Cargando…
Effect of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on cardiovascular events in populations with different body mass indexes: a prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to explore the effects of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) on cardiovascular events (CVEs) in people with various body mass indexes (BMIs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The average real variability of systolic blood pressure (ARV(SBP))...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035836 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to explore the effects of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) on cardiovascular events (CVEs) in people with various body mass indexes (BMIs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The average real variability of systolic blood pressure (ARV(SBP)) was the indicator for visit-to-visit BPV. The participants were divided into three groups: normal weight, overweight and obesity. We further divided these groups into four subgroups based on the ARV(SBP). A Cox regression model was used to calculate the HRs of the ARV(SBP) on CVEs in the same and different BMI groups. Additionally, a competitive risk model was used to calculate the HRs of the ARV(SBP) on CVEs in the same BMI group. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 41 043 individuals met the inclusion criteria (no historical CVEs or tumours, no incidence of CVEs or tumours and no death during the four examinations) and had complete systolic blood pressure and BMI data. RESULTS: A total of 868 CVEs occurred. The cumulative incidence of CVEs increased as ARV(SBP) rose in both the normal weight and overweight groups. In same BMI groups, the risk of CVEs significantly increased as ARV(SBP) increased only in the normal weight group (highest quartiles of ARV(SBP): HR (95% CI) 2.20 (1.46–3.31)). In the different BMI groups, the risk of CVEs in the ARV(SBP) subgroup in each BMI group was higher than that the least quintile of ARV(SBP) in the normal weight group (highest quartiles of ARV(SBP) in obesity: HR (95% CI) 2.28 (1.47–3.55)). The result of the competitive risk model did not change. CONCLUSIONS: As BMI and ARV(SBP) increase, the risk of CVEs increases. However, the risk of visit-to-visit BPV on CVEs varies in different BMI groups, especially in people of normal weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CHiCTR-TNC1100 1489. |
---|