Cargando…

Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors

Problems in statistical auditing are usually one–sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given materiality fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement can be accepted or rejected....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martel-Escobar, María, Vázquez-Polo, Francisco-José, Hernández-Bastida, Agustín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20120919
_version_ 1783586174032412672
author Martel-Escobar, María
Vázquez-Polo, Francisco-José
Hernández-Bastida, Agustín
author_facet Martel-Escobar, María
Vázquez-Polo, Francisco-José
Hernández-Bastida, Agustín
author_sort Martel-Escobar, María
collection PubMed
description Problems in statistical auditing are usually one–sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given materiality fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement can be accepted or rejected. Dollar unit sampling (DUS) is a useful procedure to collect sample information, whereby items are chosen with a probability proportional to book amounts and in which the relevant error amount distribution is the distribution of the taints weighted by the book value. The likelihood induced by DUS refers to a 201–variate parameter [Formula: see text] but the prior information is in a subparameter [Formula: see text] linear function of [Formula: see text] , representing the total amount of error. This means that partial prior information must be processed. In this paper, two main proposals are made: (1) to modify the likelihood, to make it compatible with prior information and thus obtain a Bayesian analysis for hypotheses to be tested; (2) to use a maximum entropy prior to incorporate limited auditor information. To achieve these goals, we obtain a modified likelihood function inspired by the induced likelihood described by Zehna (1966) and then adapt the Bayes’ theorem to this likelihood in order to derive a posterior distribution for [Formula: see text]. This approach shows that the DUS methodology can be justified as a natural method of processing partial prior information in auditing and that a Bayesian analysis can be performed even when prior information is only available for a subparameter of the model. Finally, some numerical examples are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7512506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75125062020-11-09 Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors Martel-Escobar, María Vázquez-Polo, Francisco-José Hernández-Bastida, Agustín Entropy (Basel) Article Problems in statistical auditing are usually one–sided. In fact, the main interest for auditors is to determine the quantiles of the total amount of error, and then to compare these quantiles with a given materiality fixed by the auditor, so that the accounting statement can be accepted or rejected. Dollar unit sampling (DUS) is a useful procedure to collect sample information, whereby items are chosen with a probability proportional to book amounts and in which the relevant error amount distribution is the distribution of the taints weighted by the book value. The likelihood induced by DUS refers to a 201–variate parameter [Formula: see text] but the prior information is in a subparameter [Formula: see text] linear function of [Formula: see text] , representing the total amount of error. This means that partial prior information must be processed. In this paper, two main proposals are made: (1) to modify the likelihood, to make it compatible with prior information and thus obtain a Bayesian analysis for hypotheses to be tested; (2) to use a maximum entropy prior to incorporate limited auditor information. To achieve these goals, we obtain a modified likelihood function inspired by the induced likelihood described by Zehna (1966) and then adapt the Bayes’ theorem to this likelihood in order to derive a posterior distribution for [Formula: see text]. This approach shows that the DUS methodology can be justified as a natural method of processing partial prior information in auditing and that a Bayesian analysis can be performed even when prior information is only available for a subparameter of the model. Finally, some numerical examples are presented. MDPI 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7512506/ /pubmed/33266643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20120919 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martel-Escobar, María
Vázquez-Polo, Francisco-José
Hernández-Bastida, Agustín
Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_full Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_fullStr Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_short Bayesian Inference in Auditing with Partial Prior Information Using Maximum Entropy Priors
title_sort bayesian inference in auditing with partial prior information using maximum entropy priors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20120919
work_keys_str_mv AT martelescobarmaria bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors
AT vazquezpolofranciscojose bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors
AT hernandezbastidaagustin bayesianinferenceinauditingwithpartialpriorinformationusingmaximumentropypriors