Cargando…

Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability

The ability to recognise places is known to deteriorate with advancing age. In this study, we investigated the contribution of age-related changes in spatial encoding strategies to declining place recognition ability. We recorded eye movements while younger and older adults completed a place recogni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilton, Christopher, Muffato, Veronica, Slattery, Timothy J., Miellet, Sebastien, Wiener, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02182
_version_ 1783585994957651968
author Hilton, Christopher
Muffato, Veronica
Slattery, Timothy J.
Miellet, Sebastien
Wiener, Jan
author_facet Hilton, Christopher
Muffato, Veronica
Slattery, Timothy J.
Miellet, Sebastien
Wiener, Jan
author_sort Hilton, Christopher
collection PubMed
description The ability to recognise places is known to deteriorate with advancing age. In this study, we investigated the contribution of age-related changes in spatial encoding strategies to declining place recognition ability. We recorded eye movements while younger and older adults completed a place recognition task first described by Muffato et al. (2019). Participants first learned places, which were defined by an array of four objects, and then decided whether the next place they were shown was the same or different to the one they learned. Places could be shown from the same spatial perspective as during learning or from a shifted perspective (30° or 60°). Places that were different to those during learning were changed either by substituting an object in the place with a novel object or by swapping the locations of two objects. We replicated the findings of Muffato et al. (2019) showing that sensitivity to detect changes in a place declined with advancing age and declined when the spatial perspective was shifted. Additionally, older adults were particularly impaired on trials in which object locations were swapped; however, they were not differentially affected by perspective changes compared to younger adults. During place encoding, older adults produced more fixations and saccades, shorter fixation durations, and spent less time looking at objects compared to younger adults. Further, we present an analysis of gaze chaining, designed to capture spatio-temporal aspects of gaze behaviour. The chaining measure was a significant predictor of place recognition performance. We found significant differences between age groups on the chaining measure and argue that these differences in gaze behaviour are indicative of differences in encoding strategy between age groups. In summary, we report a direct replication of Muffato et al. (2019) and provide evidence for age-related differences in spatial encoding strategies, which are related to place recognition performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7511632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75116322020-10-02 Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability Hilton, Christopher Muffato, Veronica Slattery, Timothy J. Miellet, Sebastien Wiener, Jan Front Psychol Psychology The ability to recognise places is known to deteriorate with advancing age. In this study, we investigated the contribution of age-related changes in spatial encoding strategies to declining place recognition ability. We recorded eye movements while younger and older adults completed a place recognition task first described by Muffato et al. (2019). Participants first learned places, which were defined by an array of four objects, and then decided whether the next place they were shown was the same or different to the one they learned. Places could be shown from the same spatial perspective as during learning or from a shifted perspective (30° or 60°). Places that were different to those during learning were changed either by substituting an object in the place with a novel object or by swapping the locations of two objects. We replicated the findings of Muffato et al. (2019) showing that sensitivity to detect changes in a place declined with advancing age and declined when the spatial perspective was shifted. Additionally, older adults were particularly impaired on trials in which object locations were swapped; however, they were not differentially affected by perspective changes compared to younger adults. During place encoding, older adults produced more fixations and saccades, shorter fixation durations, and spent less time looking at objects compared to younger adults. Further, we present an analysis of gaze chaining, designed to capture spatio-temporal aspects of gaze behaviour. The chaining measure was a significant predictor of place recognition performance. We found significant differences between age groups on the chaining measure and argue that these differences in gaze behaviour are indicative of differences in encoding strategy between age groups. In summary, we report a direct replication of Muffato et al. (2019) and provide evidence for age-related differences in spatial encoding strategies, which are related to place recognition performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7511632/ /pubmed/33013562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02182 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hilton, Muffato, Slattery, Miellet and Wiener. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hilton, Christopher
Muffato, Veronica
Slattery, Timothy J.
Miellet, Sebastien
Wiener, Jan
Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title_full Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title_fullStr Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title_short Differences in Encoding Strategy as a Potential Explanation for Age-Related Decline in Place Recognition Ability
title_sort differences in encoding strategy as a potential explanation for age-related decline in place recognition ability
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02182
work_keys_str_mv AT hiltonchristopher differencesinencodingstrategyasapotentialexplanationforagerelateddeclineinplacerecognitionability
AT muffatoveronica differencesinencodingstrategyasapotentialexplanationforagerelateddeclineinplacerecognitionability
AT slatterytimothyj differencesinencodingstrategyasapotentialexplanationforagerelateddeclineinplacerecognitionability
AT mielletsebastien differencesinencodingstrategyasapotentialexplanationforagerelateddeclineinplacerecognitionability
AT wienerjan differencesinencodingstrategyasapotentialexplanationforagerelateddeclineinplacerecognitionability