Cargando…

Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model

The use of expert knowledge to quantify a Bayesian Network (BN) is necessary when data is not available. This however raises questions regarding how opinions from multiple experts can be used in a BN. Linear pooling is a popular method for combining probability assessments from multiple experts. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farr, Charisse, Ruggeri, Fabrizio, Mengersen, Kerrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20030209
_version_ 1783586224001253376
author Farr, Charisse
Ruggeri, Fabrizio
Mengersen, Kerrie
author_facet Farr, Charisse
Ruggeri, Fabrizio
Mengersen, Kerrie
author_sort Farr, Charisse
collection PubMed
description The use of expert knowledge to quantify a Bayesian Network (BN) is necessary when data is not available. This however raises questions regarding how opinions from multiple experts can be used in a BN. Linear pooling is a popular method for combining probability assessments from multiple experts. In particular, Prior Linear Pooling (PrLP), which pools opinions and then places them into the BN, is a common method. This paper considers this approach and an alternative pooling method, Posterior Linear Pooling (PoLP). The PoLP method constructs a BN for each expert, and then pools the resulting probabilities at the nodes of interest. The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are identified and compared and the methods are applied to an existing BN, the Wayfinding Bayesian Network Model, to investigate the behavior of different groups of people and how these different methods may be able to capture such differences. The paper focusses on six nodes Human Factors, Environmental Factors, Wayfinding, Communication, Visual Elements of Communication and Navigation Pathway, and three subgroups Gender (Female, Male), Travel Experience (Experienced, Inexperienced), and Travel Purpose (Business, Personal), and finds that different behaviors can indeed be captured by the different methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7512724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75127242020-11-09 Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model Farr, Charisse Ruggeri, Fabrizio Mengersen, Kerrie Entropy (Basel) Article The use of expert knowledge to quantify a Bayesian Network (BN) is necessary when data is not available. This however raises questions regarding how opinions from multiple experts can be used in a BN. Linear pooling is a popular method for combining probability assessments from multiple experts. In particular, Prior Linear Pooling (PrLP), which pools opinions and then places them into the BN, is a common method. This paper considers this approach and an alternative pooling method, Posterior Linear Pooling (PoLP). The PoLP method constructs a BN for each expert, and then pools the resulting probabilities at the nodes of interest. The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are identified and compared and the methods are applied to an existing BN, the Wayfinding Bayesian Network Model, to investigate the behavior of different groups of people and how these different methods may be able to capture such differences. The paper focusses on six nodes Human Factors, Environmental Factors, Wayfinding, Communication, Visual Elements of Communication and Navigation Pathway, and three subgroups Gender (Female, Male), Travel Experience (Experienced, Inexperienced), and Travel Purpose (Business, Personal), and finds that different behaviors can indeed be captured by the different methods. MDPI 2018-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7512724/ /pubmed/33265300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20030209 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farr, Charisse
Ruggeri, Fabrizio
Mengersen, Kerrie
Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title_full Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title_fullStr Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title_full_unstemmed Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title_short Prior and Posterior Linear Pooling for Combining Expert Opinions: Uses and Impact on Bayesian Networks—The Case of the Wayfinding Model
title_sort prior and posterior linear pooling for combining expert opinions: uses and impact on bayesian networks—the case of the wayfinding model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20030209
work_keys_str_mv AT farrcharisse priorandposteriorlinearpoolingforcombiningexpertopinionsusesandimpactonbayesiannetworksthecaseofthewayfindingmodel
AT ruggerifabrizio priorandposteriorlinearpoolingforcombiningexpertopinionsusesandimpactonbayesiannetworksthecaseofthewayfindingmodel
AT mengersenkerrie priorandposteriorlinearpoolingforcombiningexpertopinionsusesandimpactonbayesiannetworksthecaseofthewayfindingmodel