Cargando…
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomoti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365 |
_version_ | 1783585978377568256 |
---|---|
author | Nunobe, Souya Ida, Satoshi |
author_facet | Nunobe, Souya Ida, Satoshi |
author_sort | Nunobe, Souya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7511558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75115582020-09-30 Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review Nunobe, Souya Ida, Satoshi Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7511558/ /pubmed/33005844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Nunobe, Souya Ida, Satoshi Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title | Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_full | Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_fullStr | Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_short | Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_sort | current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nunobesouya currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview AT idasatoshi currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview |