Cargando…

Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)

Two distinct puzzles, which are both known as Gibbs’ paradox, have interested physicists since they were first identified in the 1870s. They each have significance for the foundations of statistical mechanics and have led to lively discussions with a wide variety of suggested resolutions. Most propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Swendsen, Robert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060450
_version_ 1783586279772913664
author Swendsen, Robert H.
author_facet Swendsen, Robert H.
author_sort Swendsen, Robert H.
collection PubMed
description Two distinct puzzles, which are both known as Gibbs’ paradox, have interested physicists since they were first identified in the 1870s. They each have significance for the foundations of statistical mechanics and have led to lively discussions with a wide variety of suggested resolutions. Most proposed resolutions had involved quantum mechanics, although the original puzzles were entirely classical and were posed before quantum mechanics was invented. In this paper, I show that contrary to what has often been suggested, quantum mechanics is not essential for resolving the paradoxes. I present a resolution of the paradoxes that does not depend on quantum mechanics and includes the case of colloidal solutions, for which quantum mechanics is not relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7512968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75129682020-11-09 Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es) Swendsen, Robert H. Entropy (Basel) Article Two distinct puzzles, which are both known as Gibbs’ paradox, have interested physicists since they were first identified in the 1870s. They each have significance for the foundations of statistical mechanics and have led to lively discussions with a wide variety of suggested resolutions. Most proposed resolutions had involved quantum mechanics, although the original puzzles were entirely classical and were posed before quantum mechanics was invented. In this paper, I show that contrary to what has often been suggested, quantum mechanics is not essential for resolving the paradoxes. I present a resolution of the paradoxes that does not depend on quantum mechanics and includes the case of colloidal solutions, for which quantum mechanics is not relevant. MDPI 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7512968/ /pubmed/33265540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060450 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Swendsen, Robert H.
Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title_full Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title_fullStr Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title_full_unstemmed Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title_short Probability, Entropy, and Gibbs’ Paradox(es)
title_sort probability, entropy, and gibbs’ paradox(es)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7512968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20060450
work_keys_str_mv AT swendsenroberth probabilityentropyandgibbsparadoxes