Cargando…

Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing

CRISPR/Cas has opened the prospect of direct gene correction therapy for some inherited retinal diseases. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of adeno-associated virus (AAV) mediated delivery to retinal cells in vivo; however, with the expanding repertoire of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases, it is n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Fan, Wing, Kristof, Wang, Jiang-Hui, Luu, Chi D., Bender, James A., Chen, Jinying, Wang, Qi, Lu, Qinyi, Nguyen Tran, Minh Thuan, Young, Kaylene M., Wong, Raymond C. B., Pébay, Alice, Cook, Anthony L., Hung, Sandy S. C., Liu, Guei-Sheung, Hewitt, Alex W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.570917
_version_ 1783586008232624128
author Li, Fan
Wing, Kristof
Wang, Jiang-Hui
Luu, Chi D.
Bender, James A.
Chen, Jinying
Wang, Qi
Lu, Qinyi
Nguyen Tran, Minh Thuan
Young, Kaylene M.
Wong, Raymond C. B.
Pébay, Alice
Cook, Anthony L.
Hung, Sandy S. C.
Liu, Guei-Sheung
Hewitt, Alex W.
author_facet Li, Fan
Wing, Kristof
Wang, Jiang-Hui
Luu, Chi D.
Bender, James A.
Chen, Jinying
Wang, Qi
Lu, Qinyi
Nguyen Tran, Minh Thuan
Young, Kaylene M.
Wong, Raymond C. B.
Pébay, Alice
Cook, Anthony L.
Hung, Sandy S. C.
Liu, Guei-Sheung
Hewitt, Alex W.
author_sort Li, Fan
collection PubMed
description CRISPR/Cas has opened the prospect of direct gene correction therapy for some inherited retinal diseases. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of adeno-associated virus (AAV) mediated delivery to retinal cells in vivo; however, with the expanding repertoire of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases, it is not clear which of these are most efficacious for retinal editing in vivo. We sought to compare CRISPR/Cas endonuclease activity using both single and dual AAV delivery strategies for gene editing in retinal cells. Plasmids of a dual vector system with SpCas9, SaCas9, Cas12a, CjCas9 and a sgRNA targeting YFP, as well as a single vector system with SaCas9/YFP sgRNA were generated and validated in YFP-expressing HEK293A cell by flow cytometry and the T7E1 assay. Paired CRISPR/Cas endonuclease and its best performing sgRNA was then packaged into an AAV2 capsid derivative, AAV7m8, and injected intravitreally into CMV-Cre:Rosa26-YFP mice. SpCas9 and Cas12a achieved better knockout efficiency than SaCas9 and CjCas9. Moreover, no significant difference in YFP gene editing was found between single and dual CRISPR/SaCas9 vector systems. With a marked reduction of YFP-positive retinal cells, AAV7m8 delivered SpCas9 was found to have the highest knockout efficacy among all investigated endonucleases. We demonstrate that the AAV7m8-mediated delivery of CRISPR/SpCas9 construct achieves the most efficient gene modification in neurosensory retinal cells in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7511709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75117092020-10-30 Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing Li, Fan Wing, Kristof Wang, Jiang-Hui Luu, Chi D. Bender, James A. Chen, Jinying Wang, Qi Lu, Qinyi Nguyen Tran, Minh Thuan Young, Kaylene M. Wong, Raymond C. B. Pébay, Alice Cook, Anthony L. Hung, Sandy S. C. Liu, Guei-Sheung Hewitt, Alex W. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience CRISPR/Cas has opened the prospect of direct gene correction therapy for some inherited retinal diseases. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of adeno-associated virus (AAV) mediated delivery to retinal cells in vivo; however, with the expanding repertoire of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases, it is not clear which of these are most efficacious for retinal editing in vivo. We sought to compare CRISPR/Cas endonuclease activity using both single and dual AAV delivery strategies for gene editing in retinal cells. Plasmids of a dual vector system with SpCas9, SaCas9, Cas12a, CjCas9 and a sgRNA targeting YFP, as well as a single vector system with SaCas9/YFP sgRNA were generated and validated in YFP-expressing HEK293A cell by flow cytometry and the T7E1 assay. Paired CRISPR/Cas endonuclease and its best performing sgRNA was then packaged into an AAV2 capsid derivative, AAV7m8, and injected intravitreally into CMV-Cre:Rosa26-YFP mice. SpCas9 and Cas12a achieved better knockout efficiency than SaCas9 and CjCas9. Moreover, no significant difference in YFP gene editing was found between single and dual CRISPR/SaCas9 vector systems. With a marked reduction of YFP-positive retinal cells, AAV7m8 delivered SpCas9 was found to have the highest knockout efficacy among all investigated endonucleases. We demonstrate that the AAV7m8-mediated delivery of CRISPR/SpCas9 construct achieves the most efficient gene modification in neurosensory retinal cells in vivo. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7511709/ /pubmed/33132845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.570917 Text en Copyright © 2020 Li, Wing, Wang, Luu, Bender, Chen, Wang, Lu, Nguyen Tran, Young, Wong, Pébay, Cook, Hung, Liu and Hewitt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Li, Fan
Wing, Kristof
Wang, Jiang-Hui
Luu, Chi D.
Bender, James A.
Chen, Jinying
Wang, Qi
Lu, Qinyi
Nguyen Tran, Minh Thuan
Young, Kaylene M.
Wong, Raymond C. B.
Pébay, Alice
Cook, Anthony L.
Hung, Sandy S. C.
Liu, Guei-Sheung
Hewitt, Alex W.
Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title_full Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title_fullStr Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title_short Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing
title_sort comparison of crispr/cas endonucleases for in vivo retinal gene editing
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.570917
work_keys_str_mv AT lifan comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT wingkristof comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT wangjianghui comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT luuchid comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT benderjamesa comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT chenjinying comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT wangqi comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT luqinyi comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT nguyentranminhthuan comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT youngkaylenem comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT wongraymondcb comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT pebayalice comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT cookanthonyl comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT hungsandysc comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT liugueisheung comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting
AT hewittalexw comparisonofcrisprcasendonucleasesforinvivoretinalgeneediting