Cargando…

Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?

Many chronic diseases impair patients’ quality of life and may also affect their control perceptions. This could particularly happen for patients with epilepsy whose seizures often imply loss of control as a deeply disturbing experience. In 1980, a study on learned helplessness in epilepsy found a h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolf, Peter, Lin, Katia, Mameniškiené, Rüta, Walz, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7509065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02251
_version_ 1783585525756592128
author Wolf, Peter
Lin, Katia
Mameniškiené, Rüta
Walz, Roger
author_facet Wolf, Peter
Lin, Katia
Mameniškiené, Rüta
Walz, Roger
author_sort Wolf, Peter
collection PubMed
description Many chronic diseases impair patients’ quality of life and may also affect their control perceptions. This could particularly happen for patients with epilepsy whose seizures often imply loss of control as a deeply disturbing experience. In 1980, a study on learned helplessness in epilepsy found a highly significant reduction of internal general locus of control (GLOC) and an increase of chance and powerful others health-related LOC (HLOC). In consequence, LOC became a frequent target of investigations relating to depression and anxiety, quality of life, coping, compliance, and other psychosocial aspects of epilepsy. Both GLOC and HLOC were investigated, and special groups like children, elderly, mentally handicapped persons, and those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures were addressed. Most studies attempted to relate in-group differences of LOC to other parameters. Seizure-free patients were found to have a more internal HLOC, and patients with severe epilepsies have a more external HLOC. Patients with a high external HLOC seem to have more difficulties with coping and to be more anxious. Whereas external GLOC was correlated with learned helplessness, internal GLOC was associated with high self-efficacy and better life quality. An association of external LOC with depression seemed not to be a stable co-relation as clinical improvement following epilepsy surgery dissociated the two. A hypothesis was confirmed that the ability of some patients to counteract seizures at their onset, thus preserving control, was correlated with a higher internal HLOC. Some other theoretically well-founded hypotheses were not supported. Absolute figures as reported in several papers are of limited use because the only normative data for comparison come from a local sample of 1976 from Tennessee, whereas LOC scores may differ largely dependent on cultural and societal conditions. Very few controlled studies exist, and the early finding of a generally externalized LOC in epilepsy was confirmed only in one study performed in a South Indian community known for strong stigma against epilepsy. A recent transcultural investigation conducted in Brazil and Lithuania found no differences from healthy controls and between countries. It seems worthwhile to further investigate relations of LOC with epilepsy stigma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7509065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75090652020-10-02 Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control? Wolf, Peter Lin, Katia Mameniškiené, Rüta Walz, Roger Front Psychol Psychology Many chronic diseases impair patients’ quality of life and may also affect their control perceptions. This could particularly happen for patients with epilepsy whose seizures often imply loss of control as a deeply disturbing experience. In 1980, a study on learned helplessness in epilepsy found a highly significant reduction of internal general locus of control (GLOC) and an increase of chance and powerful others health-related LOC (HLOC). In consequence, LOC became a frequent target of investigations relating to depression and anxiety, quality of life, coping, compliance, and other psychosocial aspects of epilepsy. Both GLOC and HLOC were investigated, and special groups like children, elderly, mentally handicapped persons, and those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures were addressed. Most studies attempted to relate in-group differences of LOC to other parameters. Seizure-free patients were found to have a more internal HLOC, and patients with severe epilepsies have a more external HLOC. Patients with a high external HLOC seem to have more difficulties with coping and to be more anxious. Whereas external GLOC was correlated with learned helplessness, internal GLOC was associated with high self-efficacy and better life quality. An association of external LOC with depression seemed not to be a stable co-relation as clinical improvement following epilepsy surgery dissociated the two. A hypothesis was confirmed that the ability of some patients to counteract seizures at their onset, thus preserving control, was correlated with a higher internal HLOC. Some other theoretically well-founded hypotheses were not supported. Absolute figures as reported in several papers are of limited use because the only normative data for comparison come from a local sample of 1976 from Tennessee, whereas LOC scores may differ largely dependent on cultural and societal conditions. Very few controlled studies exist, and the early finding of a generally externalized LOC in epilepsy was confirmed only in one study performed in a South Indian community known for strong stigma against epilepsy. A recent transcultural investigation conducted in Brazil and Lithuania found no differences from healthy controls and between countries. It seems worthwhile to further investigate relations of LOC with epilepsy stigma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7509065/ /pubmed/33013587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02251 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wolf, Lin, Mameniškiené and Walz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wolf, Peter
Lin, Katia
Mameniškiené, Rüta
Walz, Roger
Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title_full Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title_fullStr Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title_full_unstemmed Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title_short Does Epilepsy Have an Impact on Locus of Control?
title_sort does epilepsy have an impact on locus of control?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7509065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02251
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfpeter doesepilepsyhaveanimpactonlocusofcontrol
AT linkatia doesepilepsyhaveanimpactonlocusofcontrol
AT mameniskieneruta doesepilepsyhaveanimpactonlocusofcontrol
AT walzroger doesepilepsyhaveanimpactonlocusofcontrol