Cargando…

Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study

Our aim was to investigate whether receiving a false positive (FP) cervical cytology result affected subsequent cervical cancer screening participation. This Danish nationwide register-based cohort study included 502,380 women aged 22.5–45 attending cervical cancer screening in 2012–2014 with a norm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Pernille Thordal, Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh, Tranberg, Mette, Njor, Sisse Helle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72279-x
_version_ 1783585490966937600
author Larsen, Pernille Thordal
Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh
Tranberg, Mette
Njor, Sisse Helle
author_facet Larsen, Pernille Thordal
Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh
Tranberg, Mette
Njor, Sisse Helle
author_sort Larsen, Pernille Thordal
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to investigate whether receiving a false positive (FP) cervical cytology result affected subsequent cervical cancer screening participation. This Danish nationwide register-based cohort study included 502,380 women aged 22.5–45 attending cervical cancer screening in 2012–2014 with a normal (n = 501,003) or FP (n = 1,377) cytology screening result. A FP result was defined as a cervical cytology showing high grade cytological abnormalities followed by a normal or ‘Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 1’ biopsy result. Women were categorized as subsequent participants if they had a cervical cytology within 24–42 months after their last screening or surveillance test. We compared subsequent participation among women with a normal versus a FP result, using odds ratios including 95% confidence intervals. Participation was slightly higher among women with FP results than among women with normal results (71.5% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.058). After adjustment for age and screening history, women with FP results participated significantly more than women with normal results (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.35). Women receiving a FP result did not participate less in subsequent cervical cancer screening than women receiving a normal result. In fact, the use of opportunistic screening seemed to be increased among women receiving a FP result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7508879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75088792020-09-24 Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study Larsen, Pernille Thordal Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh Tranberg, Mette Njor, Sisse Helle Sci Rep Article Our aim was to investigate whether receiving a false positive (FP) cervical cytology result affected subsequent cervical cancer screening participation. This Danish nationwide register-based cohort study included 502,380 women aged 22.5–45 attending cervical cancer screening in 2012–2014 with a normal (n = 501,003) or FP (n = 1,377) cytology screening result. A FP result was defined as a cervical cytology showing high grade cytological abnormalities followed by a normal or ‘Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 1’ biopsy result. Women were categorized as subsequent participants if they had a cervical cytology within 24–42 months after their last screening or surveillance test. We compared subsequent participation among women with a normal versus a FP result, using odds ratios including 95% confidence intervals. Participation was slightly higher among women with FP results than among women with normal results (71.5% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.058). After adjustment for age and screening history, women with FP results participated significantly more than women with normal results (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.35). Women receiving a FP result did not participate less in subsequent cervical cancer screening than women receiving a normal result. In fact, the use of opportunistic screening seemed to be increased among women receiving a FP result. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7508879/ /pubmed/32963299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72279-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Larsen, Pernille Thordal
Jørgensen, Susanne Fogh
Tranberg, Mette
Njor, Sisse Helle
Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title_full Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title_fullStr Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title_short Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
title_sort screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72279-x
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenpernillethordal screeningparticipationafterafalsepositiveresultinorganizedcervicalcancerscreeninganationwideregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT jørgensensusannefogh screeningparticipationafterafalsepositiveresultinorganizedcervicalcancerscreeninganationwideregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT tranbergmette screeningparticipationafterafalsepositiveresultinorganizedcervicalcancerscreeninganationwideregisterbasedcohortstudy
AT njorsissehelle screeningparticipationafterafalsepositiveresultinorganizedcervicalcancerscreeninganationwideregisterbasedcohortstudy