Cargando…
The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease
Previous research has shown that a MALDI-MS technique can be used to screen for sickle cell disease (SCD), and that a system combining automated sample preparation, MALDI-MS analysis and classification software is a relevant approach for first-line, high-throughput SCD screening. In order to achieve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5030031 |
_version_ | 1783585738343841792 |
---|---|
author | El Osta, Marven Naubourg, Pierre Grunewald, Olivier Renom, Gilles Ducoroy, Patrick Périni, Jean Marc |
author_facet | El Osta, Marven Naubourg, Pierre Grunewald, Olivier Renom, Gilles Ducoroy, Patrick Périni, Jean Marc |
author_sort | El Osta, Marven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has shown that a MALDI-MS technique can be used to screen for sickle cell disease (SCD), and that a system combining automated sample preparation, MALDI-MS analysis and classification software is a relevant approach for first-line, high-throughput SCD screening. In order to achieve a high-throughput “plug and play” approach while detecting “non-standard” profiles that might prompt the misclassification of a sample, we have incorporated various sets of alerts into the decision support software. These included “biological alert” indicators of a newborn’s clinical status (e. g., detecting samples with no or low HbA), and “technical alerts” indicators for the most common non-standard profiles, i.e., those which might otherwise lead to sample misclassification. We evaluated these alerts by applying them to two datasets (produced by different laboratories). Despite the random generation of abnormal spectra by one-off technical faults or due to the nature and quality of the samples, the use of alerts fully secured the process of automatic sample classification. Firstly, cases of β-thalassemia were detected. Secondly, after a visual check on the tagged profiles and reanalysis of the corresponding biological samples, all the samples were correctly reclassified without prompting further alerts. All of the samples for which the results were not tagged were well classified (i.e., sensitivity and specificity = 1). The alerts were mainly designed for detecting false-negative classifications; all the FAS samples misclassified by the software as FA (a false negative) were marked with an alert. The implementation of alerts in the NeoScreening(®) Laboratory Information Management System’s decision support software opens up perspectives for the safe, reliable, automated classification of samples, with a visual check solely on abnormal results or samples. It should now be possible to evaluate the combination of the NeoSickle(®) analytical solution and the NeoScreening(®) Laboratory Information Management System in a real-life, prospective study of first-line SCD screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7510198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75101982020-10-15 The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease El Osta, Marven Naubourg, Pierre Grunewald, Olivier Renom, Gilles Ducoroy, Patrick Périni, Jean Marc Int J Neonatal Screen Article Previous research has shown that a MALDI-MS technique can be used to screen for sickle cell disease (SCD), and that a system combining automated sample preparation, MALDI-MS analysis and classification software is a relevant approach for first-line, high-throughput SCD screening. In order to achieve a high-throughput “plug and play” approach while detecting “non-standard” profiles that might prompt the misclassification of a sample, we have incorporated various sets of alerts into the decision support software. These included “biological alert” indicators of a newborn’s clinical status (e. g., detecting samples with no or low HbA), and “technical alerts” indicators for the most common non-standard profiles, i.e., those which might otherwise lead to sample misclassification. We evaluated these alerts by applying them to two datasets (produced by different laboratories). Despite the random generation of abnormal spectra by one-off technical faults or due to the nature and quality of the samples, the use of alerts fully secured the process of automatic sample classification. Firstly, cases of β-thalassemia were detected. Secondly, after a visual check on the tagged profiles and reanalysis of the corresponding biological samples, all the samples were correctly reclassified without prompting further alerts. All of the samples for which the results were not tagged were well classified (i.e., sensitivity and specificity = 1). The alerts were mainly designed for detecting false-negative classifications; all the FAS samples misclassified by the software as FA (a false negative) were marked with an alert. The implementation of alerts in the NeoScreening(®) Laboratory Information Management System’s decision support software opens up perspectives for the safe, reliable, automated classification of samples, with a visual check solely on abnormal results or samples. It should now be possible to evaluate the combination of the NeoSickle(®) analytical solution and the NeoScreening(®) Laboratory Information Management System in a real-life, prospective study of first-line SCD screening. MDPI 2019-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7510198/ /pubmed/33072990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5030031 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El Osta, Marven Naubourg, Pierre Grunewald, Olivier Renom, Gilles Ducoroy, Patrick Périni, Jean Marc The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title | The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title_full | The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title_fullStr | The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title_short | The Reliable, Automatic Classification of Neonates in First-Tier MALDI-MS Screening for Sickle Cell Disease |
title_sort | reliable, automatic classification of neonates in first-tier maldi-ms screening for sickle cell disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5030031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elostamarven thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT naubourgpierre thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT grunewaldolivier thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT renomgilles thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT ducoroypatrick thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT perinijeanmarc thereliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT elostamarven reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT naubourgpierre reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT grunewaldolivier reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT renomgilles reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT ducoroypatrick reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease AT perinijeanmarc reliableautomaticclassificationofneonatesinfirsttiermaldimsscreeningforsicklecelldisease |