Cargando…

Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trogrlic, Zoran, van der Jagt, Mathieu, van Achterberg, Theo, Ponssen, Huibert, Schoonderbeek, Jeannette, Schreiner, Frodo, Verbrugge, Serge, Dijkstra, Annemieke, Bakker, Jan, Ista, Erwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871
_version_ 1783585989387616256
author Trogrlic, Zoran
van der Jagt, Mathieu
van Achterberg, Theo
Ponssen, Huibert
Schoonderbeek, Jeannette
Schreiner, Frodo
Verbrugge, Serge
Dijkstra, Annemieke
Bakker, Jan
Ista, Erwin
author_facet Trogrlic, Zoran
van der Jagt, Mathieu
van Achterberg, Theo
Ponssen, Huibert
Schoonderbeek, Jeannette
Schreiner, Frodo
Verbrugge, Serge
Dijkstra, Annemieke
Bakker, Jan
Ista, Erwin
author_sort Trogrlic, Zoran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluation of a prospective multicentre implementation study. SETTING: Six ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: 4449 adult ICU patients and 500 ICU professionals approximately. INTERVENTION: A tailored implementation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to delirium guidelines recommendations at ICU level before, during and after implementation; knowledge and perceived barriers; and experiences with the implementation. RESULTS: Five of six ICUs were exposed to all implementation strategies as planned. More than 85% followed the required e-learnings; 92% of the nurses attended the clinical classroom lessons; five ICUs used all available implementation strategies and perceived to have implemented all guideline recommendations (>90%). Adherence to predefined performance indicators (PIs) at ICU level was only above the preset target (>85%) for delirium screening. For all other PIs, the inter-ICU variability was between 34% and 72%. The implementation of delirium guidelines was feasible and successful in resolving the majority of barriers found before the implementation. The improvement was well sustained 6 months after full guideline implementation. Knowledge about delirium was improved (from 61% to 65%). The implementation programme was experienced as very successful. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted implementation can improve and sustain adherence to delirium guidelines, is feasible and can largely be performed as planned. However, variability in delirium guideline adherence at individual ICUs remains a challenge, indicating the need for more tailoring at centre level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7511605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75116052020-10-05 Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation Trogrlic, Zoran van der Jagt, Mathieu van Achterberg, Theo Ponssen, Huibert Schoonderbeek, Jeannette Schreiner, Frodo Verbrugge, Serge Dijkstra, Annemieke Bakker, Jan Ista, Erwin BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore: the exposure of healthcare workers to a delirium guidelines implementation programme; effects on guideline adherence at intensive care unit (ICU) level; impact on knowledge and barriers, and experiences with the implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods process evaluation of a prospective multicentre implementation study. SETTING: Six ICUs. PARTICIPANTS: 4449 adult ICU patients and 500 ICU professionals approximately. INTERVENTION: A tailored implementation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to delirium guidelines recommendations at ICU level before, during and after implementation; knowledge and perceived barriers; and experiences with the implementation. RESULTS: Five of six ICUs were exposed to all implementation strategies as planned. More than 85% followed the required e-learnings; 92% of the nurses attended the clinical classroom lessons; five ICUs used all available implementation strategies and perceived to have implemented all guideline recommendations (>90%). Adherence to predefined performance indicators (PIs) at ICU level was only above the preset target (>85%) for delirium screening. For all other PIs, the inter-ICU variability was between 34% and 72%. The implementation of delirium guidelines was feasible and successful in resolving the majority of barriers found before the implementation. The improvement was well sustained 6 months after full guideline implementation. Knowledge about delirium was improved (from 61% to 65%). The implementation programme was experienced as very successful. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted implementation can improve and sustain adherence to delirium guidelines, is feasible and can largely be performed as planned. However, variability in delirium guideline adherence at individual ICUs remains a challenge, indicating the need for more tailoring at centre level. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7511605/ /pubmed/32948600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Trogrlic, Zoran
van der Jagt, Mathieu
van Achterberg, Theo
Ponssen, Huibert
Schoonderbeek, Jeannette
Schreiner, Frodo
Verbrugge, Serge
Dijkstra, Annemieke
Bakker, Jan
Ista, Erwin
Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title_full Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title_fullStr Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title_short Prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of ICU delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
title_sort prospective multicentre multifaceted before-after implementation study of icu delirium guidelines: a process evaluation
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000871
work_keys_str_mv AT trogrliczoran prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT vanderjagtmathieu prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT vanachterbergtheo prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT ponssenhuibert prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT schoonderbeekjeannette prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT schreinerfrodo prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT verbruggeserge prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT dijkstraannemieke prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT bakkerjan prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation
AT istaerwin prospectivemulticentremultifacetedbeforeafterimplementationstudyoficudeliriumguidelinesaprocessevaluation