superficial invasion (T1a). The aim of this study was to develop an automatic computer-aided diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1220-6596 |
_version_ | 1783585457495343104 |
---|---|
author | Nakajima, Yuki Zhu, Xin Nemoto, Daiki Li, Qin Guo, Zhe Katsuki, Shinichi Hayashi, Yoshikazu Utano, Kenichi Aizawa, Masato Takezawa, Takahito Sagara, Yuichi Shibukawa, Goro Yamamoto, Hironori Lefor, Alan Kawarai Togashi, Kazutomo |
author_facet | Nakajima, Yuki Zhu, Xin Nemoto, Daiki Li, Qin Guo, Zhe Katsuki, Shinichi Hayashi, Yoshikazu Utano, Kenichi Aizawa, Masato Takezawa, Takahito Sagara, Yuichi Shibukawa, Goro Yamamoto, Hironori Lefor, Alan Kawarai Togashi, Kazutomo |
author_sort | Nakajima, Yuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Colorectal cancers (CRC) with deep submucosal invasion (T1b) could be metastatic lesions. However, endoscopic images of T1b CRC resemble those of mucosal CRCs (Tis) or with superficial invasion (T1a). The aim of this study was to develop an automatic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to identify T1b CRC based on plain endoscopic images. Patients and methods In two hospitals, 1839 non-magnified plain endoscopic images from 313 CRCs (Tis 134, T1a 46, T1b 56, beyond T1b 37) with sessile morphology were extracted for training. A CAD system was trained with the data augmented by rotation, saturation, resizing and exposure adjustment. Diagnostic performance was assessed using another dataset including 44 CRCs (Tis 23, T1b 21) from a third hospital. CAD generated a probability level for T1b diagnosis for each image, and > 95 % of probability level was defined as T1b. Lesions with at least one image with a probability level > 0.95 were regarded as T1b. Primary outcome is specificity. Six physicians separately read the same testing dataset. Results Specificity was 87 % (95 % confidence interval: 66–97) for CAD, 100 % (85–100) for Expert 1, 96 % (78–100) for Expert 2, 61 % (39–80) for both gastroenterology trainees, 48 % (27–69) for Novice 1 and 22 % (7–44) for Novice 2. Significant differences were observed between CAD and both novices ( P = 0.013, P = 0.0003). Other diagnostic values of CAD were slightly lower than of the two experts. Conclusions Specificity of CAD was superior to novices and possibly to gastroenterology trainees but slightly inferior to experts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7508661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75086612020-10-01 Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images Nakajima, Yuki Zhu, Xin Nemoto, Daiki Li, Qin Guo, Zhe Katsuki, Shinichi Hayashi, Yoshikazu Utano, Kenichi Aizawa, Masato Takezawa, Takahito Sagara, Yuichi Shibukawa, Goro Yamamoto, Hironori Lefor, Alan Kawarai Togashi, Kazutomo Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Colorectal cancers (CRC) with deep submucosal invasion (T1b) could be metastatic lesions. However, endoscopic images of T1b CRC resemble those of mucosal CRCs (Tis) or with superficial invasion (T1a). The aim of this study was to develop an automatic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to identify T1b CRC based on plain endoscopic images. Patients and methods In two hospitals, 1839 non-magnified plain endoscopic images from 313 CRCs (Tis 134, T1a 46, T1b 56, beyond T1b 37) with sessile morphology were extracted for training. A CAD system was trained with the data augmented by rotation, saturation, resizing and exposure adjustment. Diagnostic performance was assessed using another dataset including 44 CRCs (Tis 23, T1b 21) from a third hospital. CAD generated a probability level for T1b diagnosis for each image, and > 95 % of probability level was defined as T1b. Lesions with at least one image with a probability level > 0.95 were regarded as T1b. Primary outcome is specificity. Six physicians separately read the same testing dataset. Results Specificity was 87 % (95 % confidence interval: 66–97) for CAD, 100 % (85–100) for Expert 1, 96 % (78–100) for Expert 2, 61 % (39–80) for both gastroenterology trainees, 48 % (27–69) for Novice 1 and 22 % (7–44) for Novice 2. Significant differences were observed between CAD and both novices ( P = 0.013, P = 0.0003). Other diagnostic values of CAD were slightly lower than of the two experts. Conclusions Specificity of CAD was superior to novices and possibly to gastroenterology trainees but slightly inferior to experts. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-10 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7508661/ /pubmed/33015336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1220-6596 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nakajima, Yuki Zhu, Xin Nemoto, Daiki Li, Qin Guo, Zhe Katsuki, Shinichi Hayashi, Yoshikazu Utano, Kenichi Aizawa, Masato Takezawa, Takahito Sagara, Yuichi Shibukawa, Goro Yamamoto, Hironori Lefor, Alan Kawarai Togashi, Kazutomo Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title | Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence to identify deeply invasive colorectal cancer on non-magnified plain endoscopic images |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1220-6596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakajimayuki diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT zhuxin diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT nemotodaiki diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT liqin diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT guozhe diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT katsukishinichi diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT hayashiyoshikazu diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT utanokenichi diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT aizawamasato diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT takezawatakahito diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT sagarayuichi diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT shibukawagoro diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT yamamotohironori diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT leforalankawarai diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages AT togashikazutomo diagnosticperformanceofartificialintelligencetoidentifydeeplyinvasivecolorectalcanceronnonmagnifiedplainendoscopicimages |