Cargando…

Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure

BACKGROUND: Aircrew members are required to attend hypoxia awareness training regularly to strengthen their memory of their personal hypoxia symptoms by undergoing training inside a hypobaric chamber. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hypoxia symptoms experienced during tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tu, Min-Yu, Chiang, Kwo-Tsao, Cheng, Chao-Chien, Li, Fang-Ling, Wen, Yu-His, Lin, Sing-Hong, Lai, Chung-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32966320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239194
_version_ 1783585884689399808
author Tu, Min-Yu
Chiang, Kwo-Tsao
Cheng, Chao-Chien
Li, Fang-Ling
Wen, Yu-His
Lin, Sing-Hong
Lai, Chung-Yu
author_facet Tu, Min-Yu
Chiang, Kwo-Tsao
Cheng, Chao-Chien
Li, Fang-Ling
Wen, Yu-His
Lin, Sing-Hong
Lai, Chung-Yu
author_sort Tu, Min-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aircrew members are required to attend hypoxia awareness training regularly to strengthen their memory of their personal hypoxia symptoms by undergoing training inside a hypobaric chamber. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hypoxia symptoms experienced during two training sessions that were 4 years apart. METHODS: This was a crossover study to compare hypoxia symptoms and self-reported physiological effects of trapped gas between a previous training session and a current training session in an altitude chamber. The subjects were military crew members who undertook a 25,000-feet refresher training course in 2018. We used a structured questionnaire to obtain the target information before and during hypoxia exposure. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 341 trainees participated in this survey and completely filled out the questionnaire. Gastrointestinal tract discomfort caused by the expansion of trapped gas was the main physiological reaction during the previous and current training sessions. Frequently reported symptoms were poor concentration (30.5%), impaired cognitive function (20.5%), visual disturbances (16.4%), hot flashes (15.8%), and paresthesia (12.6%) during both exposures. However, the proportions of participants reporting poor concentration (P = 0.378) and visual disturbances (P = 0.594) were not significantly different between the recalled and current training sessions. The five most common symptoms among the subjects with less than 1,000 flight hours were poor concentration (29.8%), visual disturbance (27.3%), impaired cognitive function (14.9%), dizziness/lightheadedness (11.6%), and hot flashes (9.9%), which overlapped substantially with the symptoms reported by other subjects. The occurrence of those five most common symptoms in the group with more than 1,000 flight hours did not significantly differ between the recalled training session and the current training session. CONCLUSIONS: The most common hypoxia symptoms reported were similar between the recalled and current training sessions in an environment with a low oxygen concentration. This finding was also clearly affected by the duration of flight experience. Moreover, GI effects of the expansion of trapped gas were commonly observed at low atmospheric pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7510968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75109682020-10-01 Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure Tu, Min-Yu Chiang, Kwo-Tsao Cheng, Chao-Chien Li, Fang-Ling Wen, Yu-His Lin, Sing-Hong Lai, Chung-Yu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Aircrew members are required to attend hypoxia awareness training regularly to strengthen their memory of their personal hypoxia symptoms by undergoing training inside a hypobaric chamber. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hypoxia symptoms experienced during two training sessions that were 4 years apart. METHODS: This was a crossover study to compare hypoxia symptoms and self-reported physiological effects of trapped gas between a previous training session and a current training session in an altitude chamber. The subjects were military crew members who undertook a 25,000-feet refresher training course in 2018. We used a structured questionnaire to obtain the target information before and during hypoxia exposure. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 341 trainees participated in this survey and completely filled out the questionnaire. Gastrointestinal tract discomfort caused by the expansion of trapped gas was the main physiological reaction during the previous and current training sessions. Frequently reported symptoms were poor concentration (30.5%), impaired cognitive function (20.5%), visual disturbances (16.4%), hot flashes (15.8%), and paresthesia (12.6%) during both exposures. However, the proportions of participants reporting poor concentration (P = 0.378) and visual disturbances (P = 0.594) were not significantly different between the recalled and current training sessions. The five most common symptoms among the subjects with less than 1,000 flight hours were poor concentration (29.8%), visual disturbance (27.3%), impaired cognitive function (14.9%), dizziness/lightheadedness (11.6%), and hot flashes (9.9%), which overlapped substantially with the symptoms reported by other subjects. The occurrence of those five most common symptoms in the group with more than 1,000 flight hours did not significantly differ between the recalled training session and the current training session. CONCLUSIONS: The most common hypoxia symptoms reported were similar between the recalled and current training sessions in an environment with a low oxygen concentration. This finding was also clearly affected by the duration of flight experience. Moreover, GI effects of the expansion of trapped gas were commonly observed at low atmospheric pressure. Public Library of Science 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7510968/ /pubmed/32966320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239194 Text en © 2020 Tu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tu, Min-Yu
Chiang, Kwo-Tsao
Cheng, Chao-Chien
Li, Fang-Ling
Wen, Yu-His
Lin, Sing-Hong
Lai, Chung-Yu
Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title_full Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title_fullStr Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title_short Comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
title_sort comparison of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms between a recalled exposure and a current exposure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32966320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239194
work_keys_str_mv AT tuminyu comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT chiangkwotsao comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT chengchaochien comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT lifangling comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT wenyuhis comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT linsinghong comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure
AT laichungyu comparisonofhypobarichypoxiasymptomsbetweenarecalledexposureandacurrentexposure