Cargando…
Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871 |
_version_ | 1783585989387616256 |
---|---|
author | Trogrlic, Zoran van der Jagt, Mathieu van Achterberg, Theo Ponssen, Huibert Schoonderbeek, Jeannette Schreiner, Frodo Verbrugge, Serge Dijkstra, Annemieke Bakker, Jan Ista, Erwin |
author_facet | Trogrlic, Zoran van der Jagt, Mathieu van Achterberg, Theo Ponssen, Huibert Schoonderbeek, Jeannette Schreiner, Frodo Verbrugge, Serge Dijkstra, Annemieke Bakker, Jan Ista, Erwin |
author_sort | Trogrlic, Zoran |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluation of a prospective multicentre implementation study. SETTING: Six ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: 4449 adult ICU patients and 500 ICU professionals approximately. INTERVENTION: A tailored implementation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to delirium guidelines recommendations at ICU level before, during and after implementation; knowledge and perceived barriers; and experiences with the implementation. RESULTS: Five of six ICUs were exposed to all implementation strategies as planned. More than 85% followed the required e-learnings; 92% of the nurses attended the clinical classroom lessons; five ICUs used all available implementation strategies and perceived to have implemented all guideline recommendations (>90%). Adherence to predefined performance indicators (PIs) at ICU level was only above the preset target (>85%) for delirium screening. For all other PIs, the inter-ICU variability was between 34% and 72%. The implementation of delirium guidelines was feasible and successful in resolving the majority of barriers found before the implementation. The improvement was well sustained 6 months after full guideline implementation. Knowledge about delirium was improved (from 61% to 65%). The implementation programme was experienced as very successful. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted implementation can improve and sustain adherence to delirium guidelines, is feasible and can largely be performed as planned. However, variability in delirium guideline adherence at individual ICUs remains a challenge, indicating the need for more tailoring at centre level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7511605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75116052020-10-05 Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation Trogrlic, Zoran van der Jagt, Mathieu van Achterberg, Theo Ponssen, Huibert Schoonderbeek, Jeannette Schreiner, Frodo Verbrugge, Serge Dijkstra, Annemieke Bakker, Jan Ista, Erwin BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluation of a prospective multicentre implementation study. SETTING: Six ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: 4449 adult ICU patients and 500 ICU professionals approximately. INTERVENTION: A tailored implementation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to delirium guidelines recommendations at ICU level before, during and after implementation; knowledge and perceived barriers; and experiences with the implementation. RESULTS: Five of six ICUs were exposed to all implementation strategies as planned. More than 85% followed the required e-learnings; 92% of the nurses attended the clinical classroom lessons; five ICUs used all available implementation strategies and perceived to have implemented all guideline recommendations (>90%). Adherence to predefined performance indicators (PIs) at ICU level was only above the preset target (>85%) for delirium screening. For all other PIs, the inter-ICU variability was between 34% and 72%. The implementation of delirium guidelines was feasible and successful in resolving the majority of barriers found before the implementation. The improvement was well sustained 6 months after full guideline implementation. Knowledge about delirium was improved (from 61% to 65%). The implementation programme was experienced as very successful. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted implementation can improve and sustain adherence to delirium guidelines, is feasible and can largely be performed as planned. However, variability in delirium guideline adherence at individual ICUs remains a challenge, indicating the need for more tailoring at centre level. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7511605/ /pubmed/32948600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Trogrlic, Zoran van der Jagt, Mathieu van Achterberg, Theo Ponssen, Huibert Schoonderbeek, Jeannette Schreiner, Frodo Verbrugge, Serge Dijkstra, Annemieke Bakker, Jan Ista, Erwin Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title | Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title_full | Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title_fullStr | Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title_short | Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
title_sort | prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of icu delirium guidelines: a process evaluation |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trogrliczoran prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT vanderjagtmathieu prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT vanachterbergtheo prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT ponssenhuibert prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT schoonderbeekjeannette prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT schreinerfrodo prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT verbruggeserge prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT dijkstraannemieke prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT bakkerjan prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation AT istaerwin prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation |