Cargando…

Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur, Budhathoki, Pravash, Khadka, Sitaram, Shah, Prajwol Bikram, Pokharel, Nisheem, Rashmi, Prama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z
_version_ 1783586107027357696
author Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur
Budhathoki, Pravash
Khadka, Sitaram
Shah, Prajwol Bikram
Pokharel, Nisheem
Rashmi, Prama
author_facet Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur
Budhathoki, Pravash
Khadka, Sitaram
Shah, Prajwol Bikram
Pokharel, Nisheem
Rashmi, Prama
author_sort Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. METHODS: Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied. RESULTS: We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08–1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30–1.14) at the endpoint of study (7–15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84–1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42–1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13–3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment. CONCLUSION: There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7512218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75122182020-09-24 Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur Budhathoki, Pravash Khadka, Sitaram Shah, Prajwol Bikram Pokharel, Nisheem Rashmi, Prama Virol J Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19. METHODS: Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied. RESULTS: We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08–1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30–1.14) at the endpoint of study (7–15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84–1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42–1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13–3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment. CONCLUSION: There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles. BioMed Central 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7512218/ /pubmed/32972430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shrestha, Dhan Bahadur
Budhathoki, Pravash
Khadka, Sitaram
Shah, Prajwol Bikram
Pokharel, Nisheem
Rashmi, Prama
Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for covid-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthadhanbahadur favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT budhathokipravash favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khadkasitaram favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shahprajwolbikram favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pokharelnisheem favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rashmiprama favipiravirversusotherantiviralorstandardofcareforcovid19treatmentarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis