Cargando…

Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study

BACKGROUND: The isolation of symptomatic cases and tracing of contacts has been used as an early COVID-19 containment measure in many countries, with additional physical distancing measures also introduced as outbreaks have grown. To maintain control of infection while also reducing disruption to po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kucharski, Adam J, Klepac, Petra, Conlan, Andrew J K, Kissler, Stephen M, Tang, Maria L, Fry, Hannah, Gog, Julia R, Edmunds, W John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6
_version_ 1783585971197968384
author Kucharski, Adam J
Klepac, Petra
Conlan, Andrew J K
Kissler, Stephen M
Tang, Maria L
Fry, Hannah
Gog, Julia R
Edmunds, W John
author_facet Kucharski, Adam J
Klepac, Petra
Conlan, Andrew J K
Kissler, Stephen M
Tang, Maria L
Fry, Hannah
Gog, Julia R
Edmunds, W John
author_sort Kucharski, Adam J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The isolation of symptomatic cases and tracing of contacts has been used as an early COVID-19 containment measure in many countries, with additional physical distancing measures also introduced as outbreaks have grown. To maintain control of infection while also reducing disruption to populations, there is a need to understand what combination of measures—including novel digital tracing approaches and less intensive physical distancing—might be required to reduce transmission. We aimed to estimate the reduction in transmission under different control measures across settings and how many contacts would be quarantined per day in different strategies for a given level of symptomatic case incidence. METHODS: For this mathematical modelling study, we used a model of individual-level transmission stratified by setting (household, work, school, or other) based on BBC Pandemic data from 40 162 UK participants. We simulated the effect of a range of different testing, isolation, tracing, and physical distancing scenarios. Under optimistic but plausible assumptions, we estimated reduction in the effective reproduction number and the number of contacts that would be newly quarantined each day under different strategies. RESULTS: We estimated that combined isolation and tracing strategies would reduce transmission more than mass testing or self-isolation alone: mean transmission reduction of 2% for mass random testing of 5% of the population each week, 29% for self-isolation alone of symptomatic cases within the household, 35% for self-isolation alone outside the household, 37% for self-isolation plus household quarantine, 64% for self-isolation and household quarantine with the addition of manual contact tracing of all contacts, 57% with the addition of manual tracing of acquaintances only, and 47% with the addition of app-based tracing only. If limits were placed on gatherings outside of home, school, or work, then manual contact tracing of acquaintances alone could have an effect on transmission reduction similar to that of detailed contact tracing. In a scenario where 1000 new symptomatic cases that met the definition to trigger contact tracing occurred per day, we estimated that, in most contact tracing strategies, 15 000–41 000 contacts would be newly quarantined each day. INTERPRETATION: Consistent with previous modelling studies and country-specific COVID-19 responses to date, our analysis estimated that a high proportion of cases would need to self-isolate and a high proportion of their contacts to be successfully traced to ensure an effective reproduction number lower than 1 in the absence of other measures. If combined with moderate physical distancing measures, self-isolation and contact tracing would be more likely to achieve control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Commission, Royal Society, Medical Research Council.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7511527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75115272020-10-01 Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study Kucharski, Adam J Klepac, Petra Conlan, Andrew J K Kissler, Stephen M Tang, Maria L Fry, Hannah Gog, Julia R Edmunds, W John Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: The isolation of symptomatic cases and tracing of contacts has been used as an early COVID-19 containment measure in many countries, with additional physical distancing measures also introduced as outbreaks have grown. To maintain control of infection while also reducing disruption to populations, there is a need to understand what combination of measures—including novel digital tracing approaches and less intensive physical distancing—might be required to reduce transmission. We aimed to estimate the reduction in transmission under different control measures across settings and how many contacts would be quarantined per day in different strategies for a given level of symptomatic case incidence. METHODS: For this mathematical modelling study, we used a model of individual-level transmission stratified by setting (household, work, school, or other) based on BBC Pandemic data from 40 162 UK participants. We simulated the effect of a range of different testing, isolation, tracing, and physical distancing scenarios. Under optimistic but plausible assumptions, we estimated reduction in the effective reproduction number and the number of contacts that would be newly quarantined each day under different strategies. RESULTS: We estimated that combined isolation and tracing strategies would reduce transmission more than mass testing or self-isolation alone: mean transmission reduction of 2% for mass random testing of 5% of the population each week, 29% for self-isolation alone of symptomatic cases within the household, 35% for self-isolation alone outside the household, 37% for self-isolation plus household quarantine, 64% for self-isolation and household quarantine with the addition of manual contact tracing of all contacts, 57% with the addition of manual tracing of acquaintances only, and 47% with the addition of app-based tracing only. If limits were placed on gatherings outside of home, school, or work, then manual contact tracing of acquaintances alone could have an effect on transmission reduction similar to that of detailed contact tracing. In a scenario where 1000 new symptomatic cases that met the definition to trigger contact tracing occurred per day, we estimated that, in most contact tracing strategies, 15 000–41 000 contacts would be newly quarantined each day. INTERPRETATION: Consistent with previous modelling studies and country-specific COVID-19 responses to date, our analysis estimated that a high proportion of cases would need to self-isolate and a high proportion of their contacts to be successfully traced to ensure an effective reproduction number lower than 1 in the absence of other measures. If combined with moderate physical distancing measures, self-isolation and contact tracing would be more likely to achieve control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Commission, Royal Society, Medical Research Council. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7511527/ /pubmed/32559451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Articles
Kucharski, Adam J
Klepac, Petra
Conlan, Andrew J K
Kissler, Stephen M
Tang, Maria L
Fry, Hannah
Gog, Julia R
Edmunds, W John
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title_full Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title_short Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
title_sort effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of sars-cov-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kucharskiadamj effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT klepacpetra effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT conlanandrewjk effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT kisslerstephenm effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT tangmarial effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT fryhannah effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT gogjuliar effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT edmundswjohn effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy
AT effectivenessofisolationtestingcontacttracingandphysicaldistancingonreducingtransmissionofsarscov2indifferentsettingsamathematicalmodellingstudy