Cargando…

Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design

To compare the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a multifocal IOL (ZMB00) of the same material and basic design, we evaluated postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZCB00 or ZMB00 implantation from D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanabe, Hirotaka, Tabuchi, Hitoshi, Shojo, Tomohiro, Yamauchi, Tomofusa, Takase, Kosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x
_version_ 1783585941658533888
author Tanabe, Hirotaka
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Shojo, Tomohiro
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Takase, Kosuke
author_facet Tanabe, Hirotaka
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Shojo, Tomohiro
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Takase, Kosuke
author_sort Tanabe, Hirotaka
collection PubMed
description To compare the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a multifocal IOL (ZMB00) of the same material and basic design, we evaluated postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZCB00 or ZMB00 implantation from December 13, 2010, to July 29, 2019, with the right and left lenses implanted within 3 months of each other. The study enrolled 2,230 eyes of 1,115 patients. The monofocal group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the multifocal group comprised 1,326 eyes of 663 patients (67.0 ± 7.8 years; females/males, 518/145). Contrast sensitivity (4.0/2.5/1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), contrast sensitivity with glare (1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), and the VFQ-25 score for driving at night were significantly better in the monofocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). Uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence were significantly better in the multifocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). The two IOL groups had different characteristics in terms of contrast sensitivity, night-time driving, uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7511318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75113182020-09-24 Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design Tanabe, Hirotaka Tabuchi, Hitoshi Shojo, Tomohiro Yamauchi, Tomofusa Takase, Kosuke Sci Rep Article To compare the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a multifocal IOL (ZMB00) of the same material and basic design, we evaluated postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZCB00 or ZMB00 implantation from December 13, 2010, to July 29, 2019, with the right and left lenses implanted within 3 months of each other. The study enrolled 2,230 eyes of 1,115 patients. The monofocal group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the multifocal group comprised 1,326 eyes of 663 patients (67.0 ± 7.8 years; females/males, 518/145). Contrast sensitivity (4.0/2.5/1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), contrast sensitivity with glare (1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), and the VFQ-25 score for driving at night were significantly better in the monofocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). Uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence were significantly better in the multifocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). The two IOL groups had different characteristics in terms of contrast sensitivity, night-time driving, uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7511318/ /pubmed/32968124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tanabe, Hirotaka
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Shojo, Tomohiro
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Takase, Kosuke
Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title_full Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title_fullStr Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title_short Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
title_sort comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tanabehirotaka comparisonofvisualperformancebetweenmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesofthesamematerialandbasicdesign
AT tabuchihitoshi comparisonofvisualperformancebetweenmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesofthesamematerialandbasicdesign
AT shojotomohiro comparisonofvisualperformancebetweenmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesofthesamematerialandbasicdesign
AT yamauchitomofusa comparisonofvisualperformancebetweenmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesofthesamematerialandbasicdesign
AT takasekosuke comparisonofvisualperformancebetweenmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesofthesamematerialandbasicdesign