Cargando…
Getting the Right Evidence After Drug Approval
To generate comparative evidence in a timely fashion for drugs without restricting or delaying access, value-based pricing and reimbursement could be conditioned on a prospective, post-approval evidence generation plan.
Autores principales: | Vreman, Rick A., Leufkens, Hubert G. M., Kesselheim, Aaron S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7509198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.569535 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
por: Vreman, Rick A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Role of Regulator-Imposed Post-Approval Studies in Health Technology Assessments for Conditionally Approved Drugs
por: Vreman, Rick A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Comparing Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Reviews of Medicines in the United States and Europe
por: Vreman, Rick A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Agnostic Approvals in Oncology: Getting the Right Drug to the Right Patient with the Right Genomics
por: Tateo, Valentina, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Pre‐approval and post‐approval availability of evidence and clinical benefit of conditionally approved cancer drugs in Europe: A comparison with standard approved cancer drugs
por: Bloem, Lourens T., et al.
Publicado: (2022)