Cargando…
The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces
There is an increased effort on developing novel and active surfaces in order to accelerate their osteointegration, such as nanosized crystalline hydroxyapatite coating (HAnano®). To better understand the biological behavior of osteoblasts grown on HAnano® surface, the set of data was compared with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7509554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3026893 |
_version_ | 1783585621982314496 |
---|---|
author | da Silva, Rodrigo A. da Silva Feltran, Geórgia Ferreira, Marcel Rodrigues Wood, Patrícia Fretes Bezerra, Fabio Zambuzzi, Willian F. |
author_facet | da Silva, Rodrigo A. da Silva Feltran, Geórgia Ferreira, Marcel Rodrigues Wood, Patrícia Fretes Bezerra, Fabio Zambuzzi, Willian F. |
author_sort | da Silva, Rodrigo A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an increased effort on developing novel and active surfaces in order to accelerate their osteointegration, such as nanosized crystalline hydroxyapatite coating (HAnano®). To better understand the biological behavior of osteoblasts grown on HAnano® surface, the set of data was compared with SLActive®, a hydrophilic sandblasted titanium surface. Methodologically, osteoblasts were seeded on both surfaces up to 72 hours, to allow evaluating cell adhesion, viability, and set of genes encoding proteins related with adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Our data shows HAnano® displays an interesting substrate to support cell adhesion with typical spread morphologic cells, while SLActive®-adhering cells presented fusiform morphology. Our data shows that the cellular adhesion mechanism was accompanied with upexpression of integrin β1, Fak, and Src, favoring the assembling of focal adhesion platforms and coupling cell cycle progression (upmodulating of Cdk2, Cdk4, and Cdk6 genes) in response to HAnano®. Additionally, both bioactive surfaces promoted osteoblast differentiation stimulus, by activating Runx2, Osterix, and Alp genes. Although both surfaces promoted Rankl gene expression, Opg gene expression was higher in SLActive® and this difference reflected on the Rankl/Opg ratio. Finally, Caspase1 gene was significantly upmodulated in response to HAnano® and it suggests an involvement of the inflammasome complex. Collectively, this study provides enough evidences to support that the nanohydroxyapatite-coated surface provides the necessary microenvironment to drive osteoblast performance on dental implants and these stages of osteogenesis are expected during the early stages of osseointegration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7509554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75095542020-09-30 The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces da Silva, Rodrigo A. da Silva Feltran, Geórgia Ferreira, Marcel Rodrigues Wood, Patrícia Fretes Bezerra, Fabio Zambuzzi, Willian F. Biomed Res Int Research Article There is an increased effort on developing novel and active surfaces in order to accelerate their osteointegration, such as nanosized crystalline hydroxyapatite coating (HAnano®). To better understand the biological behavior of osteoblasts grown on HAnano® surface, the set of data was compared with SLActive®, a hydrophilic sandblasted titanium surface. Methodologically, osteoblasts were seeded on both surfaces up to 72 hours, to allow evaluating cell adhesion, viability, and set of genes encoding proteins related with adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Our data shows HAnano® displays an interesting substrate to support cell adhesion with typical spread morphologic cells, while SLActive®-adhering cells presented fusiform morphology. Our data shows that the cellular adhesion mechanism was accompanied with upexpression of integrin β1, Fak, and Src, favoring the assembling of focal adhesion platforms and coupling cell cycle progression (upmodulating of Cdk2, Cdk4, and Cdk6 genes) in response to HAnano®. Additionally, both bioactive surfaces promoted osteoblast differentiation stimulus, by activating Runx2, Osterix, and Alp genes. Although both surfaces promoted Rankl gene expression, Opg gene expression was higher in SLActive® and this difference reflected on the Rankl/Opg ratio. Finally, Caspase1 gene was significantly upmodulated in response to HAnano® and it suggests an involvement of the inflammasome complex. Collectively, this study provides enough evidences to support that the nanohydroxyapatite-coated surface provides the necessary microenvironment to drive osteoblast performance on dental implants and these stages of osteogenesis are expected during the early stages of osseointegration. Hindawi 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7509554/ /pubmed/33005686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3026893 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rodrigo A. da Silva et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article da Silva, Rodrigo A. da Silva Feltran, Geórgia Ferreira, Marcel Rodrigues Wood, Patrícia Fretes Bezerra, Fabio Zambuzzi, Willian F. The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title | The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title_full | The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title_short | The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces |
title_sort | impact of bioactive surfaces in the early stages of osseointegration: an in vitro comparative study evaluating the hanano® and slactive® super hydrophilic surfaces |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7509554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3026893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasilvarodrigoa theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT dasilvafeltrangeorgia theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT ferreiramarcelrodrigues theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT woodpatriciafretes theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT bezerrafabio theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT zambuzziwillianf theimpactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT dasilvarodrigoa impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT dasilvafeltrangeorgia impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT ferreiramarcelrodrigues impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT woodpatriciafretes impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT bezerrafabio impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces AT zambuzziwillianf impactofbioactivesurfacesintheearlystagesofosseointegrationaninvitrocomparativestudyevaluatingthehananoandslactivesuperhydrophilicsurfaces |